Skip to main content
Log in

A Social Identity Approach to Sport Psychology: Principles, Practice, and Prospects

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on social identity theory and self-categorization theory, we outline an approach to sport psychology that understands groups not simply as features of sporting contexts but rather as elements that can be, and often are, incorporated into a person’s sense of self and, through this, become powerful determinants of their sport-related behavior. The underpinnings of this social identity approach are outlined, and four key lessons for sport that are indicative of the analytical and practical power of the approach are presented. These suggest that social identity is the basis for sports group (1) behavior, (2) formation and development, (3) support and stress appraisal, and (4) leadership. Building on recent developments within sport science, we outline an agenda for future research by identifying a range of topics to which the social identity approach could fruitfully contribute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tajfel H. Social categorization. In: Moscovici S, editor. Introduction à la psychologie sociale. Paris: Larousse; 1972. p. 272–302.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks-Cole; 1979. p. 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Turner JC. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Tajfel H, editor. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982. p. 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Turner JC. Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In: Lawler EJ, editor. Advances in group processes. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1985. p. 77–122.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, et al. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lavallee D, Kremer J, Williams M, et al. Sport psychology: Contemporary themes. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruner MW, Dunlop WL, Beauchamp MR. A social identity perspective on group processes in sport and exercise. In: Beauchamp MR, Eys MA, editors. Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin L, Bruner M, Eys M, et al. The social environment in sport: selected topics. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014;7:87–105. doi:10.1080/1750984x.2014.885553.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tajfel H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci Am. 1970;223(5):96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tajfel H. Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sherif M. Experiments in group conflict. Sci Am. 1956;195(5):54–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sherif M, Harvey OJ, White BJ, et al. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: the Robbers Cave experiment. Norman: University Book Exchange; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turner JC. Social comparison and social identity: some prospects for intergroup behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1975;5(1):5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cikara M, Botvinick MM, Fiske ST. Us versus them: social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(3):306–13. doi:10.1177/0956797610397667.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burns EB. When the saints went marching in: social identity in the World Champion New Orleans Saints football team and its impact on their host city. J Sport Soc Issues. 2014;38(2):148–63. doi:10.1177/0193723513499920.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gwinner K, Swanson SR. A model of fan identification: antecedents and sponsorship outcomes. J Serv Market. 2003;17(3):275–94.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanderson J. From loving the hero to despising the villain: sports fans, facebook, and social identity threats. Mass Commun Soc. 2013;16(4):487–509. doi:10.1080/15205436.2012.730650.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Whigham S. ‘Anyone but England’? Exploring anti-English sentiment as part of Scottish national identity in sport. Int Rev Sociol Sport. 2014;49(2):152–74. doi:10.1177/1012690212454359.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amiot CE, Sansfaçon S, Louis WR. How normative and social identification processes predict self-determination to engage in derogatory behaviours against outgroup hockey fans. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2014;44(3):216–30. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ellemers N. The group self. Science. 2012;336(6083):848–52. doi:10.1126/Science.1220987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lalonde RN. The dynamics of group differentiation in the face of defeat. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1992;18(3):336–42. doi:10.1177/0146167292183010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosen S, Sanderson A. Labour markets in professional sports. Econ J. 2001;111(469):F47–68. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00598.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tharp RG, Gallimore R. Basketball’s John Wooden: what a coach can teach a teacher. Psychol Today. 1976;9(8):74–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schurtz DR, Combs D, Hoogland C, et al. Social identity in sports and politics: a social identity persepctive. In: van Dijk WW, Ouwerkerk JW, editors. Schadenfreude: understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others. Cambridge: University Press; 2014. p. 170–85.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, Turner JC. Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meân LJ, Kassing JW. Identities at youth sporting events: a critical discourse analysis. Int J Sport Commun. 2008;1:42–66.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Joncheray H, Level M, Richard R. Identity socialization and construction within the French national rugby union women’s team. Int Rev Sociol Sport. 2014. doi:10.1177/1012690213517108.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leary MR, Wheeler DS, Jenkins TB. Aspects of identity and behavioral preference: studies of occupational and recreational choice. Soc Psychol Q. 1986;49(1):11–8. doi:10.2307/2786853.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kopietz R, Echterhoff G. Remembering the 2006 Football World Cup in Germany: epistemic and social consequences of perceived memory sharedness. Mem Studies. 2014;7(3):298–313. doi:10.1177/1750698014530620.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Turner JC. Social influence. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1991.

