Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconceptualizing and Operationalizing Seefeldt’s Proficiency Barrier: Applications and Future Directions

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1980, Seefeldt introduced the concept of a motor skill “proficiency barrier” that provides a conceptual basis for understanding the importance of a motor skill barrier as it relates to critical public health initiatives. While the intent of Seefeldt’s proficiency barrier hypothesis had great potential to advance the field of motor development, the notion of a proficiency barrier was not empirically tested. Instead, this concept lay dormant for several decades. The purpose of this paper was to expand upon Seefeldt’s proficiency barrier concept in greater detail by addressing the following questions: (1) what constitutes a motor proficiency barrier? (2) how do we assess/measure the existence of a proficiency barrier? and (3) how do we break through the proficiency barrier in order to maximize the likelihood of participation in health-enhancing levels of physical activity later on in life? We conclude with a future research suggestion to explore the existence of the proficiency barrier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Adapted with permission from Haywood and Getchell [50]

Fig. 3

Adapted with permission from Haywood and Getchell [50]. Also adapted with permission from Clark and Phillips [40]

Fig. 4

Adapted with permission from Roberton and Halverson [80]. Also adapted with permission from Roberton and Halverson [44]

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Fact sheet: obesity and overweight. 2018. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Cited 14 Dec 2019.

  2. Basterfield L, Adamson AJ, Frary JK, Parkinson KN, Pearce MS, Reilly JJ. Longitudinal study of physical activity and sedentary behavior in children. Pediatrics. 2011;127(1):e24–e30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brian A, Pennell A, Taunton S, Starrett A, Howard-Shaughnessy C, Goodway JD, et al. Motor competence levels and developmental delay in early childhood: a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in the USA. Sports Med. 2019;49(10):1609–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Myer GD, Faigenbaum AD, Edwards NM, Clark JF, Best TM, Sallis RE. Sixty minutes of what? A developing brain perspective for activating children with an integrative exercise approach. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(23):1510–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer S, Roberton MA, Rudisill ME, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of physical competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60:290–306.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cairney J, Dudley D, Kwan M, Bulten R, Kriellaars D. Physical literacy, physical activity and health: toward an evidence-informed conceptual model. Sports Med. 2019;49(3):371–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Álvarez-Bueno C, Pesce C, Cavero-Redondo I, Sánchez-López M, Martínez-Hortelano JA, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. The effect of physical activity interventions on children’s cognition and metacognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(9):729–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hulteen RM, Morgan PJ, Barnett L, Stodden DF, Lubans DR. Development of foundational movement skills: a conceptual model for physical activity across the lifespan. Sports Med. 2018;48(7):1533–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lima RA, Bugge A, Ersbøll AK, Stodden DF, Andersen LB. The longitudinal relationship between motor competence and measures of fatness and fitness from childhood into adolescence. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2019;95(4):482–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lima RA, Pfeiffer KA, Larsen LR, Bugge A, Moller NC, Andersen LB, et al. Physical activity and motor competence present a positive reciprocal longitudinal relationship across childhood and early adolescence. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14(6):440–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lima RA, Pfeiffer KA, Bugge A, Møller N, Andersen LB, Stodden DF. Motor competence and cardiorespiratory fitness have greater influence on body fatness than physical activity across time. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27(12):1638–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cattuzzo MT, dos Santos HR, Ré AHN, de Oliveira IS, Melo BM, de Sousa MM, et al. Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(2):123–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Utesch T, Dreiskämper D, Strauss B, Naul R. The development of the physical fitness construct across childhood. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(1):212–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D'Hondt E, Deforche B, Gentier I, Verstuyf J, Vaeyens R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. A longitudinal study of gross motor coordination and weight status in children. Obesity. 2014;22(6):1505–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodrigues LP, Stodden DF, Lopes VP. Developmental pathways of change in fitness and motor competence are related to overweight and obesity status at the end of primary school. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(1):87–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson L, Stodden DF, Barnett L, Lopes VP, Logan S, Rodrigues LP, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1273–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barnett L, Morgan PJ, van Beurden E, Beard JR. Perceived sports competence mediates the relationship between childhood motor skill proficiency and adolescent physical activity and fitness: a longitudinal assessment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:40–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Seefeldt V. Developmental motor patterns: Implications for elementary school physical education. In: Nadeau C, Holliwell W, Roberts G, editors. Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1980. p. 314–323.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V. Acquisition of motor skills during childhood. In: Seefeldt V, editor. Physical activity and well-being. Reston: AAPHERD Publications; 1986. p. 49–102.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malina RM. Top 10 research questions related to growth and maturation of relevance to physical activity, performance, and fitness. