Enduring deficits after remissions of depression: A test of the scar hypothesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(88)90114-3Get rights and content

Abstract

People who have recovered from an episode of clinical depression have an elevated risk for developing a new episode of depression compared with those not previously depressed. One possible explanation for this finding is that depression may leave ‘scars’—enduring psychological changes resulting from depression. This hypothesis was examined for a set of interpersonal variables which measured self-perceptions, behavior observed in dyadic and group interactions, and ratings by peers and coders based on those interactions. The ‘scar’ pattern was defined as a deficit observed during depression which remained after the depressive episode ended. Data for 21 patients who improved during psychotherapy, 20 patients who did not improve, and 80 nondepressed participants were examined. No variables fit the ‘scar’ pattern. Seven variables were identified as concomitants of depression. Nine variables provided predictive information, in that patients who subsequently improved in treatment significantly differed at pre-test from patients who subsequently failed to improve. The failure to support the scar hypothesis is discussed, along with alternative explanation for the higher risk for a new depressive episode seen in the previously depressed. The importance of the finding that some measures of interpersonal behavior predict response to treatment is also discussed.

References (24)

  • C.S. Amenson et al.

    An investigation into the observed sex differences in prevalence of unipolar depression

    J. abnorm. Psychol.

    (1981)
  • R.J. Baldessarini

    Biomedical Aspects of Depression

    (1983)
  • J.C. Coyne

    Toward an interactional description of depression

    Psychiatry

    (1976)
  • J. Endicott et al.

    A diagnostic interview: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia

    Arch. gen. Psychiat.

    (1978)
  • R.P. Grinker et al.

    The Phenomena of Depression

    (1961)
  • G. Keppel

    Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook

    (1973)
  • P.M. Lewinsohn

    Do negative expectancies, irrational beliefs, and positive and negative thoughts predict improvement in cognitive-behavioral therapy?

    (1986)
  • P.M. Lewinsohn

    Manual of instructions for the behavior ratings used for the observation of interpersonal behavior: Revised version

    (1971)
  • P.M. Lewinsohn et al.

    A prospective study of risk factors for unipolar depression

    (1987)
  • P.M. Lewinsohn et al.

    An integrative theory of depression

  • P.M. Lewinsohn et al.

    The measurement of expectancies and other cognitions in depressed individuals

    Cogn. Ther. Res.

    (1982)
  • P.M. Leweinsohn et al.

    Social competence and depression: the role of illusory self-perceptions

    J. abnorm. Psychol.

    (1980)
  • Cited by (93)

    • The day-to-day relationship between self-esteem and depressive mood in Chinese culture

      2021, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      While previous studies suggest that self-esteem and depression are related, the direction of causal effects between them remains contested (Johnson et al., 2016; Orth & Robins, 2013; Sowislo & Orth, 2013). Low self-esteem increases depression (Beck, 1967; Butler et al., 1994; Metalsky et al., 1993; Roberts & Monroe, 1992), while depressive episodes may decrease self-esteem (Coyne & Whiffen, 1995; Rohde et al., 1990; Zeiss & Lewinsohn, 1988). Most longitudinal studies investigating the relationship between self-esteem and depression provide stronger support for the vulnerability model (i.e., low self-esteem predicts depression) than for the scar model (i.e., depression predicts low self-esteem; Orth & Robins, 2013).

    • Set Shifting and Inhibition Deficits as Potential Endophenotypes for Depression

      2021, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, it is unclear whether set-shifting is impaired prior to MDD onset, as prior findings have been mixed (Papmeyer et al., 2015; Stange et al., 2016). If set-shifting is only impaired in current and remitted MDD, it may be a consequence, or ‘scar,’ of MDD rather than an intermediate process involved in its pathophysiology (Zeiss and Lewinsohn, 1988). For example, it is possible that symptoms of depression may cause lasting damage to neural structures such as the prefrontal cortex, which subsequently contribute to deficits in executive functioning domains such as set-shifting.

    • State and trait hopelessness in a prospective five-year study of patients with depressive disorders

      2018, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fifth, we measured hopelessness in patients who already had a depressive disorder. Hence, we were unable to conclude whether trait hopelessness represents a characteristic existing before a first depressive episode, as Abramson et al (1989) suggested, or a “scars” phenomenon (Zeiss and Lewinsohn, 1988). We showed that patients with depressive disorder demonstrate both state and trait characteristics of hopelessness during the five-year follow-up.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text