Displacement detection in human vision

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(81)90114-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The displacement threshold is defined to be the smallest instantaneous target displacement that can be detected. Properties of the displacement threshold for a small, luminous spot were measured psychophysically. In a structureless field, the displacement threshold was near 1.5′, subject to individual variation. The effects of pattern were studied by measuring displacement thresholds at the centers of a set of annuli ranging from 2.85′–728′ dia. Displacement thresholds were reduced by the presence of the annuli and were as low as 0.3′. This threshold reduction could not be fully attributed to processes of relative spatial localization because displacement thresholds were lower than spatial localization (bull'seye) thresholds for annulus diameters greater than 20′. The displacement threshold is virtually independent of orientation and pupil size. It increased about 75% with a three log unit decrease in photopic target luminance. Displacement detection appears to depend upon the motion sense rather than the position sense. It may be limited by fixation accuracy.

Reference (46)

  • WestheimerG. et al.

    Integration regions for visual hyperacuity

    Vision Res.

    (1977)
  • WestheimerG. et al.

    Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity

    Vision Res.

    (1977)
  • AnstisS.M.

    Apparent Movement

  • AppelleS.

    Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the “oblique effect” in man and animals

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1972)
  • AubertH.

    Die bewegungsempfindung

    Pflugers Arch. ges. Physiol.

    (1886)
  • BakerK.E.

    Some variables influencing vernier acuity

    J. opt. Soc. Am.

    (1949)
  • BaslerA.

    U¨ber das sehen von bewegungen. I. Die wehrnehnung kleinster bewegungen

    Pflugers Arch. ges. Physiol.

    (1906)
  • BoringE.G.

    Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology

    (1942)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    Optical quality of the human eye

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1966)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1970)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    Stopped visual motion

    Nature

    (1979)
  • DunckerK.

    U¨ber induzierte bewegung

    Psychol. Forsch.

    (1929)
  • GordonD.A.

    The relation between the thresholds of form, motion and displacement in parafoveal and peripheral vision at a scotopic level of illumination

    Am. J. Psychol.

    (1947)
  • Cited by (87)

    • Differential processing: Towards a unified model of direction and speed perception

      2013, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Psychophysical research has also uncovered a considerable number of other differences in the way we perceive OR and NOR motion. Direction discrimination thresholds (Beardsley & Vaina, 2008; Linares, Motoyoshi, & Nishida, 2012; Snowden, 1992), displacement thresholds (Lappin, Donnelly, & Kojima, 2001; Legge & Campbell, 1981; Murakami, 2004; Palmer, 1986; Sokolov & Pavlova, 2006; Whitaker & MacVeigh, 1990) and reaction times (Smeets & Brenner, 1994) are lower for OR than for NOR motion, and changes in contrast (Grossman & Blake, 1999; Shioiri et al., 2002), spatial frequency (Shioiri et al., 2002) and stimulus size (Mestre, Masson, & Stone, 2001; Murakami & Shimojo, 1996; Nawrot & Sekuler, 1990) affect OR and NOR motion perception differently. Other differences occur during binocular rivalry – if one eye is presented with an OR motion stimulus and the other with NOR motion, the former becomes the dominant percept (e.g. Baker & Graf, 2008; Paffen et al., 2004).

    • Challenging the distribution shift: Statically-induced direction illusion implicates differential processing of object-relative and non-object-relative motion

      2012, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, empirical justification for postulating the differential processing model comes from numerous psychophysical studies showing that separate neural processes facilitate the extraction of object-relative and non-object-relative component velocities, and that our visual system is more responsive to object-relative than to non-object-relative motion. Velocity and displacement detection thresholds (Beardsley & Vaina, 2008; Lappin, Donnelly, & Kojima, 2001; Legge & Campbell, 1981; Leibowitz, 1955; Mack, Fisher, & Fendrich, 1975; Shioiri et al., 2002; Snowden, 1992; Sokolov & Pavlova, 2006) and reaction times (Smeets & Brenner, 1994), for example, are lower for object-relative than for non-object-relative motion perception. Changes in stimulus luminance contrast have been found to differentially affect detection of object-relative and non-object-relative velocities.

    • The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: Masking and facilitation

      2009, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      As mentioned in the Introduction, other potential influences of FPs include aiding accommodation and convergence, and reducing eye-movements. We know of little evidence to suggest that FPs are effective in these roles (Legge & Campbell, 1981; Owens & Leibowitz, 1975) but if they are, we expect that this would reduce variability (non-stationarity) of the psychometric function. In other words, we should expect these factors to make the psychometric function slightly steeper in the presence of FPs than in their absence.

    • User Self-Motion Modulates the Perceptibility of Jitter for World-locked Objects in Augmented Reality

      2023, Proceedings - 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2023
    • The coherent organization of dynamic visual images

      2023, Frontiers in Computer Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text