Event-related potentials to repetition and change of auditory stimuli☆
References (23)
- et al.
The N2 component elicited by stimulus matches and multiple targets
Biol. Psychol.
(1988) - et al.
Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1990) - et al.
Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1985) - et al.
Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted
Acta Psychol. (Amst.)
(1978) - et al.
Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials
Biol. Psychol.
(1982) - et al.
Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in au auditory discrimination task
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1990) - et al.
Right-hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1991) - et al.
Sequential effects in the ERP in discriminating two stimuli
Biol. Psychol.
(1983) - et al.
Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable stimuli in man
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1975) - et al.
Separability of different negative components of the event-related potential associated with auditory processing
Psychophysiology
(1986)
Analysis of nonsignal evoked cortical potentials in two kinds of vigilance tasks
Cited by (130)
Cantonese advantage on English stress perception: Constraints and neural underpinnings
2021, NeuropsychologiaEncoding of deterministic and stochastic auditory rules in the human brain: The mismatch negativity mechanism does not reflect basic probability
2021, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :The participants might have also accomplished the task by learning the two highly probable sounds X and Z, matching the incoming sound with these templates, and not to respond when there is a match, but to do so when there is no match. Again, this kind of behavioral relevance is known to trigger the N2b complex (e.g., Ritter et al., 1992; Sams et al., 1983). A third scenario is that participants behaved like a gambler and predicted (at a more cognitive/conceptual level than the one tapped by the MMN) that either sound X or sound Z will occur next; if this prediction is wrong, N2b is elicited.
Auditory processing deficit in individuals with dyslexia: A meta-analysis of mismatch negativity
2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsWhen temporal prediction errs: ERP responses to delayed action-feedback onset
2019, NeuropsychologiaCitation Excerpt :This N2 enhancement has been associated with voluntary deviance detection (Knolle et al., 2013b). Specifically, the N2 has been related to the conscious detection of an infrequent variation of stimulus properties (Horváth et al., 2008; Ritter et al., 1992) and may lead to more efficient processing given that more processing resources are activated (Knolle et al., 2013b). In a previous study using a button-press paradigm, the N2 was more enhanced for self-generated than externally generated tones, which was interpreted as evidence that unexpected sensory feedback is salient, leads to conscious error awareness, and calls for enhanced resources allocation (Knolle et al., 2013b).
Differential deviant probability effects on two hierarchical levels of the auditory novelty system
2016, Biological Psychology
- ☆
This work was supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service Grant NS30029, the Academy of Finland, and the Väinö Tanner Foundation (Helsinki, Finland).