Personally relevant intrusions outside the laboratory: Long-term suppression increases intrusion

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)90163-5Get rights and content

Abstract

It has been suggested that the suppression of unwanted thoughts may increase their frequency and that this effect may contribute to some psychological problems. Previous studies have examined this over a period of minutes, in an artificial setting. Suppression over a four day period was evaluated in the present study. Each S was asked to identify a negative intrusive thought which he or she experienced and to record each occurrence of it in conditions designed to maximise the similarity to those experienced by obsessional patients. Ss were randomly allocated to one of three groups. One group was asked to suppress their thoughts whenever they occurred, another group was asked to think about their thoughts whenever they occurred and the third group just recorded the thoughts whenever they occurred. This design allowed experimental control of both attention to and manipulation of the target thoughts in contrast to attention and active suppression. It was found that Ss who suppressed their thoughts experienced more thoughts and found them more uncomfortable than Ss in the other two groups. This is consistent with the theory that suppression increases thought frequency and may be important in the development and maintenance of some disorders.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (141)

  • The appropriateness of using a counter app in experimental studies assessing unwanted intrusive thoughts

    2020, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    In a similar vein, Purdon and Clark (2000) argued that monitoring the occurrence of a particular thought increases its salience in consciousness, and marked salience in turn might result in an increase in the reported frequency of that thought. The process of thought monitoring during event marking might mimic elevated awareness of the (re-)occurrence of obsessive thoughts in individuals diagnosed with OCD (Abramowitz, Tolin, & Street, 2001; Trinder & Salkovskis, 1994), a phenomenon that has been described as heightened cognitive self-consciousness by other authors (de Bruin, Muris, & Rassin, 2007; Janeck, Calamari, Riemann, & Heffelfinger, 2003; Purdon, Gifford, McCabe, & Antony, 2011). The potential increase in reported UIT frequency through event marking has never been tested directly, nor the possible extent to which UIT frequency might be overreported.

  • Manipulating beliefs about losing control causes checking behaviour

    2017, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text