Abstract
Level systems have been described as a framework which can be used to shape behavior through the systematic application of behavioral principles. Within level systems, an individual moves up and down through various levels contingent upon specific behaviors. Although level systems are commonly used within schools and other settings, they have a limited empirical literature base, and there is debate over the efficacy and overall acceptance of level systems. More especially, there is scant empirical literature on the use level systems to improve socially significant behaviors (e.g., synchronous engagement) with individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a level system with a structured, yet flexible approach to movement on improving synchronous engagement with two dyads of children diagnosed with ASD. The results of an ABAB reversal design indicated that the level system was effective at improving synchronous engagement for both dyads. The results are discussed in relation to potential future research difficulties and clinical implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.
Bauer, A. M., Shea, T. M., & Keppler, R. (1986). Levels systems: a framework for the individualization of behavior management. Behavioral Disorders, 12(1), 28–35.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Contingency contracting, token economy, and group contingencies. In Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.pp. 550–574). Upper Saddle: Pearson.
Farrell, D. T., Smith, S. W., & Brownell, M. T. (1998). Teacher perceptions of level system effectiveness on the behavior of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 89–98.
Gonzalez, M. L., Taylor, T., Borrero, C. S. W., & Sangkavasi, E. (2013). An individualized levels system to increase independent mealtime behavior in children with food refusal. Behavioral Interventions, 28(2), 143–157.
Hagopian, L. P., Rush, K. S., Richman, D. M., Kurtz, P. F., Contrucci, S. A., & Crosland, K. (2002). The development and application of individualized levels systems for the treatment of severe problem behavior. Behavior Therapy, 33(1), 65–86.
Kazdin, A. E., & Bootzin, R. R. (1972). The token economy: an evaluative review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(3), 343–372.
Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., Leaf, J. A., Alcalay, A., Ravid, D., Dale, S., … & Oppenheim-Leaf, M. (2016a). Comparing paired-stimulus preference assessments with in-the-moment reinforcer analysis on skill acquisition: a preliminary investigation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 1–11.
Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., Taubman, M., Ala’i-Rosales, S., Ross, R. K., … & Weiss, M. J. (2016b). Applied behavior analysis is a science and, therefore, progressive. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 720–731.
Leaf, J. B., Leaf, J. A., Milne, C., Taubman, M., Oppenheim-Leaf, M., Torres, N., … & Yoder, P. (2017). An evaluation of a behaviorally based social skills group for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(2), 243–259.
Leaf, J. B., Leaf, R., Taubman, M., McEachin, J., & Delmolino, L. (2014). Comparison of flexible prompt fading to error correction for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(2), 203–224.
Mohr, W. K., Martin, A., Olson, J. N., Pumariega, A. J., & Branca, N. (2009). Beyond point and level systems: moving toward child-centered programming. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 79(1), 8–18.
Powell, J., Martindale, A., & Kulp, S. (1975). An evaluation of time-sample measures of behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(4), 463–469.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
Smith, S. W., & Farrell, D. T. (1993). Level system use in special education: classroom intervention with prima facie appeal. Behavioral Disorders, 18(4), 251–264.
Vernon, T. W., Koegel, R. L., Dauterman, H., & Stolen, K. (2012). An early engagement intervention for young children with autism and their parents. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(12), 2702–2717.
Weinkauf, S., Zeug, N., Anderson, C., & Ala’i-Rosales, S. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive staff training package for behavioral interventions for children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 864–871.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cihon, J.H., Ferguson, J.L., Leaf, J.B. et al. Use of a Level System with Flexible Shaping to Improve Synchronous Engagement. Behav Analysis Practice 12, 44–51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0254-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0254-8