Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Developing Psychiatric Biomarkers: a Review Focusing on the Error-Related Negativity as a Biomarker for Anxiety

  • Mood Disorders (S Frangou, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Efforts to identify psychiatric biomarkers that confer clinical utility have not yet been as successful as other areas of medicine. The current review evaluates one promising psychiatric biomarker (the error-related negativity (ERN)—a neural index of error processing) in an attempt to outline a roadmap for the development of future biological markers of risk for psychopathology. Integrating suggestions from the Biomarkers Definition Working Group into a framework of psychopathology, with an emphasis on a developmental perspective, we demonstrate that the ERN relates to diagnoses and dimensional anxiety symptoms concurrently—and can predict new onset disorders prospectively. The ERN appears related to a clinically relevant transdiagnostic phenotype (i.e., the tendency to engage in checking behaviors)—and also differentiates anxiety from highly comorbid conditions such as depression. We emphasize the importance of evaluating the psychometric properties of psychiatric biomarkers, in adults and children, pointing out that the ERN displays excellent internal and test-retest reliability across development. Furthermore, we discuss the diagnostic utility of the ERN as well as animal models of error processing that may pave the way for the development of pharmacological interventions. Finally, we raise the possibility that a psychiatric biomarker can serve as a target of treatment, thereby encouraging the development of novel intervention strategies. In the case of the ERN, we discuss the use of attentional training, parenting interventions, and neurostimulation as potential avenues of intervention to alleviate or prevent the onset of anxiety disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. James CR, Quinn JE, Mullan PB, Johnston PG, Harkin DP. BRCA1, a potential predictive biomarker in the treatment of breast cancer. Oncologist. 2007;12(2):142–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colburn W, DeGruttola VG, DeMets DL, Downing GJ, Hoth DF, Oates JA, et al. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clementz BA, Sweeney JA, Hamm JP, Ivleva EI, Ethridge LE, Pearlson GD, et al. Identification of distinct psychosis biotypes using brain-based biomarkers. Am J Psychiatry. 2015. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14091200.

  4. Loo SK, Lenartowicz A, Makeig S. Research review: use of EEG biomarkers in child psychiatry research—current state and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(1):4–17. This article reviews the use of EEG to identify biomarkers early in development. It provides a methodological overview, as well a discussion of current controversies in this area.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beauchaine TP. Role of biomarkers and endophenotypes in prevention and treatment of psychopathological disorders. 2009.

  6. Razafsha M, Khaku A, Azari H, Alawieh A, Behforuzi H, Fadlallah B, et al. Biomarker identification in psychiatric disorders: from neuroscience to clinical practice. J Psychiatr Pract. 2015;21(1):37–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenzenweger MF. Thinking clearly about the endophenotype–intermediate phenotype–biomarker distinctions in developmental psychopathology research. Dev Psychopathol. 2013;25(4pt2):1347–57. This article lays out distinctions between endophenotypes and biomarkers in the context of developmental research.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luck SJ. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2014.

