Sensitivity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy according to type of cardiac disease
References (30)
Injection plus dissection study of coronary artery occlusions and anastamoses
Am Heart J
(1938)- et al.
Descriptive characteristic of the electrocardiogram from autopsied men free of cardiopulmonary disease: a basis for evaluating criteria for ventricular hypertrophy
Am J Cardiol
(1983) - et al.
A reevaluation of electrocardiographic criteria for left, right and combined ventricular hypertrophy
Am J Cardiol
(1984) - et al.
Electrocardiographic changes due to cardiac enlargement
Am Heart J
(1971) Das Elektrokardiogram. Theorie und Klink
- et al.
Electrocardiographic left atrial enlargement: electrophysiologic, echocardiographic and hemodynamic correlates
Am J Cardiol
(1977) - et al.
Electrocardiographic changes reflecting left atrial abnormality in hypertension
Circulation
(1966) - et al.
Analysis of the P wave in severe aortic stenosis
Dis Chest
(1966) - et al.
Evaluation of electrocardiographic diagnosis of ventricular hypertrophy based on autopsy comparison
Circulation
(1960) The correlation between electrocardiographic patterns of ventricular hypertrophy and the anatomic findings
Circulation
(1960)
A critical appraisal of the electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy
Circulation
Heart weight and assessment of ventricular hypertrophy
The weight of the human heart. I. Normal “cases”
Arch Path
Left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with chronic bronchitis and emphysema
Ann Intern Med
Recommendations for standardization of leads and specification for instruments in electrocardiography and vectorcardiography
Circulation
Cited by (52)
Absence of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy in patients undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with increased mortality
2020, Journal of ElectrocardiologyCitation Excerpt :LVH regression has been demonstrated following successful surgical and/or transcatheter aortic valve replacement [5–7]. LVH diagnosis traditionally relies on the electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment [8]; however, ECG LVH generally has low sensitivity and varies depending on the study population [9,10]. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that electrocardiography may not have significant correlation with LV mass in the TAVR population [4].
Frontal QRS-T angle and World Health Organization classification for body mass index
2018, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Leftward shift of QRS axis with aging is explained by changes on thorax geometry or increased fibrosis and fatty infiltration in the conduction system [20–23]. Leftward shift of QRS axis with LV hypertrophy is well recognized [9,10]. Notably, we have recently found that QRS axis is inversely associated with BMI [7].
The Enduring Role of the Electrocardiogram as a Diagnostic Tool in Cardiology
2017, Journal of the American College of CardiologyValidity of the surface electrocardiogram criteria for right ventricular hypertrophy: The mesa-rv study (multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis-right ventricle)
2014, Journal of the American College of CardiologyElectrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy
2012, American Journal of CardiologyAHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram. Part V: Electrocardiogram Changes Associated With Cardiac Chamber Hypertrophy A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society
2009, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :In a large group of patients with mild or moderate hypertension, only 11.2% of patients with LVH by either the Cornell voltage criterion or the Sokolow-Lyon criterion had LVH diagnosed by both criteria (16). In addition, the various criteria have different positive and negative predictive values in different patient populations (17), suggesting that the value of multiple criteria may be additive. Published studies are currently insufficient to indicate whether any of the more recently proposed criteria are clearly superior to the others or are simply redundant.