Elsevier

Cognitive Psychology

Volume 13, Issue 2, April 1981, Pages 149-206
Cognitive Psychology

Orientation in cognitive maps

https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90007-4Get rights and content

Abstract

In 14 experiments, subjects had to “point to” surrounding environmental locations (targets) while imagining themselves in a particular spot facing in various directions (orientations). The spatial information was either committed to memory (cognitive maps) or directly presented on each trial in the visual or tactile modality. Reaction times (RT) indicated that orientation shifts were achieved through mental rotation in the visual task, but not in the cognitive map or tactile tasks. Further, in the latter two tasks targets were located most quickly when they were adjacent to or opposite the imagined orientation. Several explanations of this finding were tested. Various aspects of the data suggest that cognitive maps are not strictly holistic, but consist of orientation-specific representations, and—at least in part—of relational propositions specific to object pairs.

References (35)

  • E. Bisiach et al.

    Unilateral neglect of representation space

    Cortex

    (1978)
  • B. Kuipers

    Modeling spatial knowledge

    Cognitive Science

    (1978)
  • A. Stevens et al.

    Distortions in judged spatial relations

    Cognitive Psychology

    (1978)
  • D. Appleyard

    Styles and methods of structuring a city

    Environment and Behavior

    (1970)
  • F. Attneave

    Representation of physical space

  • F. Attneave et al.

    The visual world behind the head

    American Journal of Psychology

    (1977)
  • M.A. Binet

    Reverse illusions of orientation

    Psychological Review

    (1894)
  • W. Brown

    Spatial integrations in a human maze

    University of California Publications in Psychology

    (1932)
  • R.W. Byrne

    Memory for urban geography

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1979)
  • P.A. Carpenter et al.

    Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1978)
  • L.A. Cooper et al.

    Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images

  • L.A. Cooper et al.

    The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus

    Memory and Cognition

    (1973)
  • M.C. Corballis et al.

    Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame

    Perception and Psychophysics

    (1978)
  • G.W. Evans

    Environmental cognition

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1980)
  • D.A. Hardwick et al.

    The content and manipulation of cognitive maps in children and adults

    Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

    (1976)
  • R.A. Hart et al.

    The development of spatial cognition: A review

  • I.P. Howard et al.
  • Cited by (147)

    • A computational cognitive model of judgments of relative direction

      2021, Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other findings (e.g., Shelton & McNamara, 2001, Experiment 3) demonstrate clear nonlinear functions of pointing error, suggesting that processes other than mental rotation are used, or that gradient angular steps in mental rotation do not always affect spatial representations linearly. For example, Hintzman et al. (1981) found nonlinear patterns in directional knowledge across imagined headings when participants relied on cognitive maps as opposed to visual maps but concluded that mental rotation does not necessitate linearity. Fifth, mechanisms for updating the memory representation of spatial relations across trials should be tested in future models.

    • Shared contributions of the head and torso to spatial reference frames across spatial judgments

      2020, Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous work has indicated that perspective-taking judgments on the Left/Right dimension are qualitatively different from judgments on the In front of/Behind dimension. Hintzman, O'Dell, and Arndt (1981) found that pointing to targets in front of or behind a position in an imagined environment was significantly faster than for other horizontal directions. Similarly, Franklin and Tversky (1990) found that identification of objects by their locations on the Left/Right dimension was significantly faster than In front of/Behind.

    • Spatial Memory and Navigation

      2017, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference
    • An Efficient Single-session Spatial Skill Trainer for Robot-assisted Surgery: A Randomized Trial

      2020, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These tests were used to establish the spatial skill baseline and assess differences in spatial skills before the intervention. These standardized tests have been studied for validity in general population [19–23] and are often used to explore the individual spatial abilities of the participant. Mental rotation and perspective taking are skills that were examined within the diverse surgeons population [6,7].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant BNS 76-01830.

    View full text