  31. Haslam SA, Postmes T, Ellemers N. More than a metaphor: organizational identity makes organizational life possible. Br J Manag. 2003;14(4):357–69. doi:10.1111/J.1467-8551.2003.00384.X.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reicher SD, Spears R, Postmes T. A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In: Strobe W, Hewstone M, editors. European review of social psychology. Chichester: Wiley; 1995. p. 161–98.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Turner JC, Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, et al. Self and collective: cognition and social-context. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1994;20(5):454–63. doi:10.1177/0146167294205002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Haslam SA. Psychology in organizations: the social identity approach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Turner JC, Oakes PJ. The socially structured mind. In: McGarty C, Haslam SA, editors. The message of social psychology: perspectives on mind in society. Oxford: Blackwell; 1997. p. 355–73.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Couvelaere V, Richelieu A. Brand strategy in professional sports: the case of French soccer teams. Eur Sport Manage Q. 2005;5(1):23–46. doi:10.1080/16184740500089524.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Trail GT, Robinson MJ, Dick RJ, Gillentine AJ. Motives and points of attachment: fans versus spectators in intercollegiate athletics. Sport Market Q. 2003;12(4):217–27.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wann DL, Branscombe NR. Emotional responses to the sports page. J Sport Soc Issues. 1992;16(1):49–64. doi:10.1177/019372359201600104.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Green BC. Leveraging subculture and identity to promote sport events. Sport Manage Rev. 2001;4(1):1–19. doi:10.1016/S1441-3523(01)70067-8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Heere B, James JD. Stepping outside the lines: developing a multi-dimensional team identity scale based on social identity theory. Sport Manage Rev. 2007;10(1):65–91. doi:10.1016/S1441-3523(07)70004-9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hickman TM, Lawrence KE, Ward JC. A social identities perspective on the effects of corporate sport sponsorship on employees. Sport Market Q. 2005;14:148–57.

    Google Scholar 

  42. James J, Kolbe R, Trail G. Psychological connection to a new sport team: building or maintaining the consumer base. Sport Market Q. 2002;11(4):215–25.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Madrigal R. Social identity effects in a belief–attitude–intentions hierarchy: implications for corporate sponsorship. Psychol Market. 2001;18(2):145–65. doi:10.1002/1520-6793(200102)18:2<145:aid-mar1003>3.0.co;2-t.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Trail GT, Anderson DF, Fink JS. Consumer satisfaction and identity theory: a model of sport spectator conative loyalty. Sport Market Q. 2005;14:98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Underwood R, Bond E, Baer R. Building service brands via social identity: lessons from the sports marketplace. J Market Theory Pract. 2001;9(1):1–13. doi:10.2307/40470193.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Doosje B, Haslam SA, Spears R, et al. The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements and the evaluation of group characteristics. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1998;28(2):173–84. doi:10.1002/(Sici)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<173:Aid-Ejsp862>3.0.Co;2-Z.

