Elsevier

Vision Research

Volume 30, Issue 11, 1990, Pages 1913-1921
Vision Research

Simultaneous orientation contrast for lines in the human fovea

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(90)90167-JGet rights and content

Abstract

When it is surrounded by lines of a differing orientation, a test line changes its apparent orientation in a direction away from that of the surround lines. Using a nulling technique to arrive at numerical values, the properties of this simultaneous orientation contrast have been analyzed: it diminishes with distance of the surround lines; rises and then falls off as a function of surround line orientation; decreases with exposure duration; is sharply tuned (± 100msec) for synchrony of test and surround line presentation; is robust to differences between test and surround line disparity but not intensity; and is reduced with dichoptic presentation of test and surround lines. Orientation contrast can be induced in a variety of oriented features, including illusory contours, an ellipse, a moving dot and a row of dots or lines, but two dots alone don't suffice. The results are taken as evidence that orientation is a domain sui generis, in which simultaneous contrast is exhibited in the same manner as in the domains of color, brightness and disparity.

Reference (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (76)

  • Angular tuning of tilt illusion depends on stimulus duration

    2020, Vision Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The direction and the magnitude of the tilt illusion depend on the relative angle (angular difference) between surrounding and test stimuli. For angular difference between 0 deg and 50 deg, the orientation of the central stimulus appears tilted away from the surrounding stimulus (e.g., Blakemore, Carpenter, & Georgeson, 1970; Westhehimer, 1990; repulsion or the direct effect). With larger angular differences, the central stimulus appears tilted towards the surrounding stimulus (e.g., Over, Broerse, & Crassini, 1972; Westhehimer, 1990; attraction or the indirect effect).

  • A unified account of tilt illusions, association fields, and contour detection based on elastica

    2016, Vision Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The two bar illusions in the model are in close accordance with known psychophysics. Westheimer (1990) reported repulsion from tilted flankers on the sides (Fig. 5B), or above and below (panel D). The orientation dependence of the repulsion from lateral flankers (panel B) closely matches (Kapadia et al., 2000) who also found repulsion maximal at around 30° (except for the small attractive effect they reported for larger flanker orientations), inset panel B. Kapadia et al. (2000) also placed flankers above and below the center, and tilted them (as in panel D).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text