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014;85(2):157–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stodden DF, True L, Langendorfer S, Gao Z. Associations among selected motor skills and health-related fitness: Indirect evidence for Seefeldt’s proficiency barrier in young adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84:397–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Meester A, Stodden DF, Goodway JD, True L, Brian A, Ferkel R, et al. Identifying a motor proficiency barrier for meeting physical activity guidelines in children. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(1):58–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haywood K, Getchell N. Life span motor development. 6th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Breniére Y, Bril B. Development of postural control of gravity forces in children during the first 5 years of walking. Exp Brain Res. 1998;121(3):255–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clark JE, Phillips SJ. A longitudinal study of intralimb coordination in the first year of independent walking: a dynamical systems analysis. Child Dev. 1993;64(4):1143–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Forssberg H. Ontogeny of human locomotor control I. Infant stepping, supported locomotion and transition to independent locomotion. Exp Brain Res. 1985;57(3):480–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gesell A. The ontogenesis of infant behavior. In: Carmichael L, editor. Manual of child psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1954. p. 335–373.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gesell A, Thompson H. The psychology of early growth including norms of infant behavior and a method of genetic analysis. New York: Macmillan; 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shirley M. The first two years: a study of twenty five babies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McGraw MB. Growth: a study of Johnny and Jimmy. New York: Appleton-Century; 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Langendorfer S, Roberton MA. Individual pathways in the development of forceful throwing. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(3):245–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernstein N. The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wickstrom RL. Fundamental motor patterns. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Adolph KE, Vereijken B, Shrout PE. What changes in infant walking and why. Child Dev. 2003;74(2):475–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Clark JE, Whitall J, Phillips SJ. Human interlimb coordination: the first 6 months of independent walking. Dev Psychobiol. 1988;21(5):445–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Branta C, Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V. Age changes in motor skills during childhood and adolescence. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1984;12:467–520.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Roberton MA. Changing motor patterns during childhood. In: Thomas J, editor. Motor development during childhood and adolescence. Minneapolis: Burgess; 1984. p. 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Getchell N, Roberton MA. Whole body stiffness as a function of developmental level in children's hopping. DP. 1989;25(6):920.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Halverson L, Williams K. Developmental sequences for hopping over distance: a prelongitudinal screening. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1985;56(1):37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Clark JE, Phillips SJ. A developmental sequence of the long jump. In: Clark JE, Humphrey J, editors. Motor development: current selected research. Trenton: Princeton Book Company; 1985. p. 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Seefeldt V, Reuschlein S, Vogel P. Sequencing motor skills within the physical education curriculum. Houston: American Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Burnett CN, Johnson EW. Development of gait in childhood: part II. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971;13(2):207–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Whitall J, Getchell N. From walking to running: applying a dynamical systems approach to the development of locomotor skills. Child Dev. 1995;66(5):1541–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Roberton MA, Halverson L. The development of locomotor coordination: longitudinal change and invariance. J Mot Behav. 1988;20(3):197–241.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nesbitt D, Molina S, Sacko RS, Robinson L, Brian A, Stodden DF. Examining the feasibility of supine-to-stand as a measure of functional motor competence. J Mot Learn Dev. 2018;6(2):267–86.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stodden DF, Langendorfer S, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR. Kinematic constraints associated with the acquisition of overarm throwing part I: step and trunk actions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006;77(4):417–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stodden DF, Langendorfer S, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR. Kinematic constraints associated with the acquisition of overarm throwing part II: upper extremity actions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006;77(4):428–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Langendorfer S, Roberton MA, Stodden DF. Biomechanical aspects of the development of object projection skills. In: De Ste CM, Korff T, editors. Paediatric biomechanics and motor control: theory and application. Oxford: Routledge; 2011. p. 180–206.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Brian A, Taunton S. Effectiveness of motor skill intervention varies based on implementation strategy. Phys Educ Sport Pedag. 2018;23(2):222–33.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Haywood K, Getchell N. Life span motor development. 7th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kugler PN, Kelso JS, Turvey M. On the control and co-ordination of naturally developing systems. In: Kelso JS, Clark JE, editors. The development of movement control and coordination. Hoboken: Wiley; 1982. p. 5–78.

    Google Scholar 

  52. New South Wales Department of Education and Training. Get Skilled Get Active: A K-6 Resource to Support the Teaching of Fundamental Movement Skills. New South Wales (Australia): Multimedia Production Services Centre for Learning Innovation; 2005.