    Google Scholar 

  47. van Rijswijk W, Haslam SA, Ellemers N. Who do we think we are? The effects of social context and social identification on in-group stereotyping. Br J Soc Psychol. 2006;45:161–74. doi:10.1348/014466605x39475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kleinert J, Ohlert J, Carron B, et al. Group dynamics in sports: an overview and recommendations on diagnostic and intervention. Sport Psychol. 2012;26(3):412–34.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Humberstone B. ‘In splendid isolation’: is the field missing something? In: Turcova I, Martin A, editors. Outdoor activities in educational and recreational programmes. Prague: Charles University Press; 2009. p. 40–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Boyle BA, Magnusson P. Social identity and brand equity formation: a comparative study of collegiate sports fans. J Sport Manage. 2007;21(4):497–520.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Madrigal R. The influence of social alliances with sports teams on intentions to purchase corporate sponsors’ products. J Advert. 2000;29(4):13–24. doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673621.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Carron AV, Eys MA, Burke SM. Team cohesion. In: Jowett S, Lavallee D, editors. Social psychology in sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2007. p. 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bruner MW, Eys MA, Beauchamp MR, et al. Examining the origins of team building in sport: a citation network and genealogical approach. Group Dyn. 2013;17(1):30–42. doi:10.1037/A0030114.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pescosolido AT, Saavedra R. Cohesion and sports teams: a review. Small Group Res. 2012;43(6):744–58. doi:10.1177/1046496412465020.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Druckman D. Be all that you can be: enhancing human performance. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34(11):2234–60. doi:10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.Tb01975.X.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Carron AV, Brawley LR, Widmeyer WN. Measurement of cohesion in sport and exercise. In: Duda JL, editor. Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown: Fitness Information Technology; 1998. p. 213–26.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Carron AV, Widmeyer WN, Brawley LR. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. J Sport Psychol. 1985;7(3):244–66.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bernache-Assollant L, Lacassagne MF, Braddock JH. Basking in reflected glory and blasting: differences in identity-management strategies between two groups of highly identified soccer fans. J Lang Soc Psychol. 2007;26(4):381–8. doi:10.1177/0261927x07306981.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bristow DN, Sebastian RJ. Holy cow! Wait ’til next year! A closer look at the brand loyalty of Chicago Cubs baseball fans. J Cons Market. 2001;18(3):256–75. doi:10.1108/07363760110392976.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Farred G. Long distance love: growing up a Liverpool Football Club fan. J Sport Soc Issues. 2002;26:6–24. doi:10.1177/0193723502261002.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wann DL, Branscombe NR. Die-hard and fair-weather fans: effects of identification on BIRGing and CORFing tendencies. J Sport Soc Issues. 1990;14(2):103–17. doi:10.1177/019372359001400203.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hogg MA. The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hughson J. Soccer support and social identity: finding the ‘Thirdspace’. Int Rev Sociol Sport. 1998;33(4):403–9. doi:10.1177/101269098033004007.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Funk DC, James J. The psychological continuum model: a conceptual framework for understanding an individual’s psychological connection to sport. Sport Manage Rev. 2001;4:119–50.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Funk DC, Ridinger LL, Moorman AM. Exploring origins of involvement: understanding the relationship between consumer motives and involvement with professional sport teams. Leis Sci. 2004;26(1):35–61. doi:10.1080/01490400490272440.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ellemers N, De Gilder D, Haslam SA. Motivating individuals and groups at work: a social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Acad Manage Rev. 2004;29(3):459–78.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gay S. Welcome to the home of the big “G”: Green Bay Packers #1 tailgate. 2014. http://www.thebigg.info/. Retrieved 2014.

  68. Dimmock JA, Grove JR, Eklund RC. Reconceptualizing team identification: new dimensions and their relationship to intergroup bias. Group Dyn. 2005;9(2):75–86. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.2.75.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lock D, Darcy S, Taylor T. Starting with a clean slate: an analysis of member identification with a new sports team. Sport Manage Rev. 2009;12(1):15–25. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2008.09.001.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lock D, Taylor T, Darcy S. In the absence of achievement: the formation of new team identification. Eur Sport Manage Q. 2011;11(2):171–92. doi:10.1080/16184742.2011.559135.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lock D, Taylor T, Funk D, et al. Exploring the development of team identification. J Sport Manage. 2012;26(4):283–94.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Theodorakis ND, Wann DL, Nassis P, Luellen TB. The relationship between sport team identification and the need to belong. Int J Sport Manage Market. 2012;12:25–38. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2012.051249.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wann DL. Understanding the positive social psychological benefits of sport team identification: the team identification-social psychological health model. Group Dyn. 2006;10(4):272–96. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.272.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wann DL, Grieve FG. Biased evaluations of in-group and out-group spectator behavior at sporting events: the importance of team identification and threats to social identity. J Soc Psychol. 2005;145(5):531–46. doi:10.3200/socp.145.5.531-546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fink JS, Parker HM, Brett M, et al. Off-field behavior of athletes and team identification: using social identity theory and balance theory to explain fan reactions. J Sport Manage. 2009;23(2):142–55.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Madrigal R. Cognitive and affective determinants of fan satisfaction with sporting event attendance. J Leis Res. 1995;27(3):205–27.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wakefield KL. The pervasive effects of social influence on sporting event attendance. J Sport Soc Issues. 1995;19(4):335–51. doi:10.1177/019372395019004002.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wann DL, Branscombe NR. Sports fans: measuring degree of identification with their team. Int J Sport Psychol. 1993;24(1):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Turner PJ, et al. Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. Br J Soc Psychol. 1984;23:97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Queenan J. True believers: the tragic inner life of sports fans. New York: Picador; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  81. End CM, Dietz-Uhler B, Harrick EA, et al. Identifying with winners: a reexamination of sport fans’ tendency to BIRG. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(5):1017–30. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00253.x.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cialdini RB, Borden RJ, Thorne A, et al. Basking in reflected glory: 3 (football) field studies. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;34(3):366–75. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.34.3.366.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hirt ER, Zillmann D, Erickson GA, et al. Costs and benefits of allegiance: changes in fans’ self-ascribed competences after team victory versus defeat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63(5):724–38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.724.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Partridge JA, Wann DL, Elison J. Understanding college sports fans’ experiences of and attempts to cope with shame. J Sport Behav. 2010;33:160–75.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Akerlof GA, Kranton RE. Identity economics: how our identities shape our work, wages, and well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Coerts S. Robben not the type of player to make sacrifices, says Van der Wiel. 2014. http://www.goal.com/en-us/news/1956/europe/2012/07/27/3269075/robben-not-the-type-of-player-to-make-sacrifices-says-van. Retrieved 2014.

