Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual healthy aging indices, measurements and scores

  • Review
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The positive gerontological approach to aging has resulted in successive terminologies to describe the process of aging, including successful aging, active aging, healthy aging, or healthy and active aging, amongst others. Each definition proposed by geriatricians, psychologists, sociologists or public health specialists has been based on specific aspects of aging that are most important to the authors’ discipline, explaining the current difficulty in determining which is the best set of criteria to determine “good aging”. Two successive analyses of the measurements used in longitudinal studies from 1989 to 2018 testify to this heterogeneity in the types of questions proposed to evaluate the quality of the individual aging process. To confront this complexity, new and integrated indices have successively been proposed to quantify and qualify the survival period of aging individuals. The present paper aims to describe and compare the value of the “healthy aging index”, the “modified healthy aging index”, the “healthy aging score” and the “selfie aging test”. Attempts to date to identify the best individual measurement of “aging well” have been interesting, and certainly show promise, but their limitations to specific populations call for more concerted effort from the scientific community to obtain worldwide validation. Another option would be to identify the best self-assessment questionnaire and include it in a mobile device, enabling longer term personal follow-up of aging functions. There is a clear lack of data of this type at present, and an urgent need to obtain such information, to enable early and targeted interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michel JP, Sadana R (2017) “Healthy aging” concepts and measures. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:460–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Erikson EH (1950) Childhood and society. WW Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cumming E, Henry WE (1961) Growing old, the process of disengagement. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Havighurst RJ (1961) Successful aging. Gerontol 1:8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Havighurst RJ (1963) Successful aging. In: Williams RH, Tibbits C, Donahue W (eds) Processes of aging. Atherton, New York, pp 299–320

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW et al (1963) Studies of illness in the aged. The index of Adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 185:914–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neugarten BL (1972) Personality and the aging process. Gerontologist 12:9–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1987) Human aging: usual and successful. Science (New York) 237:143–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1998) Successful aging. Aging (Milan, Italy) 10:142–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baltes PB, Baltes MM (1990) Successful aging: perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Butler RM, Oberlink MR, Schechter M (1990) Promise of productive aging: from biology to social policy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization (2002) Active ageing: a policy framework. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerontological Society of America (2005) Civic Engagement in an Older America. http://www.civicengagement.org/agingsociety/Pages%20from%20Geron-NLSept05.pdf. Accessed 02 Apr 2019

  14. Martinson M, Minkler M (2006) Civic engagement and older adults: a critical perspective. Gerontologist 46:318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tornstam L (2005) Gerotranscendence: a developmental theory of positive aging. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Swedish National Institute of Public Health (2006) Healthy Ageing. A challenge for Europe, Sweden, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fry CL, Dickerson-Putman J, Draper P et al (2008) Culture and the meaning of a good old age. In: Sokolovsky J (ed) The cultural context of aging: worldwide perspectives. Praeger, Westport, p 808

    Google Scholar 

  18. Young Y, Frick KD, Phelan EA (2009) Can successful aging and chronic illness coexist in the same individual? a multidimensional concept of successful aging. J Am Med Dir Assoc 10:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeste DV, Depp CA, Vahia IV (2010) Successful cognitive and emotional aging. World Psychiatry 9:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. European Commission (2011) How to promote active ageing in Europe. EU support to local and regional actors. Brussels: AGE Platform Europe in partnership with the Committee of the Regions and the European Commission. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6d80a85f-43d5-4462-b5bf-8dd8aaffffb5. Accessed 4 Apr 2019

  21. Hicks MM, Conner NE (2014) Resilient ageing: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 70:744–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization (2015) World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 260

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rantanen KK, Strandberg TE, Stenholm SS et al (2015) Clinical and laboratory characteristics of active and healthy aging (AHA) in octogenarian men. Aging Clin Exp Res 27:581–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kusumastuti S, Derks MG, Tellier S et al (2016) Successful ageing: a study of the literature using citation network analysis. Maturitas 93:4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Depp CA, Jeste DV (2006) Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14:6–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu W, Pikhart H, Sacker A (2018) Domains and measurements of healthy aging in epidemiological studies: a review. Gerontologist 59:e294–e310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Newman AB, Boudreau RM, Naydeck BL et al (2008) A Physiologic Index of Comorbidity: relationship to mortality and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanders JL, Minster RL, Barmada MM et al (2014) Heritability of and mortality prediction with a longevity phenotype: the healthy aging index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:479–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu C, Smit E, Sanders JL et al (2017) A modified healthy aging index and its association with mortality: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2002. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 72:1437–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanders JL, Fitzpatrick AL, Boudreau RM et al (2012) Leukocyte telomere length is associated with noninvasively measured age-related disease: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McCabe EL, Larson MG, Lunetta KL et al (2016) Association of an index of healthy aging with incident cardiovascular disease and mortality in a community-based sample of older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 71:1695–1701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jaspers L, Schoufour JD, Erler NS et al (2017) Development of a healthy aging score in the population-based Rotterdam study: evaluating age and sex differences. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:e1–e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goncalves J, Gomes MI, Fonseca M et al (2017) Selfie Aging Index: an index for the self-assessment of healthy and active aging. Front Med (Lausanne) 4:236

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Jean-Pierre Michel

  2. Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University Hospitals Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Christophe Graf

  3. EA3920, University of Franche-Comté, Besancon, France

    Fiona Ecarnot

  4. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, 3 Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besancon, France

    Fiona Ecarnot

Authors
  1. Jean-Pierre Michel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christophe Graf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fiona Ecarnot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Ecarnot.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No author has any conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michel, JP., Graf, C. & Ecarnot, F. Individual healthy aging indices, measurements and scores. Aging Clin Exp Res 31, 1719–1725 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01327-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01327-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation