Abstract
Video self-modeling (VSM) is an evidence-based intervention for teaching new behaviors that is effective, engaging, and incorporates digital technology. While its utility has been well explored to develop new communication and/or social skills for students with disabilities, fewer studies have examined its use for reading fluency with diverse learners, including those with severe reading deficits, older students, and dual language learners (DLL). The implications of poorly developed reading fluency are serious, and unfortunately, impact many students in today’s schools. Educators must find ways to actively engage students in fluency interventions that are evidence-based, build on their strengths, yet are also feasible to implement. The current study employs a multiple baseline design to evaluate the impact of VSM on oral reading fluency, reading errors, and reading self-concept with three seventh-grade DLL students with special needs. Results showed increases in the average number of correct words per minute on familiar passages, and a consistent reduction in errors across participants on familiar and unfamiliar passages. The average effect size (percent of non-overlapping data) across all participants was .78, suggesting that VSM may be an effective intervention for older learners, as well as for DLLs with disabilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aganza, J., Godinez, A., Smith, D., Gonzalez, L., & Robinson-Zañartu, C. (2015). Using cultural assets to enhance assessment of Latino students. Contemporary School Psychology (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.), 19(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0041-7.
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2014). Early Reading Proficiency in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/~/media/Pubs/Initiatives/KIDS%20COUNT/E/EarlyReadingProficiency/EarlyReadingProficiency2014.pdf
Ayala, S. M., & O'Connor, R. (2013). The effects of video self-modeling on the decoding skills of children at risk for reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(3), 142–154.
Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Francis, D. (2014). The effects of student and text characteristics on the oral reading fluency of middle-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 162–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033826.
Bellini, S., Akullian, J., & Hopf, A. (2007). Increasing social engagement in young children with autism spectrum disorders using video self-modeling. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 80.
Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009). Increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency with small-group interventions: a comparison of repeated reading, listening passage preview, and listening only strategies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 211–228.
Begeny, J. C., & Silber, J. M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 183–195.
Boisvert, P., & Rao, K. (2015). Video self-modeling for English language learners. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 36–58.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (n.d.). English Language Arts Standards » Introduction »Key Design Consideration. Retrieved May 23, 2018, from http://www.corestandards.org/ELALiteracy/introduction/key-design-consideration/
Denton, C. A., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Bryan, D. (2008). Intervention provided to linguistically diverse middle school students with severe reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23(2), 79–89.
Dowrick, P. W. (1999). A review of self modeling and related interventions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8(1), 23–39.
Dowrick, P. W. (2011). Self modeling: expanding the theories of learning. Psychology in the Schools, 49(1), 30–41.
Dowrick, P. W., Kim-Rupnow, W. S., & Power, T. J. (2006). Video feedforward for reading. Journal of Special Education, 39, 194–207.
Franzone, E., & Collet-Klingenberg, L. (2008). Overview of video modeling. Madison, WI: The National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256.
Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M., & Mazzoni, S. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49, 518–533.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
Greenberg, D., Buggey, T., & Bond, C. L. (2002). Video self-modeling as a tool for improving oral reading fluency and self-confidence. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED471 091.
Hitchcock, C. H., Dowrick, P. W., & Prater, M. A. (2003). Video self-modeling intervention in school-based settings: a review. Remedial and Special Education, 24(1), 36–45 56.
Hitchcock, C. H., Prater, M. A., & Dowrick, P. W. (2004). Reading comprehension and fluency: examining the effects of tutoring and video self-modeling on first-grade students with reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 89–103.
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
Kim, Y.-S., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2012). Developmental relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension: a longitudinal study from grade 1 to grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 93–111.
Klubnik, C., & Ardoin, S. P. (2010). Examining immediate and maintenance effects of a reading intervention package on generalization materials: individual verses group implementation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19(1), 7–29.
Kupzyk, S., McCurdy, M., Hofstadter, K. L., & Berger, L. (2011). Recorded readings: a taped parent-tutoring intervention. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 87–102.
Lesaux, N. K., & Harris, J. R. (2013). Linguistically diverse students’ reading difficulties. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 69–84). New York: The Guilford Press.
Montgomerie, R., Little, S. G., & Akin-Little, A. (2014). Video self-modeling as an intervention for oral reading fluency. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 18.
Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R. O., & Barkley, E. A. (2009). Effects of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth-grade students: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(1), 12–23.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. Retrieved from https://www.nasponline.org/Documents/Standards%20and%20Certification/Standards/2_PracticeModel.pdf.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). 2015 Mathematics and reading assessments. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#reading?grade=8
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The Nation’s Report Card: mega-states: an analysis of student performance in the five most heavily populated states in the nation. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2013450.pdf
National Reading Panel. (2000). Fluency. In National Reading Panel (Ed.), Teaching children to read (chapter 3). Washington: National Institute of Child Health and Human.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics: kindergarten introduction. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/K/introductionDevelopment.
Ortiz, J., Burlingame, C., Onuegbulem, C., Yoshikawa, K., & Rojas, E. D. (2012). The use of video self-modeling with English language learners: implications for success. Psychology in the Schools, 49(1), 23–29.
Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. (2007). Percentage of all non-overlapping data (PAND) an alternative to PND. The Journal of Special Education, 40(4), 194–204.
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510–519.
Pitcher, S. M., Albright, L. K., DeLaney, C. J., Walker, N. T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., et al. (2007). Assessing adolescents’ motivation to read. International Reading Association, 50(5), 378–396.
Prater, M. A., Carter, N., Hitchcock, C., & Dowrick, P. W. (2012). Video self-modeling to improve academic performance: a literature review. Psychology in the Schools, 49(1), 71–81.
Quirk, M., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Webb, M. Y. (2009). A short-term longitudinal study of the relationship between motivation to read and reading fluency skill in second grade. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(2), 196–227.
Raskinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: more that automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350–361.
Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2013). Reading achievement and reading self-concept—testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21–30.
Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Burns, M. K. (2009). Evaluating educational interventions: single-case design for measuring response to intervention. New York: The Guilford Press.
Robson, C., Blampied, N., & Walker, L. (2015). Effects of feedforward video self-modelling on reading fluency and comprehension. Behaviour Change, 32(01), 46–58.
Robinson-Zañartu, C., Draper Rodríguez, C. & Olvera, P. (2018). The provision of school psychological services to dual language learners. Contemporary School Psychology (in press).
Sáenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 231–247.
Swain, K. D., Leader-Janssen, E. M., & Conley, P. (2013). Effects of repeated reading and listening passage preview on oral reading fluency. Reading Improvement, 50(1), 12–18.
Smith, J., Hand, L., & Dowrick, P. W. (2014). Video feedforward for rapid learning of a picture-based communication system. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(4), 926–936.
Silber, J. M., & Martens, B. K. (2010). Programming for the generalization of oral reading fluency: repeated readings of entire text versus multiple exemplars. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 30–46.
University of Oregon DIBELS Data System. (2013). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS). Retrieved from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/market/assessment/dibels
Wu, S., & Gadke, D. L. (2017). Improving oral reading fluency in elementary school children: Comparing the effectiveness of repeated reading and video self-modeling. School Psychology Forum, 11(3), 91–104.
Funding
There was no funding involved in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edwards, N.M., Lambros, K.M. Video Self-modeling as a Reading Fluency Intervention for Dual Language Learners with Disabilities. Contemp School Psychol 22, 468–478 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0207-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0207-9