  87. Bloom M. The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Acad Manage J. 1999;42(1):25–40. doi:10.2307/256872.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Papps KL, Bryson A, Gomez R. Heterogeneous worker ability and team-based production: evidence from major league baseball, 1920–2009. Lab Econ. 2011;18(3):310–9. doi:10.1016/J.Labeco.2010.11.005.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Swaab RI, Schaerer M, Anicich EM, et al. The too-much-talent effect: team interdependence determines when more talent is too much or not enough. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(8):1581–91. doi:10.1177/0956797614537280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Fransen K, Haslam SA, Steffens NK, et al. Believing in ‘us’: exploring leaders’ capacity to enhance team confidence and performance by building a sense of shared social identity. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015;21(1):89–100. doi:10.1037/xap0000033.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Gundlach M, Zivnuska S, Stoner J. Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model. Hum Relat. 2006;59(12):1603–32. doi:10.1177/0018726706073193.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Quay J, Stolz SA. Game as context in physical education: a Deweyan philosophical perspective. In: Light R, Quay J, Harvey S, et al., editors. Contemporary developments in games teaching. London and New York: Routledge; 2014. p. 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Hanton S, Neil R, Mellalieu SD. Competitive anxiety and sporting performance. In: Morris T, Terry P, editors. The new sport and exercise psychology companion. West Virginia: Fitness Information Technology; 2011. p. 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Woodman T, Hardy L. Stress and anxiety. In: Singer RN, Hausenblas HA, Janelle CM, editors. Handbook of sport psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2001. p. 290–318.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Folkman S, Chesney M, McKusick L, et al. Translating coping theory into an intervention. In: Eckenrode J, editor. The social context of stress. New York: Plenum; 1991. p. 239–60.

