Exploring and reexploring issues of integrality, perceptual sensitivity, and dimensional salience☆
References (36)
- et al.
Classification and perceptual development: Exploring issues about integrality and differential sensitivity
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1982) Infants are trichromats
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1976)- et al.
Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing
Cognitive Psychology
(1970) The ability for dimensional analysis in preschool and retarded children: Evidence from comparison, conservation, and prediction tasks
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1982)- et al.
Is there a developmental trend from integrality to separability in perception
Journal of Experimental Child psychology
(1978) - et al.
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
Cognitive Psychology
(1975) - et al.
Basic objects in natural categories
Cognitive Psychology
(1976) - et al.
Selective attention and the processing of integral and non-integral dimensions: A developmental study
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1976) - et al.
Developmental trends in free classification: Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1977) - et al.
Levels of experienced dimensionality in children and adults
Cognitive Psychology
(1978)
Word, object, and conceptual development
The acquisition of word meaning: An investigation into some current conflicts
Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances
The relation between stimulus analyzability and perceived dimensional structure
What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language
Holistic and analytic modes of processing: The multiple determinants of perceptual analysis
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
The processing of information and structure
Principles of perceptual learning and development
Cited by (65)
Arbitrary but predictive cues support attention to overlooked features
2021, Journal of Memory and LanguageCitation Excerpt :Specifically, we asked how children learn to allocate attention to features that have previously not mattered for word learning. Initially when children start learning words, they form categories holistically without focusing attention to any particular features of the object being labeled (Kemler, 1983; Samuelson & Smith, 1999; Son, Smith, & Goldstone, 2008). Through experience with language, children’s attention becomes tuned toward the regularities and features that matter for specific categories (e.g., shape for solid objects, shape and texture for animal categories, and material for non-solid substances) (Gasser & Smith, 1998; Jones, Smith, & Landau, 1991; Perry, Samuelson, & Burdinie, 2014; Yoshida & Smith, 2003a, Yoshida & Smith, 2003b).
The joint contributions of shape and color to variability discrimination
2003, Learning and MotivationThe Meaning of Brand Names to Children: A Developmental Investigation
2003, Journal of Consumer PsychologyFace Recognition in 4- To 7-Year-Olds: Processing of Configural, Featural, and Paraphernalia Information
2001, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyFace recognition performance in one-year-olds: A function of stimulus characteristics?
2000, Infant Behavior and DevelopmentRules and Resemblance: Their Changing Balance in the Category Learning of Humans (Homo sapiens) and Monkeys (Macaca mulatta)
2010, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
- ☆
Preparation of this paper was supported by NSF Grant BNS 79-24035, and by a Lang Faculty Fellowship from Swarthmore College. It also was aided by Larry A. Nelson.