  53. Ulrich DA. TGMD-3: Test of Gross Motor Development. 3rd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Brian A, Goodway JD, Logan JA, Sutherland S. SKIPing with teachers: an early years motor skill intervention. Phys Educ Sport Pedag. 2017;22(3):270–82.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade M, Whiting H, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff; 1986. p. 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Clark JE. A dynamical systems perspective on the development of complex adaptive skill. In: Dent-Read C, Zukow-Goldring P, editors. Evolving explanations of development: ecological approaches to organism-environment systems. Washington: APA Publications; 1997. p. 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brian A, Bardid F, Barnett L, Deconinck F, Goodway JD. Cross-cultural differences between Belgian and American youth in perceived and actual motor skills. J Mot Learn Dev. 2018;6(S2):S320–S326326.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jaakkola T, Yli-Piipari S, Huotari P, Watt A, Liukkonen J. Fundamental movement skills and physical fitness as predictors of physical activity: a 6-year follow-up study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(1):74–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Barnett L, Zask A, Rose L, Hughes D, Adams J. Three-year follow-up of an early childhood intervention: what about physical activity and weight status? J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(3):319–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zask A, Barnett L, Rose L, Brooks LO, Molyneux M, Hughes D, et al. Three year follow-up of an early childhood intervention: is movement skill sustained? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):127.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lai SK, Costigan SA, Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Stodden DF, Salmon J, et al. Do school-based interventions focusing on physical activity, fitness, or fundamental movement skill competency produce a sustained impact in these outcomes in children and adolescents? A systematic review of follow-up studies. Sports Med. 2014;44(1):67–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Brian A, Goodway JD, Logan JA, Sutherland S. SKIPing with head start teachers: influence of T-SKIP on object-control skills. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017;88(4):479–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Goodway JD, Branta C. Influence of a motor skill intervention on fundamental motor skill development of disadvantaged preschool children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003;74(1):36–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Valentini NC, Rudisill ME. Motivational climate, motor-skill development, and perceived competence: two studies of developmentally delayed kindergarten children. J Teach Phys Educ. 2004;23(3):216–34.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Van Capelle A, Broderick CR, van Doorn N, Ward RE, Parmenter BJ. Interventions to improve fundamental motor skills in pre-school aged children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(7):658–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wick K, Leeger-Aschmann CS, Monn ND, Radtke T, Ott LV, Rebholz CE, et al. Interventions to promote fundamental movement skills in childcare and kindergarten: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2017;47(10):2045–68.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Pope ML, Liu T, Getchell N. Object-control skills in hispanic preschool children enrolled in head start. Percept Mot Skills. 2011;112(1):193–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Logan S, Scrabis-Fletcher K, Modlesky C, Getchell N. The relationship between motor skill proficiency and body mass index in preschool children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(3):442–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Riethmuller AM, Jones RA, Okely AD. Efficacy of interventions to improve motor development in young children: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009;124(4):e782–e792792.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Logan S, Robinson L, Wilson A, Lucas W. Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(3):305–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Roberton MA. Put that target away until later: developing skill in object projection. Future Focus. 1996;17(1):6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Haff GG, Triplett TN. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 4th ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Southard D. Throwing pattern: changes in timing of joint lag according to age between and within skill level. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(2):213–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Freitas DL, Lausen B, Maia JA, Lefevre J, Gouveia ÉR, Thomis M, et al. Skeletal maturation, fundamental motor skills and motor coordination in children 7–10 years. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(9):924–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Getchell N, Schott N, Brian A. Putting the development back in development: research methods and designs. J Mot Learn Dev. 2020;8(2):410–37.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sacko RS, Brazendale K, Brian A, McIver K, Nesbitt D, Pfeifer C, et al. Comparison of indirect calorimetry- and accelerometry-based energy expenditure during object project skill performance. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2019;23(2):148–58.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Sacko RS, McIver K, Brazendale K, Pfeifer C, Brian A, Nesbitt D, et al. Comparison of indirect calorimetry-and accelerometry-based energy expenditure during children‘s discrete skill performance. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019;90(4):629–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Clark JE. On the problem of motor skill development. J Phys Educ Recreat Dance. 2007;78(5):38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Roberton MA, Halverson LE. Developing children: their changing movement. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Brian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Ali Brian, Nancy Getchell, Larissa True, An De Meester and David Stodden declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors provided consent for publication.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Author contributions

AB, NG, and DS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AB, NG, DS, LT, and AD revised the original manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brian, A., Getchell, N., True, L. et al. Reconceptualizing and Operationalizing Seefeldt’s Proficiency Barrier: Applications and Future Directions. Sports Med 50, 1889–1900 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01332-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01332-6

Navigation