Mandatory bicycle helmet use following a decade of helmet promotion in Victoria, Australia—An evaluation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(94)90006-XGet rights and content

Abstract

On July 1, 1990, a law requiring wearing of an approved safety helmet by all bicyclists (unless exempted) came into effect in Victoria, Australia. Some of the more important steps that paved the way for this important initiative (believed to be the first statewide legislation of its type in the world) are described, and the initiative's effects are analysed. There was an immediate increase in average helmet-wearing rates from 31% in March 1990 to 75% in March 1991, although teenagers continued to show lower rates than younger children and adults. The number of insurance claims from bicyclists killed or admitted to hospital after sustaining a head injury decreased by 48% and 70% in the first and second years after the law, respectively. Analysis of the injury data also showed a 23% and 28% reduction in the number of bicyclists killed or admitted to hospital who did not sustain head injuries in the first and second post-law years, respectively. For Melbourne, where regular annual surveys of helmet wearing have been conducted, it was possible to fit a logistic regression model that related the reduction in head injuries to increased helmet wearing. Surveys in Melbourne also indicated a 36% reduction in bicycle use by children during the first year of the law and an estimated increase in adult use of 44%.

References (22)

  • M. Williams

    The protective performance of bicyclist helmets in accidents

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (1991)
  • T. Wood et al.

    Head injuries to pedal cyclists and the promotion of helmet use in Victoria, Australia

    Accid. Anal. Prev.

    (1988)
  • BMDP Inc.

    BMDP statistical software manual

  • M. Cameron et al.

    Evaluation of the bicycle helmet wearing law in Victoria during its first 12 months

  • M.M. Dorsch et al.

    Do bicycle safety helmets reduce severity of head injury in real crashes?

    (1984)
  • A.E. Drummond et al.

    The risks of bicyclist accident involvement Report no. 2

    (1988)
  • A.E. Drummond et al.

    The behaviour and crash involvement risk of child pedestrians and bicyclists: A traffic exposure study

  • C.F. Finch et al.

    Bicycle use and helmet wearing rates in Melbourne, 1987 to 1992

  • Hansard
  • D.J. Healy

    Trends in helmet usage rates and bicyclist numbers sustaining head injury—July 1981 to December 1985—Victoria

  • L. Heiman

    Bicycle helmet usage surveys of primary and secondary school children, adult commuter and recreational cyclists 1983–1987

  • Cited by (151)

    • Cycling-related trauma admissions to the major trauma centre in the cycling capital of the United Kingdom

      2022, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      A common argument against this is that it may not be effective in reducing serious injuries and may even reduce the number of people cycling, thereby producing a net negative effect on population health. Bicycle helmet legislation has been introduced in Australia and New Zealand, and the reported effect has been mixed, ranging from a deterrence effect [37,38], to a children-only decrease [39], and no detrimental effect [40]. It is likely that mandatory bicycle helmet legislation represents only a small contribution to the attractiveness of cycling, and that other factors (cycle lanes and government campaigns) are confounding.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text