Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social Media: Portrait of an Emerging Tool in Medical Education

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The authors compare the prevalence of challenges and opportunities in commentaries and descriptive accounts versus evaluative studies of social media use in medical education.

Methods

A previously published report of social media use in medical education provided an in-depth discussion of 14 evaluative studies, a small subset of the total number of 99 articles on this topic. This study used the full set of articles identified by that review, including the 58 commentaries and 27 descriptive accounts which had not been previously reported, to provide a glimpse into how emerging tools in medical education are initially perceived. Each commentary, descriptive account, and evaluative study was identified and compared on various characteristics, including discussion themes regarding the challenges and opportunities of social media use in medical education.

Results

Themes related to the challenges of social media use in medical education were more prevalent in commentaries and descriptive accounts than in evaluative studies. The potential of social media to affect medical professionalism adversely was the most commonly discussed challenge in the commentaries (53 %) and descriptive accounts (63 %) in comparison to technical issues related to implementation in the evaluative studies (50 %).

Conclusions

Results suggest that the early body of literature on social media use in medical education—like that of previous innovative education tools—comprises primarily commentaries and descriptive accounts that focus more on the challenges of social media than on potential opportunities. These results place social media tools in historical context and lay the groundwork for expanding on this novel approach to medical education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brynhildsen J, Dahle LO, Behrbohm Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Attitudes among students and teachers on vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum. Med Teach. 2002;24(3):286–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khoo HE, Chhem RK, Gwee MC, Balasubramaniam P. Introduction of problem-based learning in a traditional medical curriculum in Singapore—students' and tutors' perspectives. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2001;30(4):371–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yaqinuddin A. Problem-based learning as an instructional method. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013;23(1):83–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartling L, Spooner C, Tjosvold L, Oswald A. Problem-based learning in pre-clinical medical education: 22 years of outcome research. Med Teach. 2010;32(1):28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawson S. Perspectives on performance assessment in medical simulation. Surgeon. 2011;9 Suppl 1:S21–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hagen SS, Ferguson KJ, Sharp WJ, Adam LA. Residents' attitudes about the introduction of a surgical skills simulation laboratory. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(1):28–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Griswold S, Ponnuru S, Nishisaki A, Szyld D, Davenport M, Deutsch ES, et al. The emerging role of simulation education to achieve patient safety: translating deliberate practice and debriefing to save lives. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012;59(6):1329–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kern D, Thomas P, Howard D, Bass E, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greysen SR, Chretien KC, Kind T, Young A, Gross CP. Physician violations of online professionalism and disciplinary actions: a national survey of state medical boards. JAMA. 2012;307(11):1141–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kind T, Patel PD, Lie D, Chretien KC. Twelve tips for using social media as a medical educator. Med Teach. 2014;36(4):284–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farnan J, Paro JA, Higa J, Edelson J, Arora VM. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(4):517–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greysen SR, Kind T, Chretien KC. Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1227–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):893–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cartledge P, Miller M, Phillips B. The use of social-networking sites in medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):847–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gholami-Kordkheili F, Wild V, Strech D. The impact of social media on medical professionalism: a systematic qualitative review of challenges and opportunities. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e184.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chretien KC, Kind T. Social media and clinical care: ethical, professional, and social implications. Circulation. 2013;127(13):1413–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Durga Roy, Jacob Taylor & Margaret S. Chisolm

  2. Harvard Medical School and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

    Christine C. Cheston

  3. University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Tabor E. Flickinger

Authors
  1. Durga Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine C. Cheston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tabor E. Flickinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Margaret S. Chisolm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret S. Chisolm.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, D., Taylor, J., Cheston, C.C. et al. Social Media: Portrait of an Emerging Tool in Medical Education. Acad Psychiatry 40, 136–140 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0278-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0278-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation