Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90043-1Get rights and content

Abstract

By using a simple reaction time (RT) paradigm we have investigated the spatial distribution of the benefits and costs of voluntarily directed attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. In the first experiment subjects deliberately allocated attention to each one of five stimulus positions disposed along the horizontal meridian, while at the same time fixing their eyes on the central position. The separation in visual angle between the central position and the two nearest positions, one on the left and the other on the right, was 10°; that between the central position and the two most eccentric positions was 30°. By comparing RT to brief flashes of light presented at each position during directed attention with RT to identical flashes at the same position during diffuse attention (i.e., in a condition in which subjects paid equal attention to all five positions), it was possible to determine that benefits, that is RT decreases relative to the diffuse-attention condition, were strictly limited to the attended position. Costs, i.e. RT increases relative to the diffuse-attention condition, showed a more diffuse and complex spatial pattern. When attention was directed to one of the noncentral positions, costs were apparent at the two contralateral positions and at the central position, but not at the ipsilateral position. When attention was directed to the central position, costs occurred at all other positions. This suggests a special role for the vertical meridian in delimiting the area of costs when one covertly orients towards the opposite right or left visual half field. Work of others and our preliminary evidence indicate that the area of costs is similarly limited by the horizontal meridian when one orients toward the opposite upper or lower visual field. In the second experiment we studied the inhibitory after-effect of covert orienting. Orienting to a light stimulus without moving the eyes to it may induce a short-lived facilitation of the speed of response to a second stimulus presented at the same position, but this facilitation is followed by a profound and prolonged RT retardation. By using a two-flashes paradigm we observed this RT retardation not only when the two stimuli appeared at the same position, but also when they occurred at different locations in the same altitudinal or lateral visual hemifield. There were no inhibitory after-effects when the two stimuli appeared on opposite sides of the vertical or horizontal meridian. Thus, as with the costs of voluntarily directed attention, the spatial spread of inhibitory after-effect of covert orienting was demarcated by the vertical or horizontal meridian. An attempt to provide a unitary interpretation for the similarity between the spatial distributions of the two different types of attentional effects is made by referring to directional constrains in motor readiness that are common to both situations.

References (27)

  • H.C. Hughes et al.

    Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention

    Neuropsychologia

    (1987)
  • D. Berlucchi et al.

    Direction of attention in the visual field as measured by a reaction time paradigm

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • G. Berlucchi et al.

    The organization of the callosal connections according to Sperry's principle of supplemental complementarity

  • Berlucchi, G., Tassinari, G., Marzi, C.A. and Di Stefano, M. Spatial distribution of the inhibitory after-effect of...
  • A. Cowey et al.

    Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1974)
  • C.J. Downing et al.

    The spatial structure of visual attention

  • J.D. Fisk et al.

    The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • R.F. Haines et al.

    Response time in the full visual field

    J. appl. Psychol.

    (1973)
  • H.C. Hughes et al.

    Spatial maps of directed visual attention

    J. exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1985)
  • J. Jonides

    Towards a model of the mind's eye's movements

    Can. J. Psychol.

    (1980)
  • J. Jonides

    Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement

  • J. Jonides et al.

    On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1984)
  • S.W. Keele

    Behavioral analysis of movement

  • Cited by (177)

    • Does temperament have a differential effect on Inhibition of Return (IOR)?

      2021, Acta Psychologica
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, when the time interval between the stimulus and the target exceeds approximately 300 ms, the reverse effect occurs, with slower and less accurate reactions to targets appearing at recently cued locations. This phenomenon was discovered independently by Posner and Cohen (1984) as well as by Tassinari, Aglioti, Chelazzi, Marzi, and Berlucchi (1987) and has been referred to variously as “inhibitory aftereffect” (Tassinari et al., 1987), “inhibitory tagging” (Fuentes, Vivas, & Humphreys, 1999; Klein, 1988) and, most frequently, “inhibition of return” (IOR; Posner, Rafal, Choate, & Vaughan, 1985). It is typically explained in terms of an inhibitory bias against returning attention to previously attended locations, directing it instead toward other locations and, thus, to serve as a novelty seeking mechanism (Posner & Cohen, 1984) or as a foraging facilitator (Klein & MacInnes, 1999; Itti & Koch, 2001).

    • Temporal dissociation between the focal and orientation components of spatial attention in central and peripheral vision

      2016, Acta Psychologica
      Citation Excerpt :

      In fact, as already shown in the literature, RTs increase with eccentricity for both uncued and precued targets during detection tasks (Marzi & Di Stefano, 1981; Marzi, Mancini, Metitieri, & Savazzi, 2006; Benso et al., 1998). This effect is usually attributed to changes in the distribution of covert spatial attention along the horizontal meridian of the visual field (e.g. Tassinari, Aglioti, Chelazzi, Marzi, & Berlucchi, 1987). Secondly, the interaction between SOAs, cue types and retinal eccentricity reveals the interplay between the focal and orientation components of spatial attention.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text