Cancer, personality and stress: Prediction and prevention

https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(94)00001-8Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper reviews the history and present position of the theory that there exists a cancer-prone (Type C) personality which succumbs more readily to cancer, and dies more quickly after contracting cancer, than other types of personality. In particular, Type C is characterized by (a) a tendency to suppress emotions like anxiety and anger, and present a bland surface, and (b) to find it difficult to cope with stress, to develop feelings of hopelessness and helplessness, and finally depression. Modern work supports this theory quite strongly, both by controlled comparisons between cancer and other types of patients, and by prospective studies in which healthy cancer-prone subjects are followed up for up to 15 years and compared with subjects who are not cancer-prone, for mortality from and incidence of cancer. Intervention studies show that psychological therapy can (a) prevent cancer from arising, and (b) prolong life in terminal cancer patients. Theories have been developed to identify the way in which psychosocial factors can influence cancer production through affecting the workings of the immune system, and much experimental support has been found for these theories. There appears little doubt that psychosocial determinants constitute an important risk factor for cancer, and interact synergistically with other risk factors such as smoking, genetic influences, etc.

References (259)

  • J. Achterberg et al.

    Psychological factors and blood chemistries as disease outcome predictors for cancer patients

    Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research

    (1977)
  • R. Ader

    Psychoneuroimmunology

    (1981)
  • R. Ader et al.

    Behaviorally conditioned immuno-suppression

    Psychosomatic Medicine

    (1975)
  • C.M. Aldwin et al.

    Does emotionality predict stress?

    Findings from the normative age groups

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1989)
  • C. Allgulander et al.

    Excess mortality among 3,302 patients with pure anxiety neurosis

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • M. Amelang et al.

    Personality, stress and disease: Some results on the psychometric properties of the Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck inventories

    Psychological Reports

    (1992)
  • M. Angell

    Disease as a reflection of the psyche

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1985)
  • M.H. Antoni

    Neuroendocrine influences in psychoimmunology and neoplasia: A review

    Psychology and Health

    (1987)
  • D.W. Apse et al.

    Personality behavioural characteristics of lung cancer patients

    Journal of Psychosomatic Research

    (1974)
  • J.A. Asendorpf et al.

    The discrepant repressor: Differentiation between low anxiety, high anxiety, and repression of anxiety by autonomic-facial-verbal patterns of behavior

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • C. Bacon et al.

    A psychosomatic survey of cancer of the breast

    Psychosomatic Medicine

    (1952)
  • C.B. Bahnson

    Psychophysiological complementarity in malignancies: past work and future vistas

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (1969)
  • C.B. Bahnson

    In memory of Dr David Kissen: His work and his thinking

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (1969)
  • C.B. Bahnson

    Emotional and personality characteristics of cancer patients

  • C.B. Bahnson et al.

    Role of the ego defences: denial and repression in the etiology of malignant neoplasm

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (1966)
  • H. Baltrush et al.

    Cancer from the behavioural perspective: The Type C pattern

    Activitas Nervosa Superior

    (1988)
  • A. Bandura et al.

    Perceive self-efficacy in coping with cognitive stressors and opioid activation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1988)
  • J. Barrows

    A New Practical Essay in Cancer

    (1783)
  • H.K. Beecher

    The powerful placebo

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1955)
  • Beek, H. von (undated). Linguistic differences in the speech of cancer and CHD-prone patients. Rotterdam: Dept...
  • P. Bell et al.

    Repression-Sensitization

  • H. Benson et al.

    The placebo effect: A neglected asset in the care of patients

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1975)
  • H. Benson et al.

    Angina pectoris and the placebo effect

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1979)
  • H. Berndt et al.

    Persoenlichkeitsstruktur nach Eysenck bei Kranken mit Brustdruesen- und Bronchial Krebs und Diagnosen-verzoegerung durch die Patienten

    Archives fuer Geschwuestforschung

    (1980)
  • E. Bleiker et al.

    Rationality, emotional expression and control: Psychometric characteristics of a questionnaire for research in psycho-oncology

    Journal of Psychosomatic Research

    (1993)
  • N. Bolger et al.

    Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stress

    Journal of Personality

    (1992)
  • M. Boor et al.

    Digit symbol performance of subjects varying in anxiety and defensiveness

    Journal of Consulting Psychology

    (1967)
  • M. Borysenko et al.

    Stress, behavior, and immunity: Animal models and mediating mechanisms

    General Hospital Psychiatry

    (1982)
  • P.R.J. Burch

    Can epidemiology become a rigorous science?

    IRCS Medical Science

    (1986)
  • D. Byrne

    Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality

  • E.M. Canning et al.

    Depressive symptoms and adaptive style in children with cancer

    Journal of American Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • C. Catley et al.

    The relation of life stress to serum lipids in patients with coronary artery disease

    American Journal of Medicine

    (1962)
  • P.F. Cella et al.

    Methodological consideration in studying the stress-illness connection in women with breast cancer

  • C.L. Cooper et al.

    Incidence and perception of psychosocial stress: the relationship with breast cancer

    Psychological Medicine

    (1989)
  • C.L. Cooper et al.

    Coping strategies and breast disorders/cancer

    Psychological Medicine

    (1992)
  • C.L. Cooper et al.

    Psychosocial stress and breast cancer: The inter-relationship between stress events, coping strategies and personality

    Psychological Medicine

    (1993)
  • C.L. Cooper et al.

    Personality and Stress: Individual Differences in the Stress Process

    (1991)
  • C.N. Coryell

    Diagnosis-specific mortality: Primary unipolar depression and Briquet's syndrome

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1981)
  • A.H. Crisp

    Some psychosomatic aspects of neoplasia

    British Journal of Medical Psychology

    (1976)

    • Cited by (80)

    • Blaming in women with breast cancer subjected to intimate partner violence: A hermeneutic phenomenological study

      2023, Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing

    • Characteristics of oncology patients and their management strategy as a possible predictor of help in oncology social work

      2018, Kontakt
      Citation Excerpt :

      Particular attention was paid to a personality type that is thought to have an increased risk of developing cancer – the C type personality (Cancer Prone Personality). Based on many empirical studies such as those of Kune et al. [1], Eysenck [2], Fox [3] and Contrada et al. [4], the basic features of a carcinogenic personality have been defined: e.g. C type personalities suffer from the syndrome of helplessness, hopelessness, and tend to suppress negative emotions that are considered socially unacceptable (such as anxiety, anger, hostility). Suppressing and displacing emotions, as well as avoiding emotional conflicts, are the “backbone” of their personality and this can develop into a state of clinical depression.

    • The pain experience according to a phenomenological view on palliative care

      2015, Encephale

    • The Complex-System Approach to Personality: Main theoretical assumptions

      2015, Journal of Research in Personality
      Citation Excerpt :

      They propose the structures of temperament, which resemble the four temperaments according to the Hippocrates–Galen typology, and within these theories one can identify the harmonious Sanguine Type and harmonious Melancholic Type, and disharmonious Phlegmatic Type and disharmonious Choleric Type5 (cf. Fajkowska, 2013). Based on the appropriate empirical evidence associated with the arousal-related theories of temperament—that is, Pavlovian, Eysenckian, and Strelauvian (e.g., Eysenck, 1967, 1970, 1994; Fajkowska, Zagórska, Strelau, & Jaśkowski, 2012; Marszał-Wiśniewska & Fajkowska-Stanik, 2005; Pavlov, 1928; Strelau, 2008; Yermolayeva-Tomina, 1964; Zawadzki, 1992; Zawadzki & Strelau, 1997)—I assume that the harmonious melancholic and disharmonious choleric types are more reactive than regulative types of temperament, while the harmonious sanguine and disharmonious phlegmatic types seem to be more regulative than reactive types of temperament. Each of these three arousal-related theories of temperament indicates different areas of an organism’s activity engaged in maintaining the optimal level of arousal (stimulation).

    • Personality coherence as a personality dynamics-related concept

      2023, Journal of Personality

    • Rethinking Interpersonal stressors: Measurement development and implications for stress management in Chinese organizations

      2023, Current Psychology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text
    Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Inc.