Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a New Curvilinear Allometric Model to Improve the Fit and Validity of the 20-m Shuttle Run Test as a Predictor of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults and Youth

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 20 May 2021

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 20 May 2021

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Doubts have been raised concerning the validity of the 20-m shuttle-run test (20 mSRT) as a predictor of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in youth based on Léger’s equation/model. An alternative allometric model has been published recently that is thought to provide, not only a superior fit (criterion validity) but also a more biologically and physiologically interpretable model (construct validity). The purposes of this study were to explore whether allometry can provide a more valid predictor of CRF using 20 mSRT compared with Léger’s equation/model.

Methods

We fitted and compared Léger’s original model and an alternative allometric model using two cross-sectional datasets (youth, n = 306; adult n = 105) that contained measurements of CRF (\(\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}}\)/\(\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}\)) and 20 mSRT performance. Quality-of-fit was assessed using explained variance (R2) and Bland and Altman’s limits of agreement.

Results

The allometric models provided superior fits for the youth (explained variance R2 = 71.9%) and adult (R2 = 77.7%) datasets compared with Léger’s equation using their original fixed (R2 = 35.2%) or re-estimated parameter models (R2 = 65.9%), confirming that the allometric models demonstrate acceptable criterion validity. However, the allometric models also identified a non-linear “J-shaped” increase in energy cost (\(\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}}\)/\(\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}\)) with faster final shuttle-run speeds (fitted speed exponent = 1.52; 95% CI 1.38–1.65).

Conclusion

Not only do allometric models provide more accurate predictions of CRF (\(\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}}\)/\(\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{{\text{2max}}}}\); ml kg−1 min−1) for both youth and adults (evidence of criterion validity), the “J-shaped” rise in energy demand with increasing final shuttle-run speed also provides the evidence of construct validity, resulting in a more plausible, physiologically sound, and interpretable model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong N. Welsman J Twenty-metre shuttle run: (mis)representation, (mis)interpretation and (mis)use. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53:1199. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Léger LA, Olds TS, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, et al. Response to criticisms of the 20 m shuttle run test: deflections, distortions and distractions. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53:1200–1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Welsman J, Armstrong N. The 20 m shuttle run is not a valid test of cardiorespiratory fitness in boys aged 11–14 years. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019;5:e000627. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000627.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nevill A, Rowland T, Goff D, Martel L, Ferrone L. Scaling or normalising maximum oxygen uptake to predict 1-mile run time in boys. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;92:285–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1071-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nevill AM, Ramsbottom R, Williams C. Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65:110–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00705066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Léger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640418808729800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nevill AM, Myers J, Kaminsky LA, Arena R. Improving reference equations for cardiorespiratory fitness using multiplicative allometric rather than additive linear models: data from the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database Registry. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;62:515–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2019.11.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramírez-Vélez R, Rodrigues-Bezerra D, Correa-Bautista JE, Izquierdo M, Lobelo F. Reliability of health-related physical fitness tests among colombian children and adolescents: the FUPRECOL Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0140875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart A. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. Potchefstroom: International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; 2011 (ISBN 0620362073).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Council of Europe. Eurofit: handbook for the Eurofit tests of physical fitness. Rome: Council of Europe; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramsbottom R, Brewer J, Williams C. A progressive shuttle run test to estimate maximal oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med. 1988;22:141–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.22.4.141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nevill A, Holder R. Modelling maximum oxygen uptake, a case-study in non-linear regression model formulation and comparison. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 1994;43:653–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Draper N, Smith H. Applied regression analysis (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) Hardcover). New York: Wiley; 1981 (ISBN 10: 0471170828).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nevill AM, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31:314–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.31.4.314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Frost G, Bar-Or O, Dowling J, Dyson K. Explaining differences in the metabolic cost and efficiency of treadmill locomotion in children. J Sports Sci. 2002;20:451–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410252925125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wells JC. Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;21(3):415–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2007.04.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pettersen SA, Fredriksen PM, Ingjer E. The correlation between peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and running performance in children and adolescents. Aspects of different units. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001;11(4):223–8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2001.110405.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harms CA. Does gender affect pulmonary function and exercise capacity? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2006;151(2–3):124–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2005.10.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buckley JP, Cardoso FMF, Birkett ST, Sandercock GRH. Oxygen costs of the incremental shuttle walk test in cardiac rehabilitation participants: an historical and contemporary analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46:1953–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0521-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1986. https://doi.org/10.2310/6640.2004.00030

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of postgraduate students (Jose Nelson Gil, Daniel Prieto, and Alejandra Hernandez) that carried out the implementation and data collection, and Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista, PhD from CEMA-UR for excellent technical support for facilitating this study (Colombia Study). This article is part of the master thesis submitted by CEB-G, from the University of Rosario, Colombia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan M. Nevill.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No financial support was received for the conduct of this study or preparation of this article.

Conflict of interest

Alan Nevill, Roger Ramsbottom, Gavin Sandercock, Carlos Eduardo Bocachica-González, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, and Grant Tomkinson have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Rosario University Board (Code DVO005-1–383-CEI874).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participating teams in the study.

Patient consent for publication

Not required.

Data availability statement

Data are available on request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author contributions

AMN analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. RR, CEB-G, RR-V, and GS designed the study, directed implementation, and data collection. AMN, RR, and GT edited the manuscript for intellectual content and provided critical comments on the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nevill, A.M., Ramsbottom, R., Sandercock, G. et al. Developing a New Curvilinear Allometric Model to Improve the Fit and Validity of the 20-m Shuttle Run Test as a Predictor of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults and Youth. Sports Med 51, 1581–1589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01346-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01346-0

Navigation