Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are You Distracted by Pleasure? Practice Mindfulness Meditation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cognitive Enhancement Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness improves attentional control and regulates emotion. In the current study, two experiments were conducted to examine the role of sustained mindfulness practice in attentional capture by emotional distractors in different perceptual load conditions. Individuals with previous experience in mindfulness meditation and those without meditation experience participated. Participants were required to identify and respond to a target letter in a visual search task in high and low perceptual load conditions. They were instructed to ignore the distractors (Experiment 1: happy or angry faces; Experiment 2: pleasurable or unpleasurable IAPS images), which were present in 25% of total trials. Results indicated that distractors with positive emotional information captured the attention and interfered with the task performance of non-meditators in the high-load condition. However, mindfulness meditators reduced the interference from positive emotional information in the high-load condition. Moreover, mindfulness meditators processed negative emotional distractors more than non-meditators without compromising the visual-search performance in the high-load condition. Given that processing negative emotion requires more attentional resources than processing positive emotion, it may show that mindfulness meditators have more attentional resources. Additionally, those who practiced mindfulness meditation reported greater psychological well-being and fewer depressive symptoms. The findings suggest that mindfulness might improve attentional control for positive and pleasurable distractors. It reflects a diminished need in meditators to seek satisfaction from external pleasurable distractions. The findings have practical implications for managing hedonic compulsive behaviors and theoretical implications for understanding the interactive role of emotion and attention in mindfulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Attentional capture refers to a momentary shift of attention when an unexpected or infrequent object is presented, even when subjects are unaware of the stimulus. Experimental studies of attentional capture (more specifically, implicit capture of attention) often index a change in performance on the primary task, e.g., an increase in reaction time, distractor interference score or a decrease in accuracy (Forster & Lavie, 2008a; Simons, 2000).

  2. Of the total 18 participants excluded from Experiment 1 of the present study, three participants were left-handed (1 MM, 2 NM), and two explicitly reported being distracted by the external environment (1 MM, 1 NM). One participant attempted the study twice (1 NM); data from the first attempt could not be considered for analysis as the participant completed only the experiment (letter search task) on the first attempt and left the questionnaire unfilled. Two participants were removed because they could not understand the task properly (2 MM), which they mentioned in their feedback. Two more participants’ overall reaction time data showed high variability, indicating either anticipatory or slow responding (1 MM, 1 NM). Eight participants had high error rates (M > 25%; 6 MM, 2 NM), which might mean the failure to understand the task correctly or an inability to pay attention to the task (Gupta et al., 2016). We recognize that the high number of exclusions could be due to the use of an online platform where the external distractions increased, and control and understanding of the task decreased. Even with such a high number, the participants in the final analysis were well within the required sample size indicated by the G-Power analysis. NM = non-meditator, MM = mindfulness meditator.

  3. To test if the results of the two experiments suggested an actual reduction in emotional interference in the mindfulness meditator group and not just a speed-accuracy trade-off strategy adopted by the group, an index of distraction was generated for accuracy similar to DI for reaction time. Accuracy for emotional stimuli was subtracted from accuracy for no-distractor condition. The results of three-way mixed ANOVA did not reveal any group differences in Experiment 1 (F(1,67) = 0.002, p = 0.96) and Experiment 2 (F(1,65) = 0.007, p = 0.93).

  4. There was an apparent gender disparity between both groups, with more females in the mindfulness meditator group and more males in the non-meditator group participating in the study. Hence, further statistical analysis was applied to the final sample in each experiment to test whether the gender differences affected the distractor interference results. A four-way mixed ANOVA was performed on DI using load (high, low) and distractor condition (positive, negative) as within-group factors and group (mindfulness meditator, non-meditator) and gender (male, female) as between-group factors. There was no main effect of gender, and gender did not interact with any other variable in Experiment 1 (p > 0.07, for all) and Experiment 2 (p > 0.08, for all).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the fellowship from the University Grant Commission (378/(NET-NOV2017)) to Ms. Surabhi Lodha and IRCC, IITB seed grant to Prof. Gupta.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, SL and RG; Methodology, SL and RG; Formal analysis, SL and RG; Investigation, SL and RG; Resources, SL and RG; Data collection, SL; Data analysis, SL and RG; Writing, SL and RG; Funding acquisition, RG.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashmi Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Link to Download Data

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWYZe_7isdJ0__t1u3UKP984Hl7ZCchv/edit?usp=sharg&ouid=116860749134629143023&rtpof=true&sd=true

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lodha, S., Gupta, R. Are You Distracted by Pleasure? Practice Mindfulness Meditation. J Cogn Enhanc 7, 61–80 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-023-00257-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-023-00257-y

Keywords

Navigation