Behaviour therapy and obsessional ruminations: Can failure be turned into success?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(89)90073-9Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper considers the possible reasons for the relative failure of behavioural treatment for ‘ruminations’ (obsessional thoughts without overt compulsive behaviour). It is argued that this problem is due to an inadequate conceptualisation of the nature of ruminations and that, as a result, exposure and response prevention have not been applied effectively. Effective treatment of ruminations requires systematically applied exposure in conjunction with the identification and prevention of covert compulsive behaviours. The practical problems of implementing ‘covert exposure and response prevention’ are considered and a form of habituation training is described, which is designed to overcome these inadequacies. A series of single ease studies using this technique is presented.

References (23)

  • P. Emmelkamp et al.

    Treatment of harming obsessions

    Behav. Anal. Modif.

    (1980)
  • Cited by (156)

    • Does generic metacognition explain incremental variance in O–C symptoms beyond responsibility and perfectionism?

      2021, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is also supported by findings that reduction in generic metacognition was a strong predictor of treatment outcome in OCD patients (Solem et al., 2009). MCT seems to be a promising addition to OCD treatment recommendations, or an alternative to ERP addressing the limitations of ERP such as high attrition rates (Ong et al., 2016) and limited effectiveness in obsessive ruminations without covert rituals (Salkovskis & Westbrook, 1989). MCT focusing on altering generic metacognition presented across psychopathologies may be particularly suitable for a mental disorder that is highly heterogeneous and often accompanies comorbid diagnoses like OCD.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text