Skip to main content
Log in

Interrater Reliability and Convergent Validity of the Trial-Based Functional Analysis

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The standard functional analysis (FA) has been regarded as the gold standard to identify the function of challenging behavior. The trial-based functional analysis (TBFA) is an alternative FA that takes less time to complete than the standard FA. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate interrater reliability and convergent validity of the TBFA by comparing it with the standard FA.

Method

First, TBFA and standard FA were conducted on three young adults with neurodevelopmental disorders who displayed problem behavior. Then, three expert panelists analyzed and compared graphs depicting TBFA with 5, 10, 15, and 20 trials and standard FA graphs.

Results

Panelists reported that they were able to identify a behavior function using the TBFA; however, interrater reliability was substantially lower with 5 trials than for 10, 15, or 20 trials, and was highest with 10 trials. Results suggest that reliability of the TBFA may be improved by including more than five trials in the analysis. Results of the TBFA and standard FA converged for only one of the three participants. Lack of convergence may have been due, in part, to differences in presentation of establishing operations between the two assessments.

Conclusions

Although preliminary, it is possible that clinicians should consider using more than 5 trials when interpreting the function of problem behavior using the TBFA. Limitations and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AD was responsible for setting up the study, acquiring and analyzing the data, and writing the manuscript. MT and AGF collaborated in setting up the study and/or analyzing the data and writing/editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Art Dowdy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at Temple University in Philadelphia, PA. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent for the participants’ involvement in the study was obtained from them or their legal representatives.

Additional information

We thank the reviewers for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

Standard Functional Analyses (DOCX 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dowdy, A., Tincani, M. & Fisher, A.G. Interrater Reliability and Convergent Validity of the Trial-Based Functional Analysis. Adv Neurodev Disord 5, 61–70 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-020-00174-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-020-00174-7

Keywords

Navigation