Abstract
While the role of and consequences of being a bystander to face-to-face homophobic bullying has received some attention in the literature, to date, very little is known about the relationship between witnessing and perpetrating homophobic cyberbullying. It is also unknown how empathy and toxic online disinhibition might impact the association between witnessing and perpetrating homophobic cyberbullying. The present study focused on examining the longitudinal association between witnessing and perpetrating homophobic cyberbullying, and the potentially moderating role of empathy and toxic online disinhibition in this relationship. There were 1067 adolescents (age range from 12 through 15) included in this study, and they answered questionnaires about empathy, toxic online disinhibition, homophobic cyberbullying involvement (witnessing, perpetration), and face-to-face homophobic bullying involvement (witnessing, perpetration). One year later, adolescents also completed a questionnaire on the perpetration of homophobic cyberbullying. Results revealed an association between witnessing homophobic cyberbullying and homophobic cyberbullying perpetration, as measured over one year, while controlling for face-to-face homophobic bullying involvement. Further, empathy and toxic online disinhibition moderated the relationship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094592.
Almeida, A., Correia, I., Marinho, S., & Garcia, D. (2008). Virtual but not less real: a study of cyber bullying and its relations with moral disengagement and empathy. In Q. Li, D. Cross, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: research from international perspectives (pp. 243–244). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Antonio, R., Guerra, R., & Moleiro, C. (2018). Stay away or stay together? Social contagion, common identity, and bystanders’ interventions in homophobic bullying episodes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations., 136843021878274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218782741.
Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2137.
Batson, C. D. (2009). Two forms of perspective taking: imagining how another feels and imagining how you would feel. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 267–279). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x.
Charaschanya, A., & Blauw, J. (2017). A study of the direct and indirect relationships between online disinhibition and depression and stress being mediated by the frequency of cyberbullying from victim and perpetrator perspectives. Scholar: Human Sciences, 9(2), 275–301.
Eisenberg, N., & Strayer, J. (1987). Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., & Mathy, R. (1989). Relation to sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: a multimethod study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-351457.1.55.
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q., & Carlo, G. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.993.
Elipe, P., de la Oliva Munoz, M., & Del Rey, R. (2018). Homophobic bullying and cyberbullying: a study of a silence problem. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(5), 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1333809.
Erreygers, S., Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H., & Baillien, E. (2016). Helping behavior among adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying: the role of impulsivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.003.
Espelage, D. L., Low, S., Van Ryzin, M. J., & Polanin, J. R. (2015). Clinical trial of second step middle school program: impact on bullying, cyberbullying, homophobic teasing, and sexual harassment perpetration. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-15-0052.1.
Festl, R., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2013). Peer influence, internet use and cyberbullying: a comparison of different context effects among German adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 7(4), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2013.781514.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816.
Huang, Y., & Chou, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1581–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005.
Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye- contract on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 4343–4443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014.
Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2013). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2135.
Meyer, E. J. (2008). Gendered harassment in secondary schools: understanding teachers’ (non)interventions. Gender and Education, 20, 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802213115.
Miller, B., & Morris, R. G. (2016). Virtual peer effects in social learning theory. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1543–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714526499.
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002.
Orue, I., & Calvete, E. (2018). Homophobic bullying in schools: the role of homophobic attitudes and exposure to homophobic aggression. School Psychology Review, 47, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0063.V47-1.
Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., & Bastiaensens, S. (2016). Exposure to cyberbullying as a bystander: an investigation of desensitization effects among early adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.022.
Poteat, V. P., DiGiovanni, C. D., & Scheer, J. R. (2013). Predicting homophobic behavior among heterosexual youth: domain general and sexual orientation-specific factors at the individual and contextual level. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(3), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9813-4.
Prati, G. (2012a). A social cognitive learning theory of homophobic aggression among adolescents. School Psychology Review, 41, 413–428.
Prati, G. (2012b). Development and psychometric properties of the homophobic bullying scale. Education and Psychological Measurement, 72(4), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412440169.
Rivers, I., Poteat, V. P., Noret, N., & Ashurst, N. (2009). Observing bullying at school: the mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018164.
Rösner, L., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Verbal venting in the social web: effects of anonymity and group norms on aggressive language use in online comments. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 205630511666422. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664220.
Salmivalli, C. (2014). Participant roles in bullying: how can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222.
Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2013). Is cyberbullying relate to lack of empathy and social-emotional problems? International Journal of Developmental Science, 7, 161–166. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-130124.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.
Spreng, N. R., McKinnon, M., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381.
Steffgen, G., Konig, A., Pfretsch, J., & Melzer, A. (2011). Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents’ cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 643–648. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0445.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–326.
Tear, J., & Michalska, K. J. (2010). Neurodevelopmental changes in the circuits underlyin empathy and sympathy from childhood to adulthood. Developmental Science, 13, 886–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00940.x.
Tynes, B., Reynolds, L., & Greenfield, P. M. (2004). Adolescence, race, and ethnicity on the Internet: a comparison of discourse in monitored vs. unmonitored chat rooms. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology: An International Lifespan Journal, 25(6), 667–684.
Udris, R. (2014). Cyberbullying among high school students in Japan: development and validation of the Online Disinhibition Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.036.
Van Cleemput, K., Vandebosch, H., & Pabian, S. (2014). Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21534.
Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11, 1349–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341263.
Voggeser, B. J., Singh, R. K., & Göritz, A. S. (2018). Self-control in online discussions: disinhibited online behavior as a failure to recognize social cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02372.
Wachs, S. (2012). Moral disengagement and emotional and social difficulties in bullying and cyberbullying: differences by participant role. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704318.
Wang, C., Lin, H., Chen, M., Ko, N., Chang, Y., Lin, I., & Cheng-Fang, Y. (2018). Effects of traditional and cyber homophobic bullying in childhood on depression, anxiety, and physical pain in emerging adulthood and the moderating effects of social support among gay and bisexual men in Taiwan. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 14, 1309–1317. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S164579.
Wright, M. F. (2014). Predictors of anonymous cyber aggression: the role of adolescents’ beliefs about anonymity, aggression, and the permanency of digital content. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 17(7), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0457.
Wright, M. F., Harper, B. D., & Wachs, S. (2018). The associations between cyberbullying and callous-unemotional traits among adolescents: the moderating effect of online disinhibition. Personality and Individual Differences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Before recruiting schools, ethics approval for the study was granted to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, M.F., Wachs, S. Does Empathy and Toxic Online Disinhibition Moderate the Longitudinal Association Between Witnessing and Perpetrating Homophobic Cyberbullying?. Int Journal of Bullying Prevention 3, 66–74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00042-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00042-6