The effects of age, positive affect induction, and instructions on children's delay of gratification

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(81)90101-6Get rights and content

Abstract

In two experiments children were subjected to a delay of gratification procedure in which higher levels of reward were contingent upon the maintenance of waiting behavior. In Experiment 1 positive affect induction facilitated delay behavior in 8-year-olds but not in 4-year-olds. However, delay behavior in the 4-year-old children was facilitated by a treatment combining positive affect induction with specific instructions to maintain positive thinking. This pattern of results was replicated in Experiment 2, but, in addition, waiting times were found to relate to the type of strategy reported by the children in the waiting test. Longer waiting times were associated with motoric activity and distractive cognition.

References (15)

  • J.C. Schwarz et al.

    Affect and delay of gratification

    Journal of Research in Personality

    (1977)
  • I.J. Toner et al.

    Evaluative verbalization and delay maintenance in children

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1979)
  • A. Bandura

    Social learning theory

    (1977)
  • C.I. Deiner et al.

    An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy and achievement cognitions following failure

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1978)
  • J.H. Flavell

    Cognitive development

    (1977)
  • P.S. Fry

    Affect and resistance to temptation

    Developmental Psychology

    (1975)
  • P.S. Fry

    Success, failure and resistance to temptation

    Developmental Psychology

    (1977)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Experiencing regret about a choice helps children learn to delay gratification

    2019, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
    Citation Excerpt :

    It has been suggested that developmental changes in delayed gratification are closely linked to emotional development (Hongwanishkul et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2013). However, although it is known that children’s concurrent emotional state can influence the likelihood that they delay gratification (Moore, Clyburn, & Underwood, 1976; Shimoni, Asbe, Eyal, & Berger, 2016; Yates, Lippett, & Yates, 1981), we do not know the means by which emotional development facilitates delayed gratification. Moreover, there is still uncertainty about how cognitive changes contribute to developmental improvements in delayed gratification (Mischel et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2016).

  • The effects of guilt on preschoolers’ cognitive flexibility and inhibition

    2017, Early Childhood Research Quarterly
    Citation Excerpt :

    For example, it is possible that the effects of guilt would be limited for older children irrespective of task difficulty. However, there is no support for this alternative interpretation, as it has been well established that negative emotions impair children’s inhibitory control (Masters & Santrock, 1976; Moore et al., 1976; Schwarz & Pollack, 1977; Yates, Lippett, & Yates, 1981). Also, there is consistent empirical evidence for the task difficulty account.

  • Do as I do, not as I say: Actions speak louder than words in preschoolers learning from others

    2016, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A few studies have also looked specifically at strategies that children themselves use to self-regulate, concluding that attention deployment is particularly effective (Sethi, Mischel, Aber, Shoda, & Rodriguez, 2000). Building on this work, other research suggests that strategy-focused direct instruction (thinking happy thoughts) influences children’s delay-of-gratification performance (Mischel, Ebbesen, & Zeiss, 1972; Yates, Lippett, & Yates, 1981). Despite the importance of strategy use and evidence that it can be transmitted, virtually no work has explored the teaching of these strategies and mechanisms by which children learn self-regulation from others (Fox & Calkins, 2003).

  • Kids These Days! Increasing delay of gratification ability over the past 50 years in children

    2020, Intelligence
    Citation Excerpt :

    Studies excluded for this reasons included: (Hrabic, 2015; Lomranz, Shmotkin, & Katznelson, 1983; Ritchie & Toner, 1984; Toner, 1981; Toner, Holstein, & Hetherington, 1977; Toner, Lewis, & Gribble, 1979; Toner, Moore, & Emmons, 1980; Toner & Smith, 1977). Studies that altered the marshmallow task substantially in an experimental or other context and no standard-instructions control group available were also excluded (e.g. Corfield, Al-Issa, & Johnson, 1976; Kanfer, Stifter, & Morris, 1981; Kidd, Palmeri, & Aslin, 2013; Kochanska, Murray, & Harlan, 2000; Leonard, Berkowitz, & Shusterman, 2014; Maccoby, Dowley, Hagen, & Degerman, 1965; Michaelson & Munakata, 2016; Mischel & Moore, 1980; Mischel & Underwood, 1974; Yates et al., 1981). One study was excluded for dropping all children who waited the full time (Joseph, 2015).

View all citing articles on Scopus

The project was able to be completed through the support of a research grant from Hartley CAE

View full text