Abstract
Teacher–student relationships are crucial to engagement and school success for youth. However, forging caring and supportive teacher–student relationships can be challenging. Further, engagement appears to decline along with achievement. Regardless of limited research reviews on teacher–student relationships, engagement, and achievement for school-aged students, there is an urgent need for reviews focused on youth and Latino youth in particular. This study synthesized 26 studies on teacher–student relationships, engagement, and achievement for non-Latino (16 studies) and Latino youth (10 studies). The findings were similar for non-Latino and Latino youth, with positive associations and engagement as a mediator. Teacher–student relationships (emotional support, instrumental help, clear expectations, and classroom safety) and student engagement (behavioral, emotional, and cognitive) were defined as multidimensional constructs. The findings primarily focused on emotional support and behavioral engagement. Both bodies of literature were theoretically driven (self-determination theory, ecological theory), employed surveys as the primary measure and reliable measures. There was a lack of studies with experimental, longitudinal design, qualitative methods, random sampling, power analyses and reported validity of the measures. Major differences included mixed results for the moderation effect of gender among non-Latino youth. The quality of the literature for non-Latino youth was relatively more rigorous and stronger.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Funding disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(37), 1–42.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278.
Balagna, R. M., Young, E. L., & Smith, T. B. (2013). School experiences of early adolescent Latinos/as at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(2), 101–121. (studies included in the review).
Bingham, G. E., & Okagaki, L. (2012). Ethnicity and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 65–95). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Blumenfeld, P. C., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Task factors, teacher behavior, and students’ involvement and use of learning strategies in science. Elementary School Journal, 88, 235–250. (studies included in the review).
Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., et al. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(4), 357.e9–357.e357.e18.
Brewster, A., & Bowen, G. L. (2004). Teacher support and school student engagement for Latino middle and high school students at-risk of school failure. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21, 47–67. (studies included in the review).
Brofenbrenner, U. (1993). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (2nd edn., pp. 37–43). New York: Freeman.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development. (Vol. 1, 6th edn., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.
Chang, J. (2015). The interplay between collectivism and social support processes among Asian and Latino American college students. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 6(1), 4–14.
Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the lifespan. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), The self in transition: From infancy to childhood (pp. 61–97). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-processes and development: The Minnesota symposia on child development (Vol. 23, pp. 43–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conner, J. O., & Pope, D. C. (2013). Not just robo-students: Why full engagement matters and how schools can promote it. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(9), 1426–1442. (studies included in the review).
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.
Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. Jr. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student–teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77(1), 60–81. (studies included in the review).
Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student–teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol 1, pp. 416–436). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1649–1660. (studies included in the review).
Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd edn., pp. 125–153). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? (pp. 199–210). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.
Elias, M. J., & Schwab, Y. (2006). From compliance to responsibility: Social and emotional learning and classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 309–341). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford.
Farmer, T. W., Lines, M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247–256. (studies included in the review).
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–119.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–161.
Gallagher, K., Kainz, K., Vernon-Feagans, L., & White, K. (2013). Development of student–teacher relationships in rural early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 520–528.
Garcia-Reid, P. (2007). Examining social capital as a mechanism for improving school engagement among low income Hispanic girls. Youth & Society, 39(2), 164–181. (studies included in the review).
Garcia-Reid, P., Reid, R. J., & Peterson, N. A. (2005). School student engagement among Latino youth in an urban middle school context valuing the role of social support. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 257–275. (studies included in the review).
Gehlbach, H., Brinkworth, M. E., & Harris, A. D. (2012). Changes in teacher–student relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 690–704.
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students’ relationships to motivation and academic achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43. (studies included in the review).
Green, G., Rhodes, J., Hirsch, A. H., Suárez-Orozco, C., & Camic, P. M. (2008). Supportive adult relationships and the student engagement of Latin American immigrant youth. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 393–412. (studies included in the review).
Gregory, A., Allen, J., Mikami, A., Hafen, C., & Pianta, R. (2014). Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychology in the Schools, 51(2), 143–163. (studies included in the review).
Halgunseth, L. C., Ispa, J. M., & Rudy, D. (2006). Parental control in Latino families: An integrated review of the literature. Child Development, 77(5), 1282–1297.
Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivation and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300–312.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644–661.
