Elsevier

Cognitive Psychology

Volume 24, Issue 1, January 1992, Pages 1-55
Cognitive Psychology

Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-JGet rights and content

Abstract

Much literature attests to the existence of order effects in the updating of beliefs. However, under what conditions do primacy, recency, or no order effects occur? This paper presents a theory of belief updating that explicitly accounts for order-effect phenomena as arising from the interaction of information-processing strategies and task characteristics. Key task variables identified are complexity of the stimuli, length of the series of evidence items, and response mode (Step-by-Step or End-of-Sequence). A general anchoring-and-adjustment model of belief updating is proposed. This has two forms depending on whether information is processed in a Step-by-Step or End-of-Sequence manner. In addition, the model specifies that evidence can be encoded in two ways, either as a deviation relative to the size of the preceding anchor or as positive or negative vis-à-vis the hypothesis under consideration. Whereas the former (labeled estimation mode) results in data consistent with averaging models of judgment, the latter (labeled evaluation mode) implies adding models. Conditions are specified under which (a) evidence is encoded in estimation or evaluation modes and (b) use is made of the Step-by-Step or End-of-Sequence processing strategies. The theory is shown both to account for much existing data and to make novel predictions for combinations of task characteristics where current data are sparse. Some of these predictions are examined and validated in a series of five experiments. Finally, both the theory and the experimental results are discussed with respect to the structure of models of updating processes, limitations and extensions of the present work, and the importance of developing a procedural theory of judgment.

References (126)

  • N.H. Anderson

    Test of a model for opinion change

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1959)
  • N.H. Anderson

    Test of a model for number-averaging behavior

    Psychonomic Science

    (1964)
  • N.H. Anderson

    Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1965)
  • N.H. Anderson

    Application of a weighted average model to a psychophysical averaging task

    Psychonomic Science

    (1967)
  • N.H. Anderson

    Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1968)
  • N.H. Anderson

    Information integration theory applied to attitudes about U.S. presidents

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (1973)
  • N.H. Anderson

    Serial position curves in impression formation

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1973)
  • N.H. Anderson
  • N.H. Anderson et al.

    Primacy effects in personality impression formation

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1961)
  • N.H. Anderson et al.

    New light on order effects in attitude change

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1973)
  • N.H. Anderson et al.
  • N.H. Anderson et al.

    Further data on a weighted average model for judgment in a lifted weight task

    Perception & Psychophysics

    (1968)
  • N.H. Anderson et al.

    Order effects in impression formation in four classes of stimuli

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1964)
  • S. Asare

    The auditor's going concern decision: Interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence

    (1989)
  • S.E. Asch

    Forming impressions of personality

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1946)
  • S.E. Asch et al.

    Thinking about persons

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1984)
  • A.H. Ashton et al.

    Sequential belief revision in auditing

    The Accounting Review

    (1988)
  • M. Benassi

    Effects of order presentation, primacy, and physical attractiveness on attributions of ability

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1982)
  • P. Bossart et al.

    Effects of context, frequency, and order of presentation of evaluative assertions on impression formation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1966)
  • E. Brunswik
  • C.F. Camerer

    Do biases in probability judgments matter in markets? Experimental evidence

    American Economic Review

    (1987)
  • D.K. Chalmers

    Repetition and order effects in attitude formation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1971)
  • J. Cooper et al.

    Attitudes and attitude change

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (1984)
  • W.D. Crano

    Primacy versus recency in retention of information and opinion change

    Journal of Social Psychology

    (1977)
  • H. Cromwell

    The relative effect on audience attitude of the first versus the second argumentative speech of a series

    Speech Monographs

    (1950)
  • L.J. Cronbach

    Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology

    American Psychologist

    (1975)
  • S.P. Curley et al.

    Primacy effects in clinical judgments of contingency

    Medical Decision Making

    (1988)
  • H.C.A. Dale

    Weighing evidence: An attempt to assess the efficiency of the human operator

    Ergonomics

    (1968)
  • J.H. Davis

    Order in the courtroom

  • H. De Wit et al.

    Effects of diazepam on a belief-updating task

    Psychological Reports

    (1989)
  • Dillard, J. F., Kauffman, N. L., & Spires, E. E. (in press). Evidence order and belief revision in management...
  • E.K. Dreben et al.

    The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1979)
  • W. Edwards

    Conservatism in human information processing

  • H.J. Einhorn et al.

    Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (1981)
  • H.J. Einhorn et al.

    Judging probable cause

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1986)
  • R.S. Feldman et al.

    Degree and sequence of success as determinants of self-attribution of ability

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (1977)
  • R.S. Feldman et al.

    Primacy effects in self-attribution of ability

    Journal of Personality

    (1978)
  • M. Fishbein et al.
  • B. Fischhoff et al.

    Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective

    Psychological Review

    (1983)
  • A. Furnham

    The robustness of the recency effect: Studies using legal evidence

    The Journal of General Psychology

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    This work was supported by a contract with the Office of Naval Research as well as research funds from The University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business.

    ☆☆

    The present paper also owes much to penetrating critiques of earlier versions by Norman H. Anderson and Joshua Klayman.

    View full text