Skip to main content
Log in

Was That Bullying? A Mixed-Methods Examination of Layperson Views in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bullying is problematic for school-age children and especially for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). It is commonly defined in research using three themes: intent to harm, repetition, and a power imbalance. Despite encompassing a wide range of behaviors, these themes may not fully align with day-to-day layperson experiences. They also may not account for the cognitive biases within respondent groups that impact bullying perception. This study used a mixed-methods approach to understand how laypersons determine the presence and type of bullying behavior. The impact of an ASD relationship (i.e., ASD parents and teachers) on perceptions of bullying was also examined. Participants (N = 184 adults) categorized brief, written vignettes describing child dyadic interactions as a type of bullying behavior (i.e., physical, verbal, interpersonal, cyber), non-bullying behavior, or provided an “other” response. Thematic analysis of the qualitative, “other” explanations for bullying ambiguity revealed three themes: a need for more contextual information, the presence of other types of bullying (outside the options provided), and other non-bullying behaviors (e.g., crime, peer pressure). Comparing the probability of use across and within themes revealed statistically significant differences such that layperson views of bullying did not fully align with research definitions. Additionally, perceptions of bullying differed among individuals with and without ASD relationships (i.e., parents, teachers) and undergraduate students. Existing research definitions for bullying do not fully encompass the breadth of daily-lived and cultural experiences of laypersons. We propose an expanded “working definition” of bullying that may be useful to more accurately identify children in need of intervention and generate more reliable estimates of bullying across studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Eleanor Amy Gunasingh in the thematic analysis coding of qualitative responses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah E. Morton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Binghamton University Institutional Review Board (IRB#3844-16) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants includes in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morton, H.E., Bottini, S.B., Pugliesi, D. et al. Was That Bullying? A Mixed-Methods Examination of Layperson Views in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Contemp School Psychol 25, 476–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00265-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00265-w

Keywords

Navigation