Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 342, Issue 8866, 31 July 1993, Pages 257-264
The Lancet

Articles
Prevention of one-year vein-graft occlusion after aortocoronary- bypass surgery: a comparison of low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulants

https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)91815-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Summary

Aspirin, alone or in combination with dipyridamole, is known to prevent occlusion of aortocoronary vein grafts. The benefit of dipyridamole in addition to aspirin remains controversial, and the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants for prevention of vein-graft occlusion have not been established.

We assessed one-year angiographic vein-graft patency after aortocoronary-bypass surgery in 948 patients assigned to receive aspirin, aspirin plus dipyridamole, or oral anticoagulants in a prospective, randomised trial. The design was double-blind and placebo-controlled for the aspirin groups, but open for oral anticoagulant treatment. Dipyridamole (5 mg/kg per 24 h intravenously for 28 h, followed by 200 mg twice daily) and oral anticoagulants (desired prothrombin time range 2·8-4·8 international normalised ratio) were started before surgery, and aspirin (50 mg per day) was started after surgery. Clinical outcome was assessed by the incidence of myocardial infarction, thrombosis, major bleeding, or death. Occlusion rate of distal anastomoses was 11% in the aspirin plus dipyridamole group versus 15% in the aspirin group (relative risk 0·76, 95% Cl 0·54-1·05) and 13% in the oral anticoagulants group. Clinical events occurred in 20·3% of patients receiving aspirin plus dipyridamole compared with 13·9% of the aspirin group (relative risk 1·46, 95% Cl 1·02-2·08) and 16·9% of the oral anticoagulants group. Our data provide no convincing evidence that addition of dipyridamole to 50 mg aspirin per day improves aortocoronary vein-graft patency. Moreover, there is evidence that the combination increases the overall clinical-event rate. Compared with aspirin, oral anticoagulants provided no benefit.

References (28)

  • S. Goldman et al.

    Improvement in early saphenous vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery with antiplatelet therapy: results of a Veterans Administration cooperative study

    Circulation

    (1988)
  • S. Goldman et al.

    Saphenous vein graft patency 1 year after coronary artery bypass surgery and effects of antiplatelet therapy. Results of a Veterans Administration cooperative study

    Circulation

    (1989)
  • G. Sanz et al.

    Prevention of early aortocoronary bypass occlusion by low-dose aspirin and dipyridamole

    Circulation

    (1990)
  • Cited by (106)

    • Efforts to improve bypass graft patency have not been "in vein"

      2015, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
    • Continuing antiplatelet therapy before cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: A meta-analysis on the need for reexploration and major outcomes

      2014, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
      Citation Excerpt :

      The number needed to harm (NNTH) is 87 (95% CI 390, 44), calculated from an expected rate of reexploration of 2.4%.16 There was no statistical difference for death at 30 days4,5,15 and 1 year,15 myocardial infarction at 30 days,4,6,8,12,15 and stroke at 30 days (Table 2).6,15 There were no data available for renal insufficiency.

    • Fourteen-year follow-up from CABADAS: Vitamin K antagonists or dipyridamole not superior to aspirin

      2010, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although differences in the separate components of MACE are well recognized [11, 13–15], in our study, this finding is intriguing. Firstly, 1-year angiographic results from the CABADAS study showed comparable graft occlusion in the three treatment groups, which is not consistent with the observed difference already present within the second year of follow-up [8, 16]. Secondly, when evaluating the quality of VKA therapy (ie, percentage of time spent below the target range and the stability of the international normalized ratio) during the first year, no difference in repeat revascularization was observed for patients with optimal VKA and patients with nonoptimal VKA (data not shown).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text