Katz, S. R. (1999). Teaching in tensions: Latino immigrant youth, their teachers, and the structures of schooling. Teachers College Record, 100, 809–840.
Kim, H. Y., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2015). The language of learning: The academic engagement of newcomer immigrant youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(2), 229–245.
Knight, G. P., & Hill, N. E. (1998). Measurement equivalence in research involving minority adolescents. In V. McLoyd & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological and theoretical issues (pp. 183–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Farb, A. (2012). Engagement across developmental periods. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 45–63). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Meece, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.
Michaels, M. L., Barr, A., Roosa, M. W., & Knight, G. P. (2007). Self-esteem: Assessing measurement equivalence in a multiethnic sample of youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27(3), 269–295.
Mireles-Rios, R., & Romo, L. F. (2010). Maternal and teacher interaction and student engagement in math and reading among Mexican American girls from a rural community. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32(3), 456–469. (studies included in the review).
Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 376–404. (studies included in the review).
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading, national assessment of educational progress at Grades 4 and 8. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/subject/publications/main2013/pdf/2014451.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2015.
Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35–58.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83–98. (studies included in the review).
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529.
Rumberger, R. W., & Rotermund, S. (2012). The relationship between engagement and high school dropout. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 491–513). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437–460. (studies included in the review).
Ryan, A. M., Shim, S., & Makara, K. A. (2013). Changes in academic adjustment and relational self-worth across the transition to middle school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(9), 1372–1384.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Shim, S., Cho, Y., & Wang, C. (2013). Classroom goal structures, social achievement goals, and adjustment in middle school. Learning and Instruction, 23, 69–77.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and dis-affection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581. (studies included in the review).
Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Coping during childhood and adolescence: A motivational perspective. In D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lerner & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 91–133). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Smith, T. B. (2010). Culturally congruent practices in counseling and psychotherapy: A review of research. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (3rd ed., pp. 439–450). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youth. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 1–40.
Suárez-Orozco, C., Rhodes, J., & Milburn, M. (2009). Unraveling the immigrant paradox student engagement and student disengagement among recently arrived immigrant youth. Youth & Society, 41(2), 151–185.
Suárez-Orozco, C., & Suárez-Orozco, M. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Suárez-Orozco, M., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2013). Taking perspective: Context, culture, and history. In M. G. Hernández, J. Nguyen, C. L. Saetermoe & C. Suárez-Orozco (Eds.), Frameworks and ethics for research with immigrants. New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 141, pp. 9–23).
Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-Cam, H. Z., Trucano, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2014). Enhancing students’ engagement: Report of a 3-year intervention with middle school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1195–1226. (studies included in the review).
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 730–745. (studies included in the review).
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524–551.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Swanson, J., & Reiser, M. (2008). Prediction of children’s academic competence from their effortful control, relationships, and classroom participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 67–77. (studies included in the review).
Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 294–319.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school student engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83, 877–895. (studies included in the review).
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, academic achievement motivation, and student engagement. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. (studies included in the review).
Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737.
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of classroom environment, school student engagement, and academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 633–662. (studies included in the review).
Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411–419. (studies included in the review).
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Students’ relationships with teachers as motivational contexts. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 301–322). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Wentzel, K. R. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and adolescence competence at school. In T. Wubbels, P. den Brok, J. van Tartwijk & J. Levy (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education: An overview of contemporary research (pp. 19–36). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Wentzel, K. R., Baker, S. A., & Russell, S. L. (2012). Young adolescents’ perceptions of teachers’ and peers’ goals as predictors of social and academic goal pursuit. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61(4), 605–633.
Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S., & Looney, L. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 193–202. (studies included in the review).
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, 6th ed., pp. 933–1002). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Wilkinson, L. C., & Marrett, C. B. (1985). Gender influences in classroom interaction. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Woolley, M. E., Kol, K. L., & Bowen, G. L. (2009). The social context of school success for Latino middle school students: Direct and indirect influences of teachers, family, and friends. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 43–70. (studies included in the review).
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Retrieved from http://ceep.indiana.edu/pdf/HSSSE_2006_Report.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2015.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks the anonymous reviewers and the journal editor for their especially valuable feedback.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author reports no conflict of interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y. Teacher–Student Relationships, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement for Non-Latino and Latino Youth. Adolescent Res Rev 3, 375–424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0069-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-017-0069-9