Skip to main content
Log in

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the acceptability, validity, and reliability of the EuroQoL Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) health utility measures in patients with symptomatic benign thyroid nodules.

Methods

Data from a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02398721) of 294 patients with symptomatic benign thyroid nodules were utilized for this psychometric evaluation of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measurement. Three HR-QOL questionnaires—the generic 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2), EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6D—were interviewer-administered at baseline and 2 weeks afterwards. Responses to SF-6D were transformed to SF-6D utility scores using a Hong Kong population scoring algorithm derived by standard gamble, whereas responses to EQ-5D-5L were mapped onto EQ-5D-3L response via interim mapping algorithms and then converted to EQ-5D-5L utility scores using a Chinese-specific value set. Construct validity was determined by evaluating Spearman correlation between SF-12v2 scores and utility scores. Two-week test–retest reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient.

Results

No significant (>15%) floor and ceiling effects were observed for SF-6D utility scores. The SF-6D utility scores had a moderate Spearman rank correlation with the SF-12v2 domain score providing evidence for adequate construct validity. The SF-6D utility scores showed good test–retest reliability (0.794; range 0.696–0.860). Better reliability was observed in SF-6D utility scores than in EQ-5D-5L utility scores.

Conclusions

While the EQ-5D-5L instrument was less reproducible, the SF-6D instrument appeared to be an applicable, valid, and reliable measure in assessing the HR-QOL of Chinese patients with symptomatic benign thyroid nodules. The impact of utility score selection on the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of clinical interventions targeted to these patients needs further exploration.

Clinical trial number and registry

NCT02398721, ClinicalTrials.gov.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, Duick DS, Harrell RM, Hegedüs L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules—2016 Update. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(5):622–39. doi:10.4158/EP161208.GL.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Che Y, Jin S, Shi C, Wang L, Zhang X, Li Y, et al. Treatment of benign thyroid nodules: comparison of surgery with radiofrequency ablation. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(7):1321–5. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Valcavi R, Tsamatropoulos P. Health-related quality of life after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of cold, solid, benign thyroid nodules: a 2-year follow-up study in 40 patients. Endocr Pract. 2015;21(8):887–96. doi:10.4158/ep15676.or.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spiezia S, Garberoglio R, Milone F, Ramundo V, Caiazzo C, Assanti AP, et al. Thyroid nodules and related symptoms are stably controlled two years after radiofrequency thermal ablation. Thyroid. 2009;19(3):219–25. doi:10.1089/thy.2008.0202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yue W-W, Li X-L, Xu H-X, Lu F, Sun L-P, Guo L-H, et al. Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation versus open surgery for benign thyroid nodules: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37838. doi:10.1038/srep37838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan C-W, Sun H-P, Zhou H-J, Ma Q, Xu Y, Luo N, et al. Valuing health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes patients in China. Med Decis Mak. 2016;36(2):234–41. doi:10.1177/0272989x15606903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan C-W, Sun H-P, Wang X, Ma Q, Xu Y, Luo N, et al. The EQ-5D-5L index score is more discriminative than the EQ-5D-3L index score in diabetes patients. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(7):1767–74. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0902-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung PHW, Wong CKH, Samartzis D, Luk KKD, Lam CLK, Cheung KMC, et al. Psychometric validation of the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) in Chinese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016;11(1):19. doi:10.1186/s13013-016-0083-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng Y-S, Kohlmann T, Busschbach J, Golicki D, et al. Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012;15(5):708–15. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu GG, Wu H, Li M, Gao C, Luo N. Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Value Health. 2014;17(5):597–604. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42(9):851–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong CKH, Lam ETP, Lam CLK. Comparison of direct-measured and derived short form six dimensions (SF-6D) health preference values among chronic hepatitis B patients. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2973–81. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0403-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lam CLK, Brazier J, McGhee SM. Valuation of the SF-6D health states is feasible, acceptable, reliable, and valid in a Chinese population. Value Health. 2008;11(2):295–303. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00233.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McGhee SM, Brazier J, Lam CL, Wong LC, Chau J, Cheung A, et al. Quality-adjusted life years: population-specific measurement of the quality component. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17(Suppl 6):17–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–8. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(5):403–8. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(89)90128-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M, Jones D. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials: a review. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):1–74. doi:10.3310/hta2140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70(4):213–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(8):730–5. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00084-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong CKH, Lang BHH, Lam CLK. A systematic review of quality of thyroid-specific health-related quality-of-life instruments recommends ThyPRO for patients with benign thyroid diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;78:63–72. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watt T, Barbesino G, Bjorner JB, Bonnema SJ, Bukvic B, Drummond R, et al. Cross-cultural validity of the thyroid-specific quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measure, ThyPRO. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(3):769–80. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0798-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam CLK, Tse EYY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005;14(2):539–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contribution

CKHW wrote the manuscript, researched data, and contributed to statistical analysis and interpretation of results. BHHL contributed to the study design, acquisition of data and reviewed/edited the manuscript. HMSY contributed to the acquisition of data and reviewed/edited the manuscript. CLKL reviewed/edited the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Carlos K. H. Wong or Brian H. H. Lang.

Ethics declarations

Financial support for this study was provided by the