Orientation in cognitive maps☆
References (35)
- et al.
Unilateral neglect of representation space
Cortex
(1978) Modeling spatial knowledge
Cognitive Science
(1978)- et al.
Distortions in judged spatial relations
Cognitive Psychology
(1978) Styles and methods of structuring a city
Environment and Behavior
(1970)Representation of physical space
- et al.
The visual world behind the head
American Journal of Psychology
(1977) Reverse illusions of orientation
Psychological Review
(1894)Spatial integrations in a human maze
University of California Publications in Psychology
(1932)Memory for urban geography
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
(1979)- et al.
Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals
Perception and Psychophysics
(1978)
Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images
The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus
Memory and Cognition
Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame
Perception and Psychophysics
Environmental cognition
Psychological Bulletin
The content and manipulation of cognitive maps in children and adults
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
The development of spatial cognition: A review
Cited by (147)
A computational cognitive model of judgments of relative direction
2021, CognitionCitation Excerpt :Other findings (e.g., Shelton & McNamara, 2001, Experiment 3) demonstrate clear nonlinear functions of pointing error, suggesting that processes other than mental rotation are used, or that gradient angular steps in mental rotation do not always affect spatial representations linearly. For example, Hintzman et al. (1981) found nonlinear patterns in directional knowledge across imagined headings when participants relied on cognitive maps as opposed to visual maps but concluded that mental rotation does not necessitate linearity. Fifth, mechanisms for updating the memory representation of spatial relations across trials should be tested in future models.
Shared contributions of the head and torso to spatial reference frames across spatial judgments
2020, CognitionCitation Excerpt :Previous work has indicated that perspective-taking judgments on the Left/Right dimension are qualitatively different from judgments on the In front of/Behind dimension. Hintzman, O'Dell, and Arndt (1981) found that pointing to targets in front of or behind a position in an imagined environment was significantly faster than for other horizontal directions. Similarly, Franklin and Tversky (1990) found that identification of objects by their locations on the Left/Right dimension was significantly faster than In front of/Behind.
Disentangling spatial conflicts in mental perspective taking
2020, Acta PsychologicaSpatial Memory and Navigation
2017, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive ReferenceAn Efficient Single-session Spatial Skill Trainer for Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Trial
2020, Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyCitation Excerpt :These tests were used to establish the spatial skill baseline and assess differences in spatial skills before the intervention. These standardized tests have been studied for validity in general population [19–23] and are often used to explore the individual spatial abilities of the participant. Mental rotation and perspective taking are skills that were examined within the diverse surgeons population [6,7].
A new psychometric task measuring spatial perspective taking in ambulatory virtual reality
2022, Frontiers in Virtual Reality
- ☆
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant BNS 76-01830.