Elsevier

Acta Psychologica

Volume 46, Issue 2, November 1980, Pages 81-94
Acta Psychologica

A watched pot sometimes boils: a study of duration experience

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(80)90001-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The ‘watched pot’ phenomenon — the lengthening of duration experience when one is attentively and perhaps impatiently waiting for some event to occur — was studied in three experiments. In them, each observer attended for a duration of 270 sec to a liquid-containing beaker on an electrical burner. Observers who were told that the experiment concerned time perception (prospective paradigm) reproduced the duration as longer than those told that it concerned visual perception (retrospective paradigm). In the prospective paradigm, reproductions were longer if the liquid did not boil than if it did, and an interruption (task-unrelated questioning) shortened reproductions if the liquid did not boil but had no effect if it did. In the retrospective paradigm, if there was boiling or questioning or both, reproductions were longer than if there was neither. Results have implications for hypotheses about duration experience.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Measuring subjectively experienced time in usability and user experience testing scenarios

    2020, International Journal of Human Computer Studies
    Citation Excerpt :

    When less compared to all attention is available to manage the timing task, verbal estimates of clock time tend to be shorter. The effect has been shown for events redirecting attention away from the timing task (Block et al., 1980) and for secondary tasks (Brown, 1997). Moreover, the strength of temporal distortion due to secondary tasks can be amplified by the secondary task's inherent mental workload (Block et al., 2010; Brown, 1985).

  • What happens while waiting? How self-regulation affects boredom and subjective time during a real waiting situation

    2020, Acta Psychologica
    Citation Excerpt :

    In general, waiting without being able to perform an activity and only being occupied with one's own thoughts is not experienced as a pleasant situation (Wilson et al., 2014; for a critical discussion of this interpretation: Fox, Thompson, Andrews-Hanna, & Christoff, 2014; Pfeifer, Geyer, Storch, & Wittmann, 2019). In these instances, time seems to pass very slowly because one's attention is focused on the present moment without any pleasant distraction (e.g. while waiting for a pot to boil, Block et al., 1980). The waiting paradigm employed in the present study is based on a recent investigation which demonstrated that the impulsive present orientation of an individual confined in a waiting situation leads to stronger negative affect and to a deceleration of subjective time experience (Jokic et al., 2018).

  • Time-based prospective memory in adults with developmental dyslexia

    2016, Research in Developmental Disabilities
    Citation Excerpt :

    Given reports of dyslexia-related deficits in temporal processing and time perception (e.g., Bruno & Maguire, 1993; Khan et al., 2014; Klein, 2002; Nicolson, Fawcett, & Dean, 1995; Tallal, 1980; Wolff, 2002), the reduced number of time checks might reflect difficulties with temporal processing or an awareness of how time was passing. Whilst such temporal processing problems have been recorded in the millisecond range which is associated with “internal clock” models of time perception (e.g., Wearden, 1999, 2001), they have not been explored over the longer durations which more cognitive processes to be involved (e.g., Block, George, & Reed, 1980; Thomas & Brown, 1975; Thomas & Weaver, 1975). It may be that dyslexia-related temporal processing difficulties influence performance over the durations typically involved in TBPM and this could be an avenue for future research to take.

  • Oscillatory multiplexing of neural population codes for interval timing and working memory

    2015, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    Subjective time can be modulated by various factors; one of those being cognitive load which has been shown to affect timing and time perception in multiple (concurrent) task designs (e.g., Block and Zakay, 1997; Block et al., 2010; Brown, 1997). Findings show that subjective time tends to pass more quickly in difficult or attention-demanding situations such as those present in a high-load working memory task, while time is perceived to pass more slowly in less attentional-demanding situations (Block and Zakay, 2008; Block et al., 1980; Brown, 2008). However, these findings differ depending on whether participants are required to make a prospective duration judgment (participants are required to attend to stimulus duration prior to or immediately upon the onset of the to-be-timed signal) or a retrospective duration judgment (participants are not required to attend to the duration of a stimulus during the task, but instead are asked to provide a duration judgment following task completion).

  • Acceptance of self-service check-in at Zurich airport

    2011, Research in Transportation Business and Management
View all citing articles on Scopus

Marjorie A. Reed University of Oregon.

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Lois Todd, who was an experimenter in experiments 2 and 3, and Robert Schartmann, who was an experimenter in experiment 3. We also thank Douglas Kenrick for suggesting the Rosenthal (1978) analysis.

View full text