Abstract
Research using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) suggests that a positive bias toward thinness, rather than a negative bias toward fatness, might underlie implicitly assessed evaluative responding regarding body image. Because these results contrast with reports of widespread anti-fat attitudes, we aimed to clarify the nature of implicitly assessed evaluative body image responding by using stimuli more central to body image concerns. Seventy-five undergraduates (65.8 % female) completed two IRAPs to examine three aims: (1) create IRAPs sensitive to histories of self-oriented anti-fat responding by using attractiveness-, fear-, and disgust-based stimulus relations; (2) evaluate responses to the different types of stimulus relations on the IRAPs separately and compare them to each other; and (3) examine correlations among IRAP responding and self-report measures of disgust, fear of fatness, and eating pathology. Results showed that participants demonstrated a self-thin-attractive relational bias. Unexpectedly, respondents also showed a self-fat-attractive relational bias and did not display self-fat-disgusting or self-fat-fear responding. IRAP effects for self-thin-attractive stimulus relations were larger than those for self-fat-attractive stimulus relations, suggesting the pro-self bias on these two trial types was larger when relating to oneself as being thin than when relating to oneself as being overweight. Correlations with self-report measures were nonsignificant. Results are discussed in the context of gaining a better understanding of implicit evaluative body image responding and contextual variables that influence IRAP responding.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Throughout this manuscript, we use the terms bias, relational bias, and implicit bias to refer to relational responses that are emitted with high degrees of speed and/or accuracy because the specific stimulus relations involved in the responses have been derived or directly reinforced frequently in the past. In this way we do not use these terms to refer to the influence of unobserved mental constructs. For instance, an “implicit anti-fat relational bias” suggests that functionally similar relational responses involving negative responding toward overweight stimuli (e.g., being overweight is bad) are well-practiced, cohere with one’s relational history, and are emitted with relative ease and automaticity.
References
Anselmi, P., Vianello, M., & Robusto, E. (2013). Preferring thin people does not imply derogating fat people: A Rasch analysis of the implicit weight attitude. Obesity, 21, 261–265. doi:10.1002/oby.20085.
Bacon, L. (2010). Health at every size: The surprising truth about your weight (2nd ed.). Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169–177.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.
Berg, K. C., Peterson, C. B., Frazier, P., & Crow, S. C. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination and Eating Disorder Inventory Questionnaire: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45, 428–438. doi:10.1002/eat.20931.
Carels, R. A., & Musher-Eizenman, D. R. (2010). Individual differences and weight bias: Do people with an anti-fat bias have a pro-thin bias? Body Image, 7, 143–148. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.11.005.
Cassin, S. E., & von Ranson, K. M. (2005). Word lists for testing cognitive biases in eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review, 13, 216–220. doi:10.1002/erv.607.
Chambliss, H. O., Finley, C. E., & Blair, S. N. (2004). Attitudes toward obese individuals among exercise science students. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36, 468–474. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000117115.94062.E4.
Dalley, S. E., & Buunk, A. P. (2011). The motivation to diet in young women: Fear is stronger than hope. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 672–680. doi:10.1002/ejsp.816.
De Houwer, J. (2002). The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 115–133. doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(02)00024-1.
Drake, C. E., Kellum, K. K., Wilson, K. G., Luoma, J. B., Weinstein, J. H., & Adams, C. H. (2010). Examining the implicit relational assessment procedure: Four preliminary studies. The Psychological Record, 60, 81–86.
Durso, L. E., Latner, J. D., White, M. A., Masheb, R. M., Blomquist, K. K., Morgan, P. T., & Grilo, C. M. (2012). Internalized weight bias in obese patients with binge eating disorder: Associations with eating disturbances and psychological functioning. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45, 423–427. doi:10.1002/eat.20933.
Espeset, E., Gulliksen, K. S., Nordbø, R. H., Skårderud, F., & Holte, A. (2012). The link between negative emotions and eating disorder behaviour in patients with anorexia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 20, 451–460. doi:10.1002/erv.2183.
