Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Youth Anti-Racist Engagement: Conceptualization, Development, and Validation of an Anti-Racism Action Scale

  • Quantitative Review
  • Published:
Adolescent Research Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Scholarship on youth engagement indicates that adolescents address social issues of public concern, but it is not clear how youth challenge racism. This gap in the literature stems from indirect conceptualizations and a lack of quantitative measurement of adolescents’ acts to oppose racism. Correspondingly, this study presents the validation of a measure of youth anti-racism action. Study 1 describes the youth participatory approach used in the development of the Anti-Racism Action Scale and presents the results from an exploratory factor analysis that examined the measure’s initial factor structure and reliability. The factor structure of the 22-item measure was explored with a diverse sample of adolescents (Mage = 16.00, SD = 1.18; 61.7% girls, Black/African American [29.3%], Asian/South Asian [21.1%], White/European American [24.4%], Arab/Middle-Eastern [17.5%], Latino/Hispanic [4.5%], and Multiracial [3.3%]) enrolled in a race dialogue program (n = 249). The results indicated the measure consisted of three subscales: Interpersonal Action, Communal Action, and Political Change Action. In Study 2, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with an independent, nationally representative sample of youth (n = 384) from diverse backgrounds (Mage = 17.00, SD = 1.29, 51.0% girls, White/European American [26.1%], Black/African American [25.6%], Latino/Hispanic [19.3%], Asian/Pacific Islander [13.6%], Multiracial [9.9%], Native American [5.2%] and “other” [0.3%]). The results confirmed a three-factor model that resulted in a 16-item measure. Furthermore, tests of convergent validity tests were pursued between the Anti-Racism Action Scale and the Critical Consciousness Scale, a widely used measure of youths’ awareness of the structural causes of various forms of oppression, sense of sociopolitical agency, and social action. This study suggests that youth engagement in anti-racism is multidimensional and that notion of adolescent social action are more diverse than represented in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. Youth were given the option to select among these ethnic-racial categories in Study 1 because they represented the ethnic-racial demographics of the program participants. Thus, these categories are different from the racial/ethnic categories assessed in Study 2.

References

  • Aldana, A., Rowley, S. J., Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2012). Raising ethnic-racial consciousness: The relationship between intergroup dialogues and adolescents’ ethnic-racial identity and racism awareness. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(1), 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsano, A. B. (2005). Youth civic engagement in the United States: Understanding and addressing the impact of social impediments on positive youth and community development. Applied Development Science, 9, 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bañales, J., Marchand, A. D., Skinner, O. D., Anyiwo, N., Rowley, S. J., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2019). Black adolescents’ critical reflection development: Parents’ racial socialization and attributions about race achievement gaps. Journal of Research on Adolescence. Advance online publication.​ https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bañales, J., Mathews, C. J., Hayat, N., Anyiwo, A., & Diemer, M. A. (2019). Latinx and Black young adults’ pathways to civic/political engagement. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000271.

