The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Evidence from four studies demonstrates that social observers tend to perceive a “false consensus” with respect to the relative commonness of their own responses. A related bias was shown to exist in the observers' social inferences. Thus, raters estimated particular responses to be relatively common and relatively unrevealing concerning the actors' distinguishing personal dispositions when the responses in question were similar to the raters' own responses; responses differing from those of the rater, by contrast, were perceived to be relatively uncommon and revealing of the actor. These results were obtained both in questionnaire studies presenting subjects with hypothetical situations and choices and in authentic conflict situations. The implications of these findings for our understanding of social perception phenomena and for our analysis of the divergent perceptions of actors and observers are discussed. Finally, cognitive and perceptual mechanisms are proposed which might account for distortions in perceived consensus and for corresponding biases in social inference and attributional processes.

References (33)

  • D. Edlow et al.

    Ease of denial and defensive projection

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1966)
  • E.E. Jones et al.

    The attribution of attitudes

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1967)
  • D. Bramel

    A dissonance theory approach to defensive projection

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1962)
  • D. Bramel

    Selection of a target for defensive projection

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1963)
  • A. Calvin et al.

    An experimental investigation of the “pull” effect

    Journal of Social Psychology

    (1959)
  • N. Cameron et al.

    Behavior pathology

    (1951)
  • R.B. Cattell

    Projection and the design of projective tests of personality

    Character and Personality

    (1944)
  • J. Cooper et al.

    Attribution, dissonance, and the illusion of uniqueness

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1972)
  • S.P. Hayes

    The predictive ability of voters

    Journal of Social Psychology

    (1936)
  • F. Heider

    The psychology of interpersonal relations

    (1958)
  • D.S. Holmes

    Dimensions of projection

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1968)
  • E. Jones et al.

    From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception

  • E. Jones et al.

    The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior

  • D. Kahneman et al.

    On the psychology of prediction

    Psychological Review

    (1973)
  • D. Katz et al.

    Students' attitudes

    (1931)
  • Cited by (2132)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    David Greene is now at Carnegie-Mellon University.

    View full text