Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(90)90118-8Get rights and content

Abstract

A lateralized tachistoscopic lexical decision task with concrete nouns and orthographically regular nonwords was administered to normal subjects in three conditions using unimanual responses: Yes-No, Go-NoGo with nonword targets, and Go-NoGo with word targets. There was an overall right visual field advantage in accuracy and sensitivity, an interaction between visual hemifield and wordness in latency, and an overall “word” bias. No effect interacted with experimental conditions, showing that response programming did not affect hemispheric asymmetries. The data suggest independent lexical access and similar response programming in each hemisphere. These results are examined in light of three psycholinguistic models of lexical access and are interpreted to support instead a fourth one which posits separate and parallel computations for word decisions and for nonword decisions in each hemisphere.

References (25)

  • J.L. Bradshaw et al.

    Human Cerebral Asymmetry

    (1983)
  • C. Chiarello

    Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: a review of visual half-field research

  • Cited by (36)

    • Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance

      2019, Consciousness and Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Like E1a, E1c compares semantic and perceptual go/no-go tasks within subjects, without holding the stimuli the same between the two versions. Critically, and analogous to the manipulation by Measso and Zaidel (1990) and Redick et al. (2011), participants were instructed to make a go response based on the value that was the no-go stimulus set in E1a and E1b. For example, in the semantic task in E1a, participants made go responses to non-living exemplars and no-go responses to living exemplars; in E1c, go and no-go responses were mapped to living and non-living words, respectively.

    • Music reading expertise modulates hemispheric lateralization in English word processing but not in Chinese character processing

      2018, Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, recent research on visual word recognition has shown LH lateralization in reading words in alphabetic languages such as English. A classical RVF/LH advantage has been consistently reported in various tachistoscopic English word recognition tasks, such as word naming (e.g., Bradshaw & Gates, 1978; Brysbaert & d’Ydewalle, 1990) and lexical decision tasks (e.g., Barry, 1981; Measso & Zaidel, 1990). fMRI studies have shown a region inside the left fusiform area (Visual Word Form Area) responding selectively to words and pseudowords following the orthographic regularities in English (e.g., McCandliss, Cohen, & Dehaene, 2003).

    • Lateralized neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes

      2011, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      On a purely behavioural level, Measso and Zaidel (1990) showed that FCAs influence response inhibition performance. They observed a right visual field (RVF) advantage for response inhibition accuracy, reflecting a left-hemispheric dominance for the processing of verbal stimuli (Measso and Zaidel, 1990). However, the temporal and neuronal dynamics of brain areas underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes by FCAs are elusive so far, but are most essential in developing models how asymmetries modulate executive functions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present address, Giovanni Measso, Via Castello 32/b, 33085 maniago, Italy

    View full text