  • Berman, G., & Paradies, Y. (2010). Racism, disadvantage and multiculturalism: Towards effective anti-racist praxis. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33, 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870802302272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, N. L., Meza, E. L., Romero, A. J., & Rodríguez, R. C. (2013). If there is no struggle, there is no progress: Transformative youth activism and the School of Ethnic Studies. The Urban Review, 45, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0220-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammarota, J., & Aguilera, M. (2012). “By the time I get to Arizona”: Race, language, and education in America’s racist state. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15, 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.674025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B. (1998). Involving young people in neighborhood development. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, 765–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-7409(98)00044-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway, B., & Aldana, A. (2013). Four forms of youth civic engagement for diverse democracy. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1894–1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christens, B. D. (2012). Toward relational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9483-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dei, G. J. S., & McDermott, M. (2014). Politics of anti-racism education: In search of strategies for transformative learning. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. New York: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diemer, M. A., & Li, C. (2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82, 1815–1833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01650.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diemer, M. A., McWhirter, E. H., Ozer, E. J., & Rapa, L. J. (2015). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of critical consciousness. Urban Review, 47, 809–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0336-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Park, C. J., & Perry, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of the critical consciousness scale. Youth and Society, 49, 461–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14538289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Voight, A. M., & McWhirter, E. H. (2016). Critical consciousness: A developmental approach to addressing marginalization and oppression. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, T., Lin, C., & Christens, B. D. (2005). Combining youth organizing and youth participatory action research to strengthen student voice in education reform. National Society for the Study of Education, 114, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9491-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Andrade, J. (2007). Gangstas, wankstas, and ridas: Defining, developing, and supporting effective teachers in urban schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701630767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Checkoway, B. (2011). Intergroup dialogue facilitation for youth empowerment and community change. In K. E. Maxwell, B. Nagda, & M. Thompson (Eds.), Facilitating intergroup dialogues: Bridging differences, catalyzing change (pp. 133–146). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. A., Syvertsen, A. K., & Stout, M. D. (2007). Civic measurement models: Tapping adolescents’ civic engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, S. K. (2008). Youth participatory evaluation: Strategies for engaging young people. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M., Mediratta, K., Ruglis, J., Stoudt, B., Shah, S., & Fine, M. (2010). Critical youth engagement: Participatory action research and organizing. In L. R. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta & C. A. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 621–649). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev. edn.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometrics: An introduction (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Coll, C., Lamberty, G., Jenkins, R., Mcadoo, H. P., Coll, C. G., Jenkins, R., & Mcadoo, H. P. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891–1914. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ginwright, S. (2011). Hope, healing, and care. Liberal Education, 97, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, J., & Trickett, E. J. (2014). Collaborative measurement development as a tool in CBPR: Measurement development and adaptation within the cultures of communities. American journal of community psychology, 54, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9655-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, E. C., Skoog, A. B., & Jagers, R. J. (2014). “It’ll never be the White kids, it’ll always be us”: Black high school students’ evolving critical analysis of racial discrimination and inequity in schools. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414550688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2011). Predictors of African American and European American adolescents’ endorsement of race-conscious social policies. Developmental Psychology, 47, 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. M., Bigler, R. S., & Levy, S. R. (2007). Consequences of learning about historical racism among European American and African American children. Child Development, 78, 1689–1705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01096.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences (3rd edn.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornbluh, M., Ozer, E. J., Allen, C. D., & Kirshner, B. (2015). Youth participatory action research as an approach to sociopolitical development and the new academic standards: Considerations for educators. Urban Review, 47, 868–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, S. S., Crick, N. R., Angelucci, J., Haye, K., Jawad, A. F., Grossman, M., & Power, T. J. (2006). Social cognition in context: Validating a cartoon-based attributional measure for urban girls. Child Development, 77, 1351–1358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00939.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. (2016). Racism in public or public racism: doing anti-racism in ‘post-racial’ times. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1096409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, E. H., & McWhirter, B. T. (2016). Critical consciousness and vocational development among Latina/o high school youth: Initial development and testing of a measure. Journal of Career Assessment, 24, 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., & Garran, A. M. (2017). Racism in the United States: Implications for the helping professions (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagda, B. R. A., & Gurin, P. (2007). Intergroup dialogue: A critical-dialogic approach to learning about difference, inequality, and social justice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P., Cammarota, J., & Ginwright, S. (2006). Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapa, L. J. (2016). Fostering marginalized youths’ academic achievement and critical consciousness through a values-affirmation intervention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education. East Lansing: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapa, L. J., Diemer, M. A., & Bañales, J. (2018). Critical action as a pathway to social mobility among marginalized youth. Developmental Psychology, 51, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards-Schuster, K., & Aldana, A. (2013). Learning to speak out about racism: Youths’ insights on participation in an intergroup dialogues program. Social Work With Groups, 36(4), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. W., & Miller, J. (2009). Discourses for social justice education: The web of racism and the web of resistance. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313200902874953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seider, S., Kelly, L., Clark, S., Jennett, P., El-Amin, A., Graves, D., et al. (2018). Fostering the sociopolitical development of African American and Latinx adolescents to analyze and challenge racial and economic inequality. Youth and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18767783(Online Release).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, R. Q., Ezeofor, I., Smith, L. C., Welch, J. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2016). The development and validation of the contemporary critical consciousness measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoudt, B. G. (2009). The role of language & discourse in the investigation of privilege: Using participatory action research to discuss theory, develop methodology, & interrupt power. Urban Review, 41, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0093-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stovall, D. (2006). From hunger strike to high school: Youth development, social justice and school formation. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance! youth resistance and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweifach, J. (2009). Cross-cultural group work practice with African American and Jewish adolescents: JCC/READY. Social Work with Groups, 32, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609510802290941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, S. J. (2016). Accounting for whiteness through collaborative fiction. Research in Drama Education, 21, 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2016.1155404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, S. (2015). It seems like no one cares”: Participatory photo mapping to understand youth perspectives on property vacancy. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 390–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414547098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. J., Barrie, R., Brunner, J., Clawson, A., Hewitt, A., Jeremie-Brink, G., & Rowe-Johnson, M. (2014). Assessing critical consciousness in youth and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, M. E. (2009). Participatory action research and Critical Race Theory: Fueling spaces for nos-otras to research. Urban Review, 41, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0097-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J., Diemer, M. A., & Voight, A. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. In C. A. Flanagan & B. D. Christens (Eds.), Youth civic development: Work at the cutting edge (pp. 43–57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J., & Flanagan, C. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J., Griffith, D. M., & Abdul-Adil, J. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression—Theory and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022839818873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J., & Hipolito-Delgado, C. P. (2015). Thinking ourselves to liberation?: Advancing sociopolitical action in critical consciousness. Urban Review, 47, 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0341-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J., Williams, N. C., & Jagers, R. J. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023091024140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, R., & Whittaker, T. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Matthew A. Diemer for his thoughtful feedback on an early draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Work, California State University Dominguez Hill, 1000 E. Victoria Street, Carson, CA, 90747, USA

    Adriana Aldana & Katie Richards-Schuster

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA

    Josefina Bañales

  3. School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA

    Katie Richards-Schuster

Authors
  1. Adriana Aldana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Josefina Bañales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katie Richards-Schuster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AA conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript; JB participated in the study design, conducted the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript; KRS lead the measurement development, participated in the study design, and provided feedback on manuscript drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Aldana.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors report none.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

“The original online version of this article was revised: A sentence under the heading ‘Study 2: Confirmatory Factor Analysis’ has been corrected”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldana, A., Bañales, J. & Richards-Schuster, K. Youth Anti-Racist Engagement: Conceptualization, Development, and Validation of an Anti-Racism Action Scale. Adolescent Res Rev 4, 369–381 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00113-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00113-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation