A comparison of two computer-administered versions of the NIMH diagnostic interview schedule

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(92)90019-KGet rights and content

Abstract

This study compared three versions of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS): “traditional” interviewer-administered DIS; computer-administered DIS (subject interacting alone with computer); computer-prompted DIS (interviewer using computer program as a guide). Kappas for 20 diagnoses ranged from .15 to .94, and averages for the three method pairs ranged from .57 to .64, which are comparable to other DIS reliability studies. Agreement between pairs of methods were comparable. Subjects' attitudes toward the computer interview were positive. While they felt they could better describe their feelings and ideas to a human, they found the computer contact less embarrassing. Overall, subjects had no preference for one method over another. Measures of social desirability and deviant response biases were correlated with diagnostic results. Reading ability did not affect subject's ability to respond to the DIS, although subjects with lower reading levels preferred the computer interview more.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (128)

  • Technology in practice

    2016, The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology
  • Treatment seeking and subsequent 1-year drinking outcomes among treatment clients in Sweden and the U.S.A. A cross-cultural comparison

    2012, Addictive Behaviors
    Citation Excerpt :

    Both studies used a checklist of symptoms to diagnose dependence. The Swedish study used the 10-item CIDI that operationally defines the ICD-10 criteria (World Health Organization, 1992) and the U.S. study used the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Psychoactive Substance Dependence (Erdman et al., 1992; Regier et al., 1984; Robins, Cuttler, & Keating, 1991) that operationally defines the seven DSM-IV criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). The ICD-10 and DSM-IV use comparable measures to assess dependence (Hasin, 2003).

  • Age effect on subcortical structures in healthy adults

    2012, Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text