Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision
References (25)
- et al.
Lexical decision time as a function of visual field and stimulus probability
Cortex
(1983) - et al.
Visual field differences in verbal tasks. Effects of task familiarity and sex of subject
Brain Lang.
(1978) - et al.
Word matching and lexical decisions: a visual half-field study
Brain Lang.
(1983) - et al.
Choosing sides: on the variability of language lateralization in normal subjects
Neuropsychologia
(1984) - et al.
Viewing conditions and hemisphere asymmetry for the lexical decision
Neuropsychologia
(1986) - et al.
Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: influence of response selection and response bias
Brain Lang.
(1988) Sex difference and cognitive/motor interference with visual half-field stimulation
Neuropsycchologia
(1984)Lexical decisions in the right and left cerebral hemispheres
Brain Lang.
(1976)Mental duality in the intact brain
Bull. Clin. Neurosci.
(1986)Allocation of attention during visual word recognition
J. exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform.
(1976)
Human Cerebral Asymmetry
Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: a review of visual half-field research
Cited by (36)
Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance
2019, Consciousness and CognitionCitation Excerpt :Like E1a, E1c compares semantic and perceptual go/no-go tasks within subjects, without holding the stimuli the same between the two versions. Critically, and analogous to the manipulation by Measso and Zaidel (1990) and Redick et al. (2011), participants were instructed to make a go response based on the value that was the no-go stimulus set in E1a and E1b. For example, in the semantic task in E1a, participants made go responses to non-living exemplars and no-go responses to living exemplars; in E1c, go and no-go responses were mapped to living and non-living words, respectively.
Music reading expertise modulates hemispheric lateralization in English word processing but not in Chinese character processing
2018, CognitionCitation Excerpt :Indeed, recent research on visual word recognition has shown LH lateralization in reading words in alphabetic languages such as English. A classical RVF/LH advantage has been consistently reported in various tachistoscopic English word recognition tasks, such as word naming (e.g., Bradshaw & Gates, 1978; Brysbaert & d’Ydewalle, 1990) and lexical decision tasks (e.g., Barry, 1981; Measso & Zaidel, 1990). fMRI studies have shown a region inside the left fusiform area (Visual Word Form Area) responding selectively to words and pseudowords following the orthographic regularities in English (e.g., McCandliss, Cohen, & Dehaene, 2003).
Hemispheric asymmetries and cognitive flexibility: An ERP and sLORETA study
2012, Brain and CognitionLateralized neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes
2011, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :On a purely behavioural level, Measso and Zaidel (1990) showed that FCAs influence response inhibition performance. They observed a right visual field (RVF) advantage for response inhibition accuracy, reflecting a left-hemispheric dominance for the processing of verbal stimuli (Measso and Zaidel, 1990). However, the temporal and neuronal dynamics of brain areas underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes by FCAs are elusive so far, but are most essential in developing models how asymmetries modulate executive functions.
- ∗
Present address, Giovanni Measso, Via Castello 32/b, 33085 maniago, Italy