Skip to main content
Log in

The Evidence-Based Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a model of professional decision-making in which practitioners integrate the best available evidence with client values/context and clinical expertise in order to provide services for their clients. This framework provides behavior analysts with a structure for pervasive use of the best available evidence in the complex settings in which they work. This structure recognizes the need for clear and explicit understanding of the strength of evidence supporting intervention options, the important contextual factors including client values that contribute to decision making, and the key role of clinical expertise in the conceptualization, intervention, and evaluation of cases. Opening the discussion of EBP in this journal, Smith (The Behavior Analyst, 36, 7–33, 2013) raised several key issues related to EBP and applied behavior analysis (ABA). The purpose of this paper is to respond to Smith’s arguments and extend the discussion of the relevant issues. Although we support many of Smith’s (The Behavior Analyst, 36, 7–33, 2013) points, we contend that Smith’s definition of EBP is significantly narrower than definitions that are used in professions with long histories of EBP and that this narrowness conflicts with the principles that drive applied behavior analytic practice. We offer a definition and framework for EBP that aligns with the foundations of ABA and is consistent with well-established definitions of EBP in medicine, psychology, and other professions. In addition to supporting the systematic use of research evidence in behavior analytic decision making, this definition can promote clear communication about treatment decisions across disciplines and with important outside institutions such as insurance companies and granting agencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albin, R. W., Lucyshyn, J. M., Horner, R. H., & Flannery, K. B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavior support plans. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behaviors in the community (pp. 81–92). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Occupational Therapy Association. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process (2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 625–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (2005). Policy statement on evidence-based practice in psychology. http://www.apa.org/practice/resources/evidence/evidence-based-statement.pdf.

  • American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force of Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2005). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [position statement]. www.asha.org/policy.

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 313–327.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behavior Analyst Certification Board (2010). Guidelines for responsible conduct for behavior analysts. http://www.bacb.com/index.php?page=57.

  • Benazzi, L., Horner, R. H., & Good, R. H. (2006). Effects of behavior support team composition on the technical adequacy and contextual-fit of behavior support plans. The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogduk, N., & Fraifeld, E. M. (2010). Proof or consequences: who shall pay for the evidence in pain medicine? Pain Medicine, 11(1), 1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bushell, D., Jr., & Baer, D. M. (1994). Measurably superior instruction means close, continual contact with the relevant outcome data. Revolutionary! In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 3–10). Pacific Grove: Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnine, D. (1992). Expanding the notion of teachers’ rights: access to tools that work. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(1), 13–19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. E., Severtson, J. M., & Lepper, T. L. (2009). Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 44–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chorpita, B. F. (2003). The frontier of evidence-based practice. In A. E. Kazdin & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 42–59). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2005). Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: a distillation and matching model. Mental Health Services Research, 7, 5–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chorpita, B. F., Becker, K. D., & Daleiden, E. L. (2007). Understanding the common elements of evidence-based practice: misconceptions and clinical examples. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 647–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. G., & Cook, S. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrich, R. (Chair) (2009). Evidence-based, empirically supported, best practice: What does it all mean? Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, Phoenix, AZ.

  • Detrich, R., Slocum, T. A., & Spencer, T. D. (2013). Evidence-based education and best available evidence: Decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. In B. G. Cook, M. Tankersley, & T. J. Landrum (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities, 26 (pp. 21–44). Bingly, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embry, D. D. (2004). Community-based prevention using simple, low-cost, evidence-based kernels and behavior vaccines. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 575–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embry, D. D., & Biglan, A. (2008). Evidence-based kernels: fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 75–113.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., & Roane, H. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of applied behavior analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI publication #231). Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodheart, C. D. (2006). Evidence, endeavor, and expertise in psychology practice. In C. D. Goodheart, A. E. Kazdin, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapy: Where practice and research meet (pp. 37–61). Washington, D.C.: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. W. (2003). Ethics and evidence-based education: Fallibility and responsibility in clinical science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, W. L., et al. (Eds.). (2005). Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005a). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Todd, A. W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005b). Schoolwide positive behavior support. In L. M. Bambera & L. Kern (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359–390). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 70, Fed. Reg., (2005).

  • Institute of Education Sciences, US. Department of Education. (n.d.). What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (No. Version 3.0). Washington DC. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf.

  • Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. J., & Azrin, N. H. (1969). Behavioral engineering: stuttering as a function of stimulus duration during speech synchronization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 223–229.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2000). Psychotherapy for children and adolescents: Directions for research and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.

  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., et al. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial & Special Education, 34(1), 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, G. J., Dube, W. V., Hackenberg, T. D., Hanley, G. P., & Lattal, K. A. (Eds.). (2013). American Psychological Association handbook of behavior analysis (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13938-006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggin, D. M., O’Keeffe, B. V., & Johnson, A. H. (2011). A quantitative synthesis of single-subject meta-analyses in special education, 1985–2009. Exceptionality, 19, 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggin, D. M., Johnson, A. H., Chafouleas, S. M., Ruberto, L. M., & Berggren, M. (2012). A systematic evidence review of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 625–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, K., Filter, K. J., Bennett, J. L., Ryan, C., & Sugai, G. (2010). Principles of sustainable prevention: designing scale–up of School–wide Positive Behavior Support to promote durable systems. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Autism Center. (2009). National Standards Project: Findings and conclusions. Randolph: National Autism Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110. (2002).

  • Polsgrove, L. (2003). Reflections on the past and future. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 337–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2003). Using interventions that exist in the natural environment to increase treatment integrity and social influence in consultation. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 14(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (Eds.). (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to teach and practice EBM. Edinburgh: Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N.K., Pearson, P.D., Schatschneider, C., et al. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide (NCEE 2010-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides. Accessed 12 Sept 2013

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, T. A., & Wilczynski, S. (2008). The unit of analysis in evidence-based practice. Invited paper presented at the meeting the Association for Behavior Analysis International, Chicago, Il.

  • Slocum, T. A., Detrich, R., & Spencer, T. D. (2012a). Evaluating the validity of systematic reviews to identify empirically supported treatments. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, T. A., Spencer, T. D., & Detrich, R. (2012b). Best available evidence: three complementary approaches. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, R. H. (2004). Maximize the likelihood of reimbursement when appealing managed care medical necessity denials. Getting Paid in Behavioral Healthcare, 9(12), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (2013). What is evidence-based behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 36, 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strain, P. S., Barton, E. E., & Dunap, G. (2012). Lessons learned about the utility of social validity. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski, S. M. (2012). Risk and strategic decision-making in developing evidence-based practice guidelines. Education and Treatment of Children, 35, 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1978). Social validity: the case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zients, J. D. (2012). M-12-14. Memorandum to the heads of executive departs. From: Jeffrey D. Zients, Acting Director. Subject: use of evidence and evaluation in the 2014 Budget. www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/…/2012/m-12-14.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy A. Slocum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slocum, T.A., Detrich, R., Wilczynski, S.M. et al. The Evidence-Based Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 37, 41–56 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-014-0005-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-014-0005-2

Keywords

Navigation