Elsevier

Cognitive Psychology

Volume 22, Issue 3, July 1990, Pages 374-419
Cognitive Psychology

In search of insight

https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90008-RGet rights and content

Abstract

This paper describes the process of attaining the insight required to solve a particular problem—the Mutilated Checkerboard (MC) problem. It shows that attaining insight requires discovering an effective problem representation, and that performance on insight problems can be predicted from the availability of generators and constraints in the search for such a representation. To test these claims we varied the salience of features leading to the critical concept of parity in the MC problem. Using chronometric measures, verbal protocols, and computer simulations, we explored first why it is difficult to find a representation for the Checkerboard problem, and then tested four potential sources of search constraint for reducing the difficulty: cue salience manipulations, prior knowledge, hints, and heuristics. While subjects used each of these four sources of constraint, a particular heuristic—noticing properties of the situation that remained invariant during solution attempts (the Notice Invariants heuristic)—proved to be a particularly powerful means for focusing search. In conjunction with hints and independently, it played a major part in producing the insight that yielded an effective problem representation and solution.

References (44)

  • R.L. Dominowski

    Comment on “An examination of the alleged role of ‘fixation’ in the solution of ‘insight’ problems”

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (1981)
  • K. Duncker

    On problem solving

    Psychological Monographs

    (1945)
  • H.E. Durkin

    Trial and error, gradual analysis, and sudden reorganization: An experimental study of problem solving

    Archives of Psychology, no. 210

    (1937)
  • P. Ellen

    Direction, past experience, and hints in creative problem solving: Reply to Weisberg and Alba

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (1982)
  • K.A. Ericsson et al.
  • B. Ghiselin
  • J. Hadamard
  • J.W. Haefele
  • J.R. Hayes et al.

    Understanding written problem instructions

  • C.A. Kaplan

    SWITCH: Towards a simulation of representational change in the Mutilated Checkerboard Problem

  • G. Katona
  • W. Kohler
  • Cited by (416)

    • The irreconcilability of insight

      2024, Animal Cognition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This reseach was supported in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under Contract F-33615-84-K-1520, and in part by the Personnel and Training Programs, Psychological Sciences Division, Office of Naval Research, under Contract No. N00014-86-K-0768. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

    View full text