Skip to main content
Log in

The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Measure of Spider Fear, Avoidance, and Approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study examined the use of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of spider fear, approach, and avoidance. Participants were drawn from a normative sample of university undergraduates. Experiment 1employed two IRAPs, one targeting spider fear, the other targeting spider approach/avoidance. The Fear of Spiders Questionnaire (FSQ) and a Behavioral Approach Task (BAT) using a spider moult were also employed. Negative response biases for spider fear and avoidance, but not for approach, were recorded. The bias for fear was significantly stronger than for avoidance and approach. Both IRAP’s failed to provide evidence for the predicative validity of the IRAP in terms of the BAT. Experiment 2 was a partial replication of Experiment 1 but using a live house spider instead of a moult for the BAT. A similar pattern of results was obtained across the two IRAPs, but one specific trial-type (Spider-Approach) predicted approach responses on the BAT. The research, thus, replicated a previously published study by Nicholson and Barnes-Holmes (2012), thus supporting the predictive validity of the IRAP but at a level of precision not provided in the earlier study. Implications for applied research are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (1997). Why Do People Love Their Pets? Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(4), 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustson, E. M., & Dougher, M. J. (1997). The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28(3), 181–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) Model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62(3), 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A Post Skinnerian Approach to Language and Cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & De Houwer, J. (2011). The dominance of associative theorising in implicit attitude research: Propositional and behavioral alternatives. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 465–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Vahey, N. A. (2012). Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). The moderating impact of distal regularities on the effect of stimulus pairings: A novel perspective on evaluative conditioning. Experimental Psychology. (in press)

  • Hussey, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Implicit Depression and the role of Psychological Inflexibility. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice, 19, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015). From relational frame theory to implicit attitudes and back again: Clarifying the link between RFT and IRAP research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Ruiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Dougher, M. J., Cabello, F., Sanchez, V., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Gutierrez, G. (2013). Extinction of aversive conditioned fear: Does it alter avoidant responding? Journal of Contextual Behavioural Science, 2, 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Ruiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Dougher, M. J., Lopez-Lopez, J. C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Gutierrez-Martinez, G. (2014). Effects of an Acceptance/Diffusion Intervention on Experimentally Induced Generalised Avoidance: A Laboratory demonstration. Journal of The Experimental Analyses of Behaviour, 101, 94–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of spider fear. The Psychological Record, 62, 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, E., Dempsey, K., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). The role of responsibility and threat appraisals in contamination fear and obsessive-compulsive tendencies at the implicit level. Journal of Contextual Behavioural Science, 3(1), 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzert, T. R., Forsyth, J. P., Berghoff, C. R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Nicholson, E. (2015). The impact of a cognitive defusion intervention on behavioral and psychological flexibility: An experimental evaluation in a spider fearful non-clinical sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(2), 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roddy, S., Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2011). Facial reactions reveal that slim is good but fat is not bad: Implicit and explicit measures of body-size bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6), 688–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Forsyth, J. P. (2006). A derived transfer of simple discrimination and self-reported arousal functions in spider fearful and non-spider fearful participants. Journal of the Experimental Analyses of Behaviour, 85(2), 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, J., & O’Donohue, W. (1995). Fear of spiders questionnaire. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26(1), 31–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article was prepared with the support of an Odysseus Group 1 grant awarded to the second author by the Flanders Science Foundation (FWO) and a doctoral research scholarship awarded to the first author. Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to Aileen.Leech@ugent.be

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aileen Leech.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Aileen Leech declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dermot Barnes-Holmes declares that he has no conflict of interest. Lara Madden declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leech, A., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Madden, L. The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Measure of Spider Fear, Avoidance, and Approach. Psychol Rec 66, 337–349 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0176-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0176-1

Keywords

Navigation