  9. Shackman AJ, Salomons TV, Slagter HA, Fox AS, Winter JJ, Davidson RJ. The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(3):154–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gehring WJ, Himle J, Nisenson LG. Action-monitoring dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychol Sci. 2000;11(1):1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moser JS, Moran TP, Schroder HS, Donnellan MB, Yeung N. On the relationship between anxiety and error monitoring: a meta-analysis and conceptual framework. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinberg A, Kotov R, Proudfit GH. Neural indicators of error processing in generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015;124(1):172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinberg A, Olvet DM, Hajcak G. Increased error-related brain activity in generalized anxiety disorder. Biol Psychol. 2010;85(3):472–80. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.09.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Endrass T, Riesel A, Kathmann N, Buhlmann U. Performance monitoring in obsessive–compulsive disorder and social anxiety disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123(4):705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer A, Hajcak G, Torpey DC, Kujawa A, Kim J, Bufferd S, et al. Increased error-related brain activity in six-year-old children with clinical anxiety. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41(8):1257–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kessler RC, DuPont RL, Berglund P, Wittchen H-U. Impairment in pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and major depression at 12 months in two national surveys. Am J Psychiatr. 1999;156(12):1915–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinberg A, Klein DN, Hajcak G. Increased error-related brain activity distinguishes generalized anxiety disorder with and without comorbid major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012. doi:10.1037/a0028270.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bress JN, Meyer A, Hajcak G. Differentiating anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(2):238–49. This article demonstrates that the ERN relates uniquely to anxiety, while controlling for depression in a sample of children and adolescents.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Weinberg A, Meyer A, Hale‐Rude E, Perlman G, Kotov R, Klein DN, et al. Error‐related negativity (ERN) and sustained threat: conceptual framework and empirical evaluation in an adolescent sample. Psychophysiology. 2016;53(3):372–85. This study finds that anxiety symptoms relate to an increased ERN, while depression symptoms relate to a decreased ERN in a large sample of adolescent females. Furthermore, findings suggest that a transdiagnostic phenotype (checking) relates to an increased ERN—even when controlling for all other anxiety symptom dimensions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ladouceur CD, Slifka JS, Dahl RE, Birmaher B, Axelson DA, Ryan ND. Altered error-related brain activity in youth with major depression. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012;2(3):351–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer A, Bress JN, Hajcak G, Gibb BE. Maternal depression is related to reduced error-related brain activity in child and adolescent offspring. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;8:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moser JS, Hajcak G, Simons RF. The effects of fear on performance monitoring and attentional allocation. Psychophysiology. 2005;42(3):261–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rabinak CA, Holman A, Angstadt M, Kennedy AE, Hajcak G, Phan KL. Neural response to errors in combat-exposed returning veterans with and without post-traumatic stress disorder: a preliminary event-related potential study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2013;213(1):71–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moser JS, Moran TP, Jendrusina AA. Parsing relationships between dimensions of anxiety and action monitoring brain potentials in female undergraduates. Psychophysiology. 2012;49(1):3–10. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01279.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull. 1955;52(4):281–302. doi:10.1037/h0040957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hajcak G, Meyer A, Kotov R. Neural psychometrics: from brain activity to reliable and valid biomarkers. J Abnorm Psychol. Invited submission.

  27. Olvet DM, Hajcak G. Reliability of error-related brain activity. Brain Res. 2009;1284:89–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weinberg A, Hajcak G. Longer term test–retest reliability of error-related brain activity. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(10):1420–5. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01206.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer A, Riesel A, Proudfit GH. Reliability of the ERN across multiple tasks as a function of increasing errors. Psychophysiology. 2013;50:1200–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer A, Bress J, Proudfit GH. Psychometric properties of the error-related negativity in children and adolescents. Psychophysiology. 2014;51:602–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Larson MJ, Baldwin SA, Good DA, Fair JE. Brief reports: temporal stability of the error-related negativity (ERN) and post-error positivity (Pe): the role of number of trials. Psychophysiology. 2010;47(6):1167–71. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01022.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Heath AC. Heritability of frontal brain function related to action monitoring. Psychophysiology. 2008;45(4):524–34. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00664.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Carrasco M, Harbin SM, Nienhuis JK, Fitzgerald KD, Gehring WJ, Hanna GL. Increased error-related brain activity in youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder and unaffected siblings eased error‐related brain activity in youth with obsessive‐compulsive disorder and unaffected siblings. Depression Anxiety. 2013;30(1):39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Riesel A, Endrass T, Kaufmann C, Kathmann N. Overactive error-related brain activity as a candidate endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from unaffected first-degree relatives. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(3):317–24. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10030416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Torpey DC, Hajcak G, Kim J, Kujawa A, Klein DN. Electrocortical and behavioral measures of response monitoring in young children during a Go/No-Go task. Dev Psychobiol. 2011. doi:10.1002/dev.20590.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Meyer A, Hajcak G, Torpey-Newman DC, Kujawa A, Klein DN. Enhanced error-related brain activity in children predicts the onset of anxiety disorders between the ages of 6 and 9. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015;124(2):266. This study presents data suggesting that the ERN can predict new onset anxiety disorders in young children while controlling baseline symptoms—thereby suggesting the ERN may be a useful biomarker of risk.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Meyer A, Danielson CK, Danzig AP, Bhatia V, Bromet E, Carlson G, et al. Neural reactivity to mistakes and temperamental fearfulness prospectively predict the impact of Hurricane Sandy stressors on internalizing symptoms in children. JAACAP. Under Review.