  96. Lazarus RS. Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Freeman P, Rees T. How does perceived support lead to better performance? An examination of potential mechanisms. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2009;21(4):429–41. doi:10.1080/10413200903222913.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Rees T, Freeman P. Social support moderates the relationship between stressors and task performance through self-efficacy. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2009;28(2):244–63. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.2.244.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Rees T, Hardy L. Matching social support with stressors: effects on factors underlying performance in tennis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2004;5(3):319–37. doi:10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00018-9.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Haslam SA, Jetten J, O’Brien A, et al. Social identity, social influence and reactions to potentially stressful tasks: support for the self-categorization model of stress. Stress Health. 2004;20(1):3–9. doi:10.1002/Smi.995.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Gallagher S, Meaney S, Muldoon OT. Social identity influences stress appraisals and cardiovascular reactions to acute stress exposure. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(3):566–79. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12056.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Burnett C. The ‘black cat’ of South African soccer and the Chiefs-Pirates conflict. In: Dunning E, Murphy P, Waddington I, Astrinakis AE, editors. Fighting fans. Football hooliganism as a world phenomenon. Dublin: University College Dublin Press; 2002. p. 174–89.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Davis MC, End CM. A winning proposition: the economic impact of successful national football league franchises. Econ Inq. 2010;48(1):39–50. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00124.x.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Wann DL, Peterson RR, Cothran C, et al. Sport fan aggression and anonymity: the importance of team identification. Soc Behav Personal. 1999;27(6):597–602. doi:10.2224/Sbp.1999.27.6.597.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Wann DL, Culver Z, Akanda R, et al. The effects of team identification and game outcome on willingness to consider anonymous acts of hostile aggression. J Sport Behav. 2005;28(3):282–94.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Leach CW, Spears R, Branscombe NR, et al. Malicious pleasure: schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(5):932–43. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.932.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Smith RH, Powell CAJ, Combs DJY, et al. Exploring the when and why of schadenfreude. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2009;3:530–46. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00181.x.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Haslam SA, O’Brien A, Jetten J, et al. Taking the strain: social identity, social support, and the experience of stress. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005;44:355–70. doi:10.1348/014466605x37468.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Levine M, Cassidy C, Brazier G, et al. Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: two experimental studies. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(7):1452–63. doi:10.1111/J.1559-1816.2002.Tb01446.X.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, et al. Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005;31(4):443–53. doi:10.1177/0146167204271651.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Slater M, Rovira A, Southern R, et al. Bystander responses to a violent incident in an immersive virtual environment. PLoS One. 2013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052766.

  112. Arnold R, Fletcher D, Daniels K. Development and validation of the Organizational Stressor Indicator for Sport Performers (OSI-SP). J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;35(2):180–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Fletcher D, Hanton S, Mellalieu SD. An organizational stress review: conceptual and theoretical issues in competitive sport. In: Hanton S, Mellalieu SD, editors. Literature reviews in sport psychology. New York: Nova Science; 2006. p. 321–73.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Hanton S, Fletcher D, Coughlan G. Stress in elite sport performers: a comparative study of competitive and organizational stressors. J Sports Sci. 2005;23(10):1129–41. doi:10.1080/02640410500131480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745–74. doi:10.1146/Annurev.Psych.55.090902.141456.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Levine RM, Reicher SD. Making sense of symptoms: self-categorization and the meaning of illness and injury. Br J Soc Psychol. 1996;35(2):245–56. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01095.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Cruwys T, Haslam SA, Dingle GA, et al. Depression and social identity: an integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014. doi:10.1177/1088868314523839.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Cruwys T, South EI, Greenaway KH, et al. Social identity reduces depression by fostering positive attributions. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2014. doi:10.1177/1948550614543309.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Hausser JA, Kattenstroth M, van Dick R, et al. “We” are not stressed: social identity in groups buffers neuroendocrine stress reactions. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(4):973–7. doi:10.1016/J.Jesp.2012.02.020.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Haslam SA, Reicher S. Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(5):1037–52. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Branscombe NR, Schmitt MT, Harvey RD. Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: implications for group identification and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(1):135–49. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Suedfeld P. The social psychology of ‘Invictus’: conceptual and methodological approaches to indomitability. In: McGarty C, Haslam SA, editors. The message of social psychology: perspectives on mind in society. Oxford: Blackwell; 1997. p. 328–41.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Thedin Jakobsson B. What makes teenagers continue? A salutogenic approach to understanding youth participation in Swedish club sports. Phys Ed Sport Pedagogy. 2012;19(3):239–52. doi:10.1080/17408989.2012.754003.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Platow MJ. The new psychology of leadership: identity, influence and power. London: Psychology Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Reicher S, Haslam SA, Hopkins N. Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadersh Q. 2005;16(4):547–68. doi:10.1016/J.Leaqua.2005.06.007.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Turner JC, Haslam SA. Social identity, organizations and leadership. In: Turner ME, editor. Groups at work: advances in theory and research. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 2001. p. 25–65.

    Google Scholar 

  127. van Knippenberg D, Hogg MA. Social identity processes in organizations. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2001;4(3):185–9.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Jowett S, Poczwardowski A. Understanding the coach–athlete relationship. In: Jowett S, Lavallee D, editors. Social psychology in sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2007. p. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Elberse A, Ferguson A. Ferguson’s formula. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91(10):116–25.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Barrett M. Curling: The new leadership model. 2014. http://www.astd.org/Publications/Blogs/Management-Blog/2014/07/Curling-New-Leadership-Model. Retrieved 2014.

  131. Manz CC, Pearce CL, Mott JW, et al. Don’t take the lead…share the lead: surprising leadership lessons from big time college sports. Organ Dyn. 2013;42(1):54–60. doi:10.1016/J.Orgdyn.2012.12.007.

  132. Amorose AJ. Coaching effectiveness: exploring the relationship between coaching behavior and self-determined motivation. In: Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2007. p. 209–27.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Amorose AJ, Anderson-Butcher D. Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: a test of self-determination theory. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2007;8(5):654–70. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2006.11.003.

  134. Horn TS. Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In: Horn TS, editor. Advances in sport psychology. 3rd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2008. p. 239–67.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Price MS, Weiss MR. Relationships among coach burnout, coach behaviors, and athletes’ psychological responses. Sport Psychol. 2000;14(4):391–409.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Leadership Chelladurai P. In: Singer RN, Murphey M, Tennant LK, editors. Handbook of research on sport psychology. New York: Macmillan; 1993. p. 647–71.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Smoll FL, Smith RE. Leadership behaviors in sport: a theoretical model and research paradigm. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1989;19(18):1522–51. doi:10.1111/J.1559-1816.1989.Tb01462.X.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Bass BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Bass BM, Riggio RE. Transformational leadership. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Arthur CA, Woodman T, Ong CW, et al. The role of athlete narcissism in moderating the relationship between coaches’ transformational leader behaviors and athlete motivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;33(1):3–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Charbonneau D, Barling J, Kelloway EK. Transformational leadership and sports performance: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2001;31(7):1521–34. doi:10.1111/J.1559-1816.2001.Tb02686.X.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Rowold J. Transformational and transactional leadership in martial arts. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2006;18(4):312–25. doi:10.1080/10413200600944082.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Price MS, Weiss MR. Relationships among coach leadership, peer leadership, and adolescent athletes’ psychosocial and team outcomes: a test of transformational leadership theory. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2013;25(2):265–79. doi:10.1080/10413200.2012.725703.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Conger JA. The charismatic leader. Behind the mystique of exceptional leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  145. van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB. A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: back to the drawing board? Acad Manag Ann. 2013;7(1):1–60. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.759433.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Carlyle T. Heroes and hero worship. London: Harrap; 1840.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Marturano A, Arsenault P. Charisma. In: Marturano A, Gosling J, editors. Leadership: the key concepts. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Turner JC. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell Publishers; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Slater MJ, Coffee P, Barker JB, et al. Promoting shared meanings in group memberships: a social identity approach to leadership in sport. Reflect Pract Int Multidiscipl Perspect. 2014;15(5):672–85. doi:10.1080/14623943.2014.944126.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Slater MJ, Barker JB, Coffee P, et al. Leading for gold: social identity leadership processes at the London 2012 Olympic Games. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2014. doi:10.1080/2159676x.2014.936030.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Platow MJ, van Knippenberg D, Haslam SA, et al. A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: considering leader charisma from a self-categorization perspective. Br J Soc Psychol. 2006;45:303–20. doi:10.1348/014466605x41986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Reicher SD. Up close and personal: evidence that shared social identity is a basis for the ‘special’ relationship that binds followers to leaders. Leadersh Q. 2013;25(2):296–313. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.008.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Giessner SR, van Knippenberg D. “License to Fail”: goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2008;105(1):14–35. doi:10.1016/J.Obhdp.2007.04.002.

  154. Platow MJ, van Knippenberg D. A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: the effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27(11):1508–19. doi:10.1177/01461672012711011.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Haslam SA, McGarty C, Brown PM, et al. Inspecting the emperor’s clothes: evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance. Group Dyn. 1998;2(3):168–84. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.2.3.168.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Charlesworth R. The coach: managing for success. Sydney: Pan MacMillan; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Fransen AF, Coffee P, Vanbeselaere N, et al. The impact of athlete leaders on team members’ team outcome confidence: a test of mediation by team identification and collective efficacy. Sport Psychol. 2014. doi:10.1123/tsp.2013-0141.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Sutton WA, McDonald MA, Milne GR, Cimperman J. Creating and fostering fan identification in professional sports. Sport Market Q. 1997;6:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Boen F, Vanbeselaere N, Pandelaere M, et al. When your team is not really your team anymore: identification with a merged basketball club. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2008;20(2):165–83. doi:10.1080/10413200701805711.

    Google Scholar 

  160. De Backer M, Boen F, Ceux T, et al. Do perceived justice and need support of the coach predict team identification and cohesion? Testing their relative importance among top volleyball and handball players in Belgium and Norway. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011;12(2):192–201. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2010.09.009.

  161. Zucchermaglio C. Who wins and who loses: the rhetorical manipulation of social identities in a soccer team. Group Dyn. 2005;9(4):219–38. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.4.219.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Zucchermaglio C, Alby F. Identity in sport teams. Psychol Aging. 2011;2(3):202–9. doi:10.4236/psych.2011.23031.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Brewer BW. Self-identity and specific vulnerability to depressed mood. J Pers. 1993;61(3):343–64. doi:10.1111/J.1467-6494.1993.Tb00284.X.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Brewer BW, Cornelius AE, Stephan Y, et al. Self-protective changes in athletic identity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11(1):1–5. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2009.09.005.

  165. Brown TN, Jackson JS, Brown KT, et al. ‘‘There’s no race on the playing field’’: perceptions of racial discrimination among white and black athletes. J Sport Soc Issues. 2003;27(2):162–83. doi:10.1177/0193732502250715.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Grove JR, Fish M, Eklund RC. Changes in athletic identity following team selection: self-protection versus self-enhancement. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2004;16(1):75–81. doi:10.1080/10413200490260062.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Mitchell TO, Nesti M, Richardson D, et al. Exploring athletic identity in elite-level English youth football: a cross-sectional approach. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(13):1294–9. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.898855.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Martin JJ, Smith KL, Adamsmushett C. Athletic identity and sport orientation of adolescent swimmers with disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 1995;12(2):113–23.

    Google Scholar 

  169. Martin JJ, Eklund RC, Mushett CA. Factor structure of the athletic identity measurement scale with athletes with disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 1997;14(1):74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Cabrita TM, Rosado AB, Leite TO, et al. The relationship between athletic identity and career decisions in athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2014;26(4):471–81. doi:10.1080/10413200.2014.931312.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Strachan SM, Brawley LR. Reactions to a perceived challenge to identity: a focus on exercise and healthy eating. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(5):575–88. doi:10.1177/1359105308090930.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Strachan SM, Brawley LR, Spink KS, et al. Strength of exercise identity and identity-exercise consistency affective and social cognitive relationships. J Health Psychol. 2009;14(8):1196–206. doi:10.1177/1359105309346340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Strachan SM, Shields CA, Glassford A, Beatty J. Role and group identity and adjustment to the possibility of running group disbandment. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13(4):436–43. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2012.01.007.

  174. Dunlop WL, Beauchamp MR. Does similarity make a difference? Predicting cohesion and attendance behaviors within exercise group settings. Group Dyn. 2011;15(3):258–66. doi:10.1037/A0023642.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Berger J, Rand L. Shifting signals to help health: using identity signaling to reduce risky health behaviors. J Consum Res. 2008;35(3):509–18. doi:10.1086/587632.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Krane V, Barber H, McClung LR. Social psychological benefits of gay games participation: a social identity theory explanation. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2002;14(1):27–42. doi:10.1080/104132002753403816.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Galli N, Vealey RS. “Bouncing Back” from adversity: athletes’ experiences of resilience. Sport Psychol. 2008;22(3):316–35.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Morgan PBC, Fletcher D, Sarkar M. Defining and characterizing team resilience in elite sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013;14(4):549–59. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2013.01.004.

  179. Jones JM, Jetten J. Recovering from strain and enduring pain: multiple group memberships promote resilience in the face of physical challenges. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2011;2(3):239–44. doi:10.1177/1948550610386806.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Coffee P, Rees T, Haslam SA. Bouncing back from failure: the interactive impact of perceived controllability and stability on self-efficacy beliefs and future task performance. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(11):1117–24. doi:10.1080/02640410903030297.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Rees T, Salvatore J, Coffee P, et al. Reversing downward performance spirals. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;49(3):400–3. doi:10.1016/J.Jesp.2012.12.013.

