Abstract
Objectives
Previous research on ultimatum bargaining suggests a central role of emotion. More specifically, it is posited that proposers are motivated by fear to make fair offers and that responders are motivated by anger to reject unfair offers. Based on this research, several studies have examined the effect of a responder’s anger in both the responder and proposer. Our objective is to examine these effects and the factors that influence them.
Methods
Here, we review these studies investigating the intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of anger in ultimatum bargaining.
Results
Intrapersonal anger increases responders’ rejection rates. As in the broader literature on negotiation, the literature shows mixed effects of interpersonal anger in ultimatum bargaining. Studies have demonstrated that these effects might be influenced in part by the credibility of the responder’s anger and/or the relative power of the proposer. Results suggest that interpersonal anger is more effective when it is credible and when the responder is of a relatively high power position.
Conclusions
Taken together, these studies suggest a clear effect of intrapersonal anger and mixed results regarding the interpersonal effects of anger. Those mixed results found within the extant literature might be explained, in part, by credibility and power. It is also suggested that other factors (i.e. threat potential and race) may also play a role in the effectiveness of interpersonal anger.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, H., & Brett, J. M. (2015). Context matters: The social effects of anger in cooperative, balanced, and competitive negotiation situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 44–58.
Adams, R. B., Ambady, N., Macrae, C. N., & Kleck, R. E. (2006). Emotional expressiosn forecast approach-avoidance behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 179–188.
Andrade, E. B., & Ho, T. H. (2009). Gaming emotions in social interactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 539–552.
Berkowitz, L., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Toward an understanding of the determinants of anger. Emotion, 4, 107–130.
Camerer, C. (2011). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Behavioral Game Theory.
Camerer, C., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209–219.
Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204.
Craig, B. M., Nelson, N. L., & Dixson, B. J. (2019). Sexual selection, agonistic signaling, and the effect of beards on recognition of men's anger displays. Psychological Science, 30(5), 728–738.
Dixson, B. J., Rantala, M. J., Melo, E. F., & Brooks, R. C. (2017). Beards and the big city: Displays of masculinity may be amplified under crowded conditions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 259–264.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39(2), 171–188.
Ekman, P. (2003). Darwin, deception, and facial expression. In J. J. Campos, R. J. Davidson, & F. B. de Waal (Eds.), Emotions inside out (pp. 205–221). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Fabiansson, E. C., & Denson, T. F. (2012). The effects of intrapersonal anger and its regulation in economic bargaining. PLoS One, 7(12), e51595.
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785–791.
Felson, R. B. (1982). Impression management and the escalation of aggression and violence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(4), 245–254.
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., & Savin, N. E. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347–369.
Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geniole, S., MacDonell, E. T., & McCormick, C. M. (2017). The threat premium in economic bargaining. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 572–582.
Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly, Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.
Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experiemntal analysis of ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367–388.
Henrich, J. (2000). Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. American Economic Association, 90(4), 973–979.
Hinde, R. A. (1985). Expression and negotiation. In G. Zivin (Ed.), The development of expressive behavior: Biology-environment interactions (pp. 103–116). Orlando: Academic Press.
Hirshleifer, J. (1987). On the emotions as guarantors of therats and promises. In U. Dupre (Ed.), The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. 301–326). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). Facing prejudice: Implicit prejudice and the perception of facial threat. Psychological Science, 14(6), 640–643.
Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15(5), 342–345.
Huntingford, F. A., & Turner, A. K. (1987). Animal conflict. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 505–521.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2001). Social functions of emotions. In T. J. Maybe & G. A. Bonanno (Eds.), Emotions and social behavior: Currenty issues and future directions (pp. 192–213). New York: Guilford Press.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284.
Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Chen, S., & Kraus, M. W. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emergine principles and lines of inquiry. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 151–192.
Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314(5800), 829–832.
Kopelman, S., Rosette, A. S., & Thompson, L. (2006). The three faces of eve: Strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 81–101.
Kubota, J. T., Li, J., Bar-David, E., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2013). The price of racial bias: Intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game. Psychological Science, 24(2), 2498–2504.
Kumar, R. (1997). The role of affect in negotiation: An integrative overview. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33, 84–100.
Lelieveld, G., Van Dijk, E. V., Van Beest, I., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why anger and disappointment affect other's bargaining behavior differently: The moderating role of power and the mediating role of reciprocal and complementary emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(9), 1209–1221.
Mehu, M., Mortillaro, M., Banziger, T., & Scherer, K. (2012). Reliable facial muscle activation enhances recognizability and credibility of emotional expression. Emotion, 12(4), 701–715.
Morris, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: The social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 1–50). Amsterdam: JAI Press.
Nelissen, R. M., Leliveld, M. C., Van Dijk, E. V., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). Fear and guilt in proposers: Using emotions to explain offers in ultimatum bargaining. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 78–85.
Nesse, R. M. (2001). Natural selection and the capacity for subjective commitment. In R. M. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 1–44). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ortony, A. G., Clore, G., & Collins, A. (1990). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47(1), 223–243.
Pillutla, M. J., & Murnighan. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 208–224.
Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). Being fair or appearing fair: Strategic behavior in ultimatum barganing. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1408–1426.
Pinker, S. (1996). How the mind works. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reed, L. I., & DeScioli, P. (2017). The emotional moves of a rational actor: Smiles, scowls, and other credible messages. Games, 8(2).
Reed, L. I., DeScioli, P., & Pinker, S. A. (2014). The commitment function of angry facial expressions. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1511–1517.
Reed, L. I., Stratton, R., & Rambeas, J. D. (2018). Face value and cheap talk: How smiles can increase or decrease the credibility of our words. Evolutionary Psychology, 1–9.
Riley, J. G. (2001). Silver signals: Twenty-five yeras of screening and signaling. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 432–478.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.
Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Searcy, W., & Nowicki, S. (2005). The evolution of animal communication: Reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press.
Sell, A., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2014). The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 425–429.
Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human angry. Proceedings fo the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Attitudes and Social Cognitions, 6, 1061–1086.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.
Srivastava, J., Espinoza, F., & Fedorikhin, A. (2009). Coupling and decoupling of unfairness and anger in ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 475–489.
Straub, P., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(3), 345–364.
Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D., & Sznycer, D. (2008). Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. In A. J. Elliot, Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 251-271). Psychology press.
Van Dijk, E., & Vermunt, R. (2000). Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36(1), 1–25.
Van Dijk, E., Van Kleef, G. A., Steinel, W., & Van Beest, I. (2008). A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: When communicating anger pays and when it backfires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 600–614.
Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Manstead, S. R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 57–76.
Van Kleef, G. A., van Dijk, E., Steinel, W., Harinck, F., & van Beest, I. (2008). Anger in social conflict: Cross-situational comparisons and suggestions for the future. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(1), 13–30.
Van Leeuwen, B., Noussair, C. N., Offerman, T., Suetens, S., Van Veelen, M., & Van De Ven, J. (2018). Predictably anger -- facial cues provide a credible signal of destrutive behavior. Management Science, 64(7), 3352–3364.
Weg, E., & Zwick, R. (1994). Toward the settlement of the fairness issues in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 24(1), 19–34.
Yik, M. S. (1999). Interpretation of faces: A cross-cultural study of a prediction from Fridlund's theory. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 93–104.
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reed, L.I., Okun, S. & Cooley, C. The Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Effects of Anger in Ultimatum Bargaining. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 6, 236–248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00136-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00136-2