Elsevier

Vision Research

Volume 32, Issue 8, August 1992, Pages 1513-1521
Vision Research

The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90207-YGet rights and content

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of binocular vision to the control of human prehension. Subjects reached out and grasped oblong blocks under conditions of either monocular or binocular vision. Kinematic analyses revealed that prehensile movements made under monocular viewing differed substantially from those performed under binocular conditions. In particular, grasping movements made under monocular viewing conditions showed longer movement times, lower peak velocities, proportionately longer deceleration phases, and smaller grip apertures than movements made under binocular viewing. In short, subjects appeared to be underestimating the distance of objects (and as a consequence, their size) under monocular viewing. It is argued that the differences in performance between the two viewing conditions were largely a reflection of differences in estimates of the target's size and distance obtained prior to movement onset. This study provides the first clear kinematic evidence that binocular vision (stereopsis and possibly vergence) makes a significant contribution to the accurate programming of prehensile movements in humans.

Reference (39)

  • UenoT.

    Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels

    Vision Research

    (1977)
  • BiersdorfW.R. et al.

    The effect of instructions and oculomotor adjustments on apparent size

    American Journal of Psychology

    (1963)
  • BishopP.O.

    Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: A new interpretation

  • BlakeR. et al.

    Further developments in binocular summation

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1981)
  • BridgemanB. et al.

    Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1979)
  • CrannellC.W. et al.

    Monocular and binocular estimations of distance when knowledge of the relevant space is absent

    Journal of Psychology

    (1970)
  • GummingB.G. et al.

    Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape

    Nature

    (1991)
  • FerrisS.H.

    Motion parallax and absolute distance

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1972)
  • FisherS.K. et al.

    Accommodation and apparent distance

    Perception

    (1988)
  • FiskJ.D. et al.

    The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: Hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1988)
  • FoleyJ.M.

    Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance

    Perception

    (1977)
  • FoleyJ.M.

    Binocular distance perception

    Psychological Review

    (1980)
  • FoleyJ.M. et al.

    Visually directed pointing as a function of target distance, direction, and available cues

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1972)
  • GogelW.C.

    Convergence as a cue to absolute distance

    Journal of Psychology

    (1961)
  • GogelW.C.

    Analysis of the perception of motion concomitant with a lateral motion of the head

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1982)
  • GoodaleM.A. et al.

    Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement

    Nature

    (1986)
  • GoodaleM.A. et al.

    A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them

    Nature

    (1991)
  • HaggardP. et al.

    Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking systems

    Journal of Motor Behavior

    (1990)
  • HainesR.F.

    Visual response time to colored stimuli in peripheral retina: Evidence for binocular summation

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics

    (1977)
  • Cited by (214)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text