Obsessions, responsibility and guilt

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(93)90066-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction of the concept of “inflated responsibility” into the so-called anatomy of obsessions gives rise to an elaborated analysis of obsessions, responsibility and guilt. The analysis touches on a range of phenomena including anger and guilt, control of thoughts, the fusion of thoughts and action, resistance to additional responsibility, procrastination and unfinished tasks, hypochondriasis, brief holidays.

Some clinical implications are deduced from the analysis.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (464)

  • Identity – A critical but neglected construct in cognitive-behaviour therapy

    2023, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Dr. Jack Rachman's contributions to our understanding and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    2023, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Meanwhile, Rachman and colleagues identified a type of appraisal they labelled “thought-action fusion”. Rachman (1993, 1997; Rachman, Thordarson, Shafran, & Woody, 1995) observed that in addition to beliefs about responsibility people with OCD are more likely to believe that the more one has an unacceptable thought the more likely the negative event represented in the thought is of coming true, and that having a morally repugnant thought is the moral equivalent to committing a morally repugnant deed. This sense of “thought action fusion” also manifests in beliefs that “Obsessional thoughts indicate something significant about oneself (e.g., that one is terrible, weird, abnormal)” and “Negative intrusive thoughts must be important merely because they have occurred” (Thordarson & Shafran, 2002 p. 15).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text