  38. McDermott JM, Perez-Edgar K, Henderson HA, Chronis-Tuscano A, Pine DS, Fox NA. A history of childhood behavioral inhibition and enhanced response monitoring in adolescence are linked to clinical anxiety. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65(5):445–8. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lahat A, Lamm C, Chronis-Tuscano A, Pine DS, Henderson HA, Fox NA. Early behavioral inhibition and increased error monitoring predict later social phobia symptoms in childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53:447–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Biomarkers with a mechanistic focus. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(7):633–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Agam Y, Hämäläinen MS, Lee AK, Dyckman KA, Friedman JS, Isom M, et al. Multimodal neuroimaging dissociates hemodynamic and electrophysiological correlates of error processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(42):17556–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Brázdil M, Roman R, Daniel P, Rektor I. Intracerebral error-related negativity in a simple go/nogo task. J Psychophysiol. 2005;19(4):244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science. 1998;280(5364):747–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kiehl KA, Liddle PF, Hopfinger JB. Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event‐related fMRI study. Psychophysiology. 2000;37(2):216–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mathalon DH, Whitfield SL, Ford JM. Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI. Biol Psychol. 2003;64(1–2):119–41. doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00105-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Godlove DC, Emeric EE, Segovis CM, Young MS, Schall JD, Woodman GF. Event-related potentials elicited by errors during the stop-signal task. I. Macaque monkeys. J Neurosci. 2011;31(44):15640–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ito S, Stuphorn V, Brown JW, Schall JD. Performance monitoring by the anterior cingulate cortex during saccade countermanding. Science. 2003;302(5642):120–2. doi:10.1126/science.1087847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Narayanan NS, Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ, Laubach M. Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(12):1888–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Nelson BD, Jackson F, Amir N, Hajcak G. Single-session attention bias modification and error-related brain activity. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015;15(4):776–86.

  50. Riesel A, Weinberg A, Endrass T, Kathmann N, Hajcak G. Punishment has a lasting impact on error‐related brain activity. Psychophysiology. 2012;49(2):239–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Meyer A, Proudfit GH, Bufferd SJ, Kujawa AJ, Laptook RS, Torpey DC, et al. Self-reported and observed punitive parenting prospectively predicts increased error-related negativity in six-year-old children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015;43(5)821–9.

  52. Enriquez-Geppert S, Huster RJ, Herrmann CS. Boosting brain functions: improving executive functions with behavioral training, neurostimulation, and neurofeedback. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013;88(1):1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Reinhart RM, Woodman GF. Causal control of medial–frontal cortex governs electrophysiological and behavioral indices of performance monitoring and learning. J Neurosci. 2014;34(12):4214–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Florida State University, 1107 W Call St., Tallahassee, FL, 32303, USA

    Alexandria Meyer Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Alexandria Meyer Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandria Meyer Ph.D..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Alexandria Meyer declares that she has no conflict of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mood Disorders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meyer, A. Developing Psychiatric Biomarkers: a Review Focusing on the Error-Related Negativity as a Biomarker for Anxiety. Curr Treat Options Psych 3, 356–364 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-016-0094-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-016-0094-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation