Event-related potentials to repetition and change of auditory stimuli

https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90090-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The major intent of this study was to compare the role of stimulus repetitioon and change in the elicitation of the MMN, an ERP component specific to stimulus change, and N2b, usually partially overlapping the MMN when stimuli are attended. Event-related potentials were recorded in one set of conditions where subjects ignored the stimuli and read a book, and in another set of conditions where subjects counted stimuli designated as targets. Stimuli were delivered in 4 ways, the common feature between all these conditions being the occurrence of infrequent events at a probability of 0.20: (1) an oddball paradigm with 1 deviant, (2) an odddball paradigm with 2 deviants, each with a probability of 0.10, (3) a regular alternation of tones of 2 pitches where either of the 2 tones infrequently repeated (P=0.20), and (4) a random presentation of tones of 5 different pitches, where any of the 5 tones infrequently repeated (P=0.20). In the count conditions, the infrequent events were designated as targets. It was found that the MMN was elicited by stimulus change and not stimulus repetition in the ignore and count conditions, whereas the N2b was elicited by both stimulus changes and repetitions in the count conditions. It was also possible, in the count conditions, to disentangle the part of the late positive complex which is related to stimulus deviation and the part which is related to stimulus significance (target).

References (23)

  • D. Friedman et al.

    Analysis of nonsignal evoked cortical potentials in two kinds of vigilance tasks

  • Cited by (130)

    • Encoding of deterministic and stochastic auditory rules in the human brain: The mismatch negativity mechanism does not reflect basic probability

      2021, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The participants might have also accomplished the task by learning the two highly probable sounds X and Z, matching the incoming sound with these templates, and not to respond when there is a match, but to do so when there is no match. Again, this kind of behavioral relevance is known to trigger the N2b complex (e.g., Ritter et al., 1992; Sams et al., 1983). A third scenario is that participants behaved like a gambler and predicted (at a more cognitive/conceptual level than the one tapped by the MMN) that either sound X or sound Z will occur next; if this prediction is wrong, N2b is elicited.

    • When temporal prediction errs: ERP responses to delayed action-feedback onset

      2019, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      This N2 enhancement has been associated with voluntary deviance detection (Knolle et al., 2013b). Specifically, the N2 has been related to the conscious detection of an infrequent variation of stimulus properties (Horváth et al., 2008; Ritter et al., 1992) and may lead to more efficient processing given that more processing resources are activated (Knolle et al., 2013b). In a previous study using a button-press paradigm, the N2 was more enhanced for self-generated than externally generated tones, which was interpreted as evidence that unexpected sensory feedback is salient, leads to conscious error awareness, and calls for enhanced resources allocation (Knolle et al., 2013b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service Grant NS30029, the Academy of Finland, and the Väinö Tanner Foundation (Helsinki, Finland).

    View full text