Skip to main content
Log in

Developing Procedures to Improve Therapist–Child Rapport in Early Intervention

  • Brief Practice
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapport is a primary component in the development of a therapeutic relationship between health-service professionals and clients. Presession pairing is a procedure often recommended in behavior analytic practice to build rapport with clients. However, many service providers may not exhibit presession pairing skills correctly or at a sufficient rate. The current study aimed to operationally define therapist behaviors that are indicative of presession pairing and to train direct care staff to implement said skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carbone, V. J., Morgenstern, B., Zecchin-Tirri, G., & Kolberg, L. (2007). The role of the reflexive conditioned motivating operation (CMO-R) during discrete trial instruction of children with autism. Journal of Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention, 4, 658–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982)

  • Kelly, A. N., Axe, J. B., Allen, R. F., & Maguire, R. W. (2015). Effect of presession pairing on the challenging behavior and academic responding of children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 30, 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, D. M., & Carr, E. G. (2005). Quality of rapport as a setting event for problem behavior: assessment and intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 68–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: national standards project, phase 2. Randolph, MA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinke, W. M., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Martin, E. (2007). The effect of visual performance feedback on teacher use of behavior-specific praise. Behavior Modification, 31, 247–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, D., & McMahon, R. J. (2013). Constance “Connie” Hanf (1917–2002): the mentor and the model. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 20, 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarakoff, R., & Sturmey, P. (2008). The effects of instructions, rehearsal, modeling, and feedback on acquisition and generalization of staff use of discrete trial teaching and student correct responses. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., & Shapiro, S. K. (2014). Increasing social approach and decreasing social avoidance in children with autism spectrum disorder during discrete trial training. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1443–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2001). Discrete trial training in the treatment of autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program: a language and social skills assessment program for children with autism or other developmental disabilities: guide. Concord, CA: AVB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: an extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Psychiatry, 12, 257–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley M. Lugo.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Implications for Practice

• Behavior analytic resources referencing rapport building as a treatment component have little empirical support.

• Literature on rapport building and a rationale for its use in early intervention are reviewed.

• Technological descriptions of presession pairing skills and methods to measure presession pairing are introduced as a resource for practitioners in early intervention.

• Behavioral skills training and performance feedback are effective methods to teach staff presession pairing skills.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lugo, A.M., King, M.L., Lamphere, J.C. et al. Developing Procedures to Improve Therapist–Child Rapport in Early Intervention. Behav Analysis Practice 10, 395–401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0165-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0165-5

Keywords

Navigation