Behavioral assessment
Effects of varying scoring rules of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) for the diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder in motor vehicle accident victims

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00064-QGet rights and content

Abstract

We examined the effects of varying the scoring rules for the CAPS (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale) on the diagnosis of PTSD in a sample of 100 victims of recent motor vehicle accidents. This was done by assessing, for each scoring rule, the rate of categorical diagnosis and the effect on group mean scores on measures of subjective distress and role impairment. Changing from the most liberal to the most conservative scoring rule results in a change in diagnosis of PTSD from 44% to 29% of the sample. Comparisons of those included as PTSD under the most conservative scoring criteria vs those excluded (who had previously been included) reveal significantly greater subjective distress and role impairment among those who continue to be included in the PTSD category. Thus, changes in scoring rules have clinically significant effects on the incidence and severity of diagnosed PTSD. This indicates that the selection of scoring rules has important implications for epidemiological estimates of the prevalence of PTSD, and that PTSD studies using different scoring rules as inclusion criteria may be using somewhat different samples.

References (12)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (1987)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • D. Blake et al.

    Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)

    (1990)
  • E.J. Hickling et al.

    Post-traumatic stress disorder and motor vehicle accidents

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1992)
  • B.K. Jordan et al.

    Lifetime and current prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders among Vietnam veterans and controls

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • M.B. Keller et al.

    A longitudinal interval follow-up evaluation: A comprehensive method for assessing outcome and prospective longitudinal studies

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (86)

  • Trauma cue-elicited emotional response profiles influence acute experiences of alcohol urge

    2022, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
    Citation Excerpt :

    The interview procedures were identical for individuals with and without Criterion A trauma. Symptoms were scored using the conservative “rule of 2” for both intensity and frequency ratings (i.e., at least “moderate” severity; Blanchard et al., 1995). These procedures resulted in three sub-groups within our sample: individuals with no Criterion A trauma (“No Trauma”; n = 127), individuals with at least one Criterion A trauma, but did not report symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD (“Trauma Only”; n = 106) and individuals with Criterion A trauma and clinically significant PTSD (“PTSD” n = 71).

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder after minor trauma – A prospective cohort study

    2020, Medical Hypotheses
    Citation Excerpt :

    The symptoms have to last longer than one month, cause significant functional impairment and develop within the first 6 months after trauma [2]. Many studies investigated possible influencing factors for developing a PTSD [3–7]. The results showed that injury severity is not a good predictor of psychosocial outcome, whereas the subjective impact of trauma is much more important in this context [7].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text