The passing of the two-stage theory of fear and avoidance: Fresh possibilities

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(76)90066-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The two-stage theory of fear and avoidance is summarized and its relation to the two-factor theory of learning is noted. The major critical arguments and evidence are presented to show why the two-stage theory is inadequate. Some of the theoretical and clinical consequences of this conclusion, are presented and evaluated.

References (19)

  • R. Bolles

    Species-specific defense reactions in avoidance learning

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1970)
  • F. Brush

    The effect of shock intensity on the acquisition and extinction of an avoidance response in dogs

    J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.

    (1957)
  • J. Gray

    The Psychology of Fear and Stress

    (1971)
  • H. Harlow

    Motivational forces underlying learning

  • R. Herrnstein

    Method and theory in the study of avoidance

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1969)
  • R. Hodgson et al.

    II. Desynchrony in measures of fear

    Behav. Res. & Therapy

    (1974)
  • P. Lang

    Stimulus control, response control and desensitization of fear

  • I. Marks

    Perspectives on flooding

    Seminars in Psychiatry

    (1972)
  • N. Miller

    Learnable drives and rewards

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text
Copyright © 1976 Published by Elsevier Ltd.