The role of vision in repetitive circle drawing
References (19)
- et al.
Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task
Acta Psychologica
(1991) - et al.
The role of proprioceptive information for the production of isometric forces and for handwriting tasks
Acta Psychologica
(1993) - et al.
The independent monitoring of form and scale factors in handwriting
Acta Psychologica
(1983) - et al.
A visual representation and the control of manual aiming movements
Journal of Motor Behavior
(1990) - et al.
Evidence of common timing processes in the control of manual, orofacial and speech movements
Journal of Motor Behavior
(1992) - et al.
The movement speed-accuracy relationship in space-time
The neural and behavioral organization of goal-directed movements
(1988)- et al.
Modular analysis of timing in motor skill
- et al.
Force control and its relation to timing
Journal of Motor Behavior
(1987)
Cited by (30)
Limb position drift results from misalignment of proprioceptive and visual maps
2017, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :This finding appeared paradoxical because it indicates that proprioceptive information was accurate for modulating muscle activations with drift-dependent changes in limb configuration, but this detailed information about limb configuration was not used in order to prevent limb position drift. In a related study, Zelaznick and Lantero (1996) showed that when subjects repetitively moved their hand in a continuous circular motion in the absence of visual feedback, the average limb position drifted while the shape of the hand path was maintained. While that study did not analyze inverse dynamics, one would expect that in order to maintain the shape of the hand path while the limb drifted would require modifications to the muscle activations in accord with drift in limb configuration.
Bimanual coordination with three hands: Is the mirror hand of any help?
2014, NeuropsychologiaManual disfluency in drawing while producing and listening to disfluent speech
2013, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :That is, they were able to perform the task without looking at the digitizer tablet. Research has shown that the absence of visual feedback during the drawing of circles does not affect the timing or shape of the circle (Zelaznik & Lantero, 1996). Furthermore, participants did not receive any instructions pertaining to the size, speed, or the amount of pen pressure to exert while drawing the circles.
Synchronization in repetitive smooth movement requires perceptible events
2011, Acta PsychologicaCitation Excerpt :In circle drawing, the printed timing target (usually placed at the 12 o'clock position) provides only a visual indication of when a cycle ends, but no haptic or auditory event-related feedback at the timing target. Zelaznik and Lantero (1996) showed that removal of visual feedback did not change timing accuracy in circle drawing, indicating that visual information may not be as useful for timing as auditor or tactile information. Furthermore, there are no abrupt kinematic changes at the location of the timing target for circle drawing (and thus no event) at the timing target.
Differential levels of speech and manual dysfluency in adults who stutter during simultaneous drawing and speaking tasks
2009, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :Participants were asked to draw the continuous circles at a comfortable size and speed. Zelaznik and Lantero (1996) showed that when drawing circles, removal of vision did not affect timing or shape of the circle. As such, the drawing was highly automated and could be done without the participants looking at the digitizer tablet while they concentrated on reading the text.