Skip to main content
Log in

An Evaluation of a Brief Video-Based Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment

  • BAP Brief Practices
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated a brief multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessment conducted in video format with four children with autism. Specifically, we compared the results of a video-based MSWO to the results of a tangible MSWO. Toys identified as highly preferred (HP) in the video-based MSWO were also HP in the tangible MSWO for three of four participants, and correlations between video-based and tangible MSWO assessment results across participants were strong and statistically significant. Therefore, video-based MSWOs may be an accurate compliment to tangible MSWOs for children with autism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353–357. doi:10.1891/jaba.2000.33-353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger, T. M., & Graff, R. B. (2005). Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 543–547. doi:10.1901/jaba.2005/161-04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kagohara, D., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, T., Davis, T., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Marschik, P., Sutherland, D., Green, V., & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Falcomata, T. S., Sigafoos, J., & Xu, Z. (2013). Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: a review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1125–1133. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, A. M., Carr, J. E., & Lepper, T. L. (2011). Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Modification, 35, 347–369. doi:10.1177/0145445511405184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. N. (2014). The effectiveness of a video-based preference assessment in identifying socially reinforcing stimuli (Masters thesis). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2296.

  • Snyder, K., Higbee, T. S., & Dayton, E. (2012). Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 413–418. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: the VB-MAPP. Concord: AVB Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew T. Brodhead.

Additional information

Implications for Practitioners

1. Visual discrimination, picture-to-object, and object-to-picture matching skills may be important pre-requisite skills for video-based MSWOs

2. Develop videos that capture the critical features of each toy while minimizing visual and auditory distractions

3. Routinely conduct video-based MSWOs to account for momentary changes in preference

4. Periodically conduct tangible MSWOs to determine if results are similar to video-based MSWOs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brodhead, M.T., Al-Dubayan, M.N., Mates, M. et al. An Evaluation of a Brief Video-Based Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment. Behav Analysis Practice 9, 160–164 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0

Keywords

Navigation