Exploring and reexploring issues of integrality, perceptual sensitivity, and dimensional salience

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(83)90040-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Some observations that can be described conveniently by investigators in terms of dimensional sensitivity and dimensional salience actually need not implicate the psychological reality of the dimensions for the subjects. The developmental hypothesis that stimuli are perceived often as integral in early childhood can account for such phenomena only with the assumption that young children often apprehend objects as global wholes, related to one another by overall similarity. Classification data, recently presented by J. R. Aschkenasy and R. D. Odom (Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1982, 34, 435–448) can be reinterpreted in this way. On this reinterpretation, Aschkenasy and Odom's findings are exactly what the developmental form of the integrality-separability hypothesis predicts. Moreover, a variety of other findings and lines of inference converge on the conclusion that, in young children, the use of overall similarity relations to organize perception and cognition predominates over the use of dimensional relations (and that the relative balance between these stimulus relations changes in development). Examples are selected from the literature on the natural development of word meanings, as well as from the literatures on children's and adults' classification.

References (36)

  • J.M. Anglin

    Word, object, and conceptual development

    (1977)
  • M. Bowerman

    The acquisition of word meaning: An investigation into some current conflicts

  • L. Brooks

    Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances

  • B.B. Burns et al.

    The relation between stimulus analyzability and perceived dimensional structure

  • E.V. Clark

    What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language

  • C.F. Foard et al.

    Holistic and analytic modes of processing: The multiple determinants of perceptual analysis

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (1984)
  • W.R. Garner

    The processing of information and structure

    (1974)
  • E.J. Gibson

    Principles of perceptual learning and development

    (1969)
  • Cited by (65)

    • Arbitrary but predictive cues support attention to overlooked features

      2021, Journal of Memory and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, we asked how children learn to allocate attention to features that have previously not mattered for word learning. Initially when children start learning words, they form categories holistically without focusing attention to any particular features of the object being labeled (Kemler, 1983; Samuelson & Smith, 1999; Son, Smith, & Goldstone, 2008). Through experience with language, children’s attention becomes tuned toward the regularities and features that matter for specific categories (e.g., shape for solid objects, shape and texture for animal categories, and material for non-solid substances) (Gasser & Smith, 1998; Jones, Smith, & Landau, 1991; Perry, Samuelson, & Burdinie, 2014; Yoshida & Smith, 2003a, Yoshida & Smith, 2003b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Preparation of this paper was supported by NSF Grant BNS 79-24035, and by a Lang Faculty Fellowship from Swarthmore College. It also was aided by Larry A. Nelson.

    View full text