NoteThe contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming
References (20)
- et al.
Left hand advantage for right handers for spatial constant error: Preliminary evidence in a unimanual ballistic aimed movement
Neuropsychologia
(1983) - et al.
The role of the hemispheres in closed loop movements
Brain Cognit.
(1989) Influence of handedness on spatial compatibility effects with perpendicular arrangement of stimuli and responses
Acta Psychol.
(1987)The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Neuropsychologia
(1971)Manual asymmetries: feedback processing, output variability and spatial complexity: resolving some inconsistencies
J. Mot. Behav.
(1989)Manual asymmetries: in defense of a multifactorial account
J. Mot. Behav.
(1989)- Carson, R. G. and Goodman, D. Asymmetries in the discrete and pseudocontinuous regulation of visually guided reaching....
- et al.
Discrete versus continuous control of manual aiming
- et al.
The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space
Expl Brain Res.
(1985) - et al.
The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit
Expl Brain Res.
(1988)
Cited by (106)
Rhythmic and non-rhythmic auditory precues: Multiple mechanisms mediating movement performance
2021, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :Despite the evidence of improved performance, there is a lack of understanding of how the additional auditory information integrates with current models of motor control to benefit performance. Vision (Hansen, Glazebrook, Anson, Weeks, & Elliott, 2006; Tremblay, Hansen, Kennedy, & Cheng, 2013) and proprioception (Carson, Chua, Elliott, & Goodman, 1990; Chua & Elliott, 1993) are considered to be the key sources of sensory input used for movement control. More recently, RAS heard before and during movement execution have been reported to benefit endpoint error in the primary (anterior-posterior) and secondary (mediolateral) axes respectively (Peters & Glazebrook, 2020).
Rhythmic auditory stimuli heard before and during a reaching movement elicit performance improvements in both temporal and spatial movement parameters
2020, Acta PsychologicaCitation Excerpt :No-vision blocks had more endpoint variable and absolute error in both the anterior-posterior and mediolateral axes. This was expected as participants were unable to make error corrections based on visual feedback (Carson et al., 1990; Chua & Elliott, 1993; Elliott et al., 2010). Consistent with our predictions, reaction times were shorter and less variable in conditions where participants heard the sound before movement initiation.
Ipsilateral eye contributions to online visuomotor control of right upper-limb movements
2019, Human Movement ScienceInterlimb differences in coordination of unsupported reaching movements
2017, NeuroscienceHandedness in a virtual haptic environment: Assessments from kinematic behavior and modeling
2015, Acta PsychologicaCitation Excerpt :These results led Flowers and others to postulate that dexterity differences between the hands arise from initiating motor commands in response to afferent input, but not in the efferent output itself, thus sparing ballistic tasks. However, although some studies support these findings (e.g., Hoffmann, 1997), other attempts to differentiate hand dominance based on performance in open and closed loop tasks have yielded conflicting results (Carson, Chua, Elliott, & Goodman, 1990; Carson, Goodman, & Elliott, 1992; Roy & Elliott, 1986). Handedness is complex not only with respect to task specificity, but in terms of the neural mechanisms that produce it.