  182. Haslam C, Holme A, Haslam SA, et al. Maintaining group memberships: social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(5–6):671–91. doi:10.1080/09602010701643449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Haslam SA, Jetten J, Postmes T, et al. Social identity, health and well-being: an emerging agenda for applied psychology. Appl Psychol: Int Rev. 2009;58(1):1–23. doi:10.1111/J.1464-0597.2008.00379.X.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Podlog L, Eklund RC. The psychosocial aspects of a return to sport following serious injury: a review of the literature from a self-determination perspective. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2007;8(4):535–66. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2006.07.008.

  185. Goodger K, Gorely T, Lavallee D, et al. Burnout in sport: a systematic review. Sport Psychol. 2007;21(2):127–51.

    Google Scholar 

  186. Park S, Lavallee D, Tod D. Athletes’ career transition out of sport: a systematic review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;6(1):22–53. doi:10.1080/1750984x.2012.687053.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Rees T, Ingledew DK, Hardy L. Attribution in sport psychology: seeking congruence between theory, research and practice. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2005;6(2):189–204. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2003.10.008.

  188. Rejeski WJ. A model of attributional conflict in sport. J Sport Behav. 1979;2:156–66.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Manley AJ, Greenlees I, Graydon J, et al. Athletes’ perceived use of information sources when forming initial impressions and expectancies of a coach: an explorative study. Sport Psychol. 2008;22(1):73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  190. Moll T, Jordet G, Pepping GJ. Emotional contagion in soccer penalty shootouts: celebration of individual success is associated with ultimate team success. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(9):983–92. doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.484068.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Jones MV, Coffee P, Sheffield D, et al. Just a game? Changes in English and Spanish soccer fans’ emotions in the 2010 World Cup. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13(2):162–9. doi:10.1016/J.Psychsport.2011.10.008.

  192. Bruner MW, Boardley ID, Côté J. Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2014;15(1):56–64. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.003.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Cikara M, Botvinick MM, Fiske ST. Us versus them: social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychol Sci. 2011. doi:10.1177/0956797610397667.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  194. Ostrowsky MK. The social psychology of alcohol use and violent behavior among sports spectators. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19(4):303–10. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.001.

    Google Scholar 

  195. Sønderlund AL, O’Brien K, Kremer P, et al. The association between sports participation, alcohol use and aggression and violence: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(1):2–7. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.03.011.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Stott C, Hutchison P, Drury J. ‘Hooligans’ abroad? Inter-group dynamics, social identity and participation in collective ‘disorder’ at the 1998 World Cup Finals. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:359–84. doi:10.1348/014466601164876.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Stott C, Reicher S. How conflict escalates: the inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd ‘violence’. Sociology. 1998;32(2):353–77. doi:10.1177/0038038598032002007.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Stott C, Adang O, Livingstone A, et al. Variability in the collective behaviour of England fans at Euro 2004: ‘Hooliganism’, public order policing and social change. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2007;37(1):75–100. doi:10.1002/Ejsp.338.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Cowan S. Chris Nilan continues fight against bullying as schools open. 2012. http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/2012/09/06/chris-nilan-continues-fight-against-bullying-as-schools-open/. Retrieved 2014.

  200. Bass J, Newman JI. Too big to fail: the Penn State scandal and the crisis of the corporate university. J Issues Intercoll Athl. 2013(Special Issue):22–40.

  201. Wann DL, Branscombe NR. Person perception when aggressive or nonaggressive sports are primed. Aggress Behav. 1990;16(1):27–32. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1990)16:1<27:Aid-Ab2480160104>3.0.Co;2-L.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Lanter JR. Spectator identification with the team and participation in celebratory violence. J Sport Behav. 2011;34:268–80.

    Google Scholar 

  203. Lanter JR. “But it’s Joe Pa!” The effects of social identification on sport fan perceptions of the Penn State Case. J Issues Intercoll Athl. 2013(Special Issue):58–69.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tim Rees, S. Alexander Haslam, Pete Coffee, and David Lavallee have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of the manuscript. The contribution of S. Alexander Haslam was funded by the Australian Research Council (FL110100199). The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Rees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rees, T., Alexander Haslam, S., Coffee, P. et al. A Social Identity Approach to Sport Psychology: Principles, Practice, and Prospects. Sports Med 45, 1083–1096 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0345-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0345-4

Keywords

Navigation