Abstract
We evaluated a brief multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessment conducted in video format with four children with autism. Specifically, we compared the results of a video-based MSWO to the results of a tangible MSWO. Toys identified as highly preferred (HP) in the video-based MSWO were also HP in the tangible MSWO for three of four participants, and correlations between video-based and tangible MSWO assessment results across participants were strong and statistically significant. Therefore, video-based MSWOs may be an accurate compliment to tangible MSWOs for children with autism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353–357. doi:10.1891/jaba.2000.33-353.
Clevenger, T. M., & Graff, R. B. (2005). Assessing object-to-picture and picture-to-object matching as prerequisite skills for pictorial preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 543–547. doi:10.1901/jaba.2005/161-04.
DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Kagohara, D., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, T., Davis, T., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Marschik, P., Sutherland, D., Green, V., & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
Kang, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Falcomata, T. S., Sigafoos, J., & Xu, Z. (2013). Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: a review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1125–1133. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.021.
Karsten, A. M., Carr, J. E., & Lepper, T. L. (2011). Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Modification, 35, 347–369. doi:10.1177/0145445511405184.
Peterson, R. N. (2014). The effectiveness of a video-based preference assessment in identifying socially reinforcing stimuli (Masters thesis). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2296.
Snyder, K., Higbee, T. S., & Dayton, E. (2012). Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 413–418. doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413.
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: the VB-MAPP. Concord: AVB Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Implications for Practitioners
1. Visual discrimination, picture-to-object, and object-to-picture matching skills may be important pre-requisite skills for video-based MSWOs
2. Develop videos that capture the critical features of each toy while minimizing visual and auditory distractions
3. Routinely conduct video-based MSWOs to account for momentary changes in preference
4. Periodically conduct tangible MSWOs to determine if results are similar to video-based MSWOs
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brodhead, M.T., Al-Dubayan, M.N., Mates, M. et al. An Evaluation of a Brief Video-Based Multiple-Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment. Behav Analysis Practice 9, 160–164 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0