Fairburn, C. G., & Beglin, S. J. (2008). Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (6.0). In C. G. Fairburn (Ed.), Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Hussey, I., & Graddy, J. (2016). Exploring the behavioral dynamics of the implicit relational assessment procedure: The impact of three types of introductory rules. Psychological Record. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0173-4
Goldfarb, L. A., Dykens, E. M., & Gerrard, M. (1986). The Goldfarb Fear of Fat Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 329–332. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4903_21.
Golijani-Moghaddam, N., Hart, A., & Dawson, D. L. (2013). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Emerging reliability and validity data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2, 105–119. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.05.002.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B., & Banaji, M. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Springer.
Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 161–172. doi:10.1177/0146167203259930.
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2011). On the formation and persistence of implicit attitudes: New evidence from the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). The Psychological Record, 61, 391–410.
Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Vahey, N. (2012). Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 17–38. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2012.09.003.
Hussey, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015a). From relational frame theory to implicit attitudes and back again: Clarifying the link between RFT and IRAP research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 11–15. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.009.
Hussey, I., Daly, T., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015b). Life is good, but death ain’t bad either: Counter-intuitive implicit biases to death in a normative population. The Psychological Record. doi:10.1007/s40732-015-0142-3.
Hussey, I., Ní Mhaoileoin, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Ohtsuki, T., Kishita, N., Hughes, S., & Murphy, C. (2016). The IRAP is non-relative but not a-contextual: Changes to the contrast category influence men’s de-humanization of women. The Psychological Record. doi:10.1007/s40732-016-0171-6.
Hussey, I., Thompson, M., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015c). Interpreting and inverting with less cursing: A guide to interpreting IRAP data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 157–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.05.001.
Juarascio, A. S., Forman, E. M., Timko, C. A., Herbert, J. D., Butryn, M., & Lowe, M. (2011). Implicit internalization of the thin ideal as a predictor of increases in weight, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating. Eating Behaviors, 12, 207–213. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.04.004.
Lieberman, D. L., Tybur, J. M., & Latner, J. D. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, obesity stigma, and gender: Contamination psychology predicts weight bias for women, not men. Obesity, 20, 1803–1814. doi:10.1038/oby.2011.247.
Maroto Expósito, P., Hernández López, M., & Rodríguez Valverde, M. (2015). Assessment of implicit anti-fat and pro-slim attitudes in young women using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 15, 17–32.
Matlin, M. W. (2004). Pollyanna principle. In R. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 257–271). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
McKenna, I. M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2007). Testing the fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): The first study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7, 123–138.
Nicholson, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). Developing an implicit measure of disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: Examining the role of implicit disgust propensity and sensitivity in obsessive-compulsive tendencies. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43, 922–930.
Nicholson, E., Hopkins-Doyle, A., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, R. A. P. (2014). Psychopathology, anxiety or attentional control: Determining the variables which predict IRAP performance. The Psychological Record, 64, 179–188. doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0020-4.
Nolan, J., Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and body-weight bias: Influence of gender of participants and targets. The Psychological Record, 63, 467–488. doi:10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.005.
O’Brien, K. S., Daníelsdóttir, S., Ólafsson, R. P., Hansdóttir, I., Fridjónsdóttir, T. G., & Jónsdóttir, H. (2013). The relationship between physical appearance concerns, disgust, and anti-fat prejudice. Body Image, 10, 619–623. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.012.
O’Toole, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Three chronometric indices of relational responding as predictors of performance on a brief intelligence test: The importance of relational flexibility. The Psychological Record, 59, 119–132.
Olatunji, B. O., Cisler, J. M., Deacon, B. J., Connolly, K., & Lohr, J. M. (2007). The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale–Revised: Psychometric properties and specificity in relation to anxiety disorder symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 918–930. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.005.
Parling, T., Cernvall, M., Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Ghaderi, A. (2012). Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to compare implicit pro-thin/anti-fat attitudes of patients with anorexia nervosa and non-clinical controls. Eating Disorders, 20, 127–143. doi:10.1080/10640266.2012.654056.
Peterson, C. B., Crosby, R. D., Wonderlich, S. A., Joiner, T., Crow, S. J., Mitchell, J. E., … & le Grange, D. (2007). Psychometric properties of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire: Factor structure and internal consistency. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(4), 386–389. doi:10.1002/eat.20373
Puhl, R., & Brownell, K. D. (2001). Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity Research, 9, 788–805. doi:10.1038/oby.2001.108.
Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17, 941–964. doi:10.1038/oby.208.636.
Ritzert, T. R., Forsyth, J. P., Berghoff, C. R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Nicholson, E. (2015). The impact of a cognitive defusion intervention on behavioral and psychological flexibility: An experimental evaluation in a spider fearful non-clinical sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.04.001.
Roddy, S., Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Anti-fat, pro-thin, or both?: Using two reaction-time based measures to assess implicit attitudes to the thin and overweight. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 416–425. doi:10.1177/1359105309350232.
Roddy, S., Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2011). Facial reactions reveal that slim is good but fat is not bad: Implicit and explicit measures of body-size bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 688–694. doi:10.1002/ejsp.839.
Rushford, N. (2006). Fear of gaining weight: Its validity as a visual analog scale in anorexia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 14, 104–110. doi:10.1002/erv.682.
Schwartz, M. B., Chambliss, H. O. N., Brownell, K. D., Blair, S. N., & Billington, C. (2003). Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obesity Research, 11, 1033–1039. doi:10.1038/oby.2003.142.
Schwartz, M. B., Vartanian, L. R., Nosek, B. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2006). The Influence of one’s own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity, 14, 440–447. doi:10.1038/oby.2006.58.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193.
Thompson, J. K., & Stice, E. (2001). Thin-ideal internalization: Mounting evidence for a new risk factor for body-image disturbance and eating pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 181–183. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00144.
Timko, C. A., England, E. L., Herbert, J. D., & Forman, E. M. (2010). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a measure of self-esteem. The Psychological Record, 60, 679–698.
Tomiyama, A. J., Finch, L. E., Belsky, A. C. I., Buss, J., Finley, C., Schwartz, M. B., & Daubenmier, J. (2015). Weight bias in 2001 versus 2013: Contradictory attitudes among obesity researches and health professionals. Obesity, 23, 46–53. doi:10.1002/oby.20910.
Vahey, N. A., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). A first test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of self-esteem: Irish prisoner groups and university students. The Psychological Record, 59, 371–388.
Vahey, N., Boles, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2010). Measuring adolescents’ smoking-related social identity preferences with the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) for the first time: A starting point that explains later IRAP evolutions. The International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 453–474.
Vahey, N. A., Nicholson, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015). A meta-analysis of criterion effects for the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) in the clinical domain. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.01.004.
van Overveld, M., de Jong, P. J., & Peters, M. L. (2010). The Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale–Revised: Its predictive value for avoidance behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 706–711. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.008.
Woud, M. L., Anschutz, D. J., Van Strien, T., & Becker, E. S. (2011). Measuring thinspiration and fear of fat indirectly: A matter of approach and avoidance. Appetite, 56, 451–455. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.012.
Author Note
We are thankful for Lauren Knauf, who helped with study administration; Jillian Montreuil, who helped with numerous literature searches for this article; and Dermot Barnes-Holmes, for his comments and suggestions related to this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
The authors have no funding to report.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ritzert, T.R., Anderson, L.M., Reilly, E.E. et al. Assessment of Weight/Shape Implicit Bias Related to Attractiveness, Fear, and Disgust. Psychol Rec 66, 405–417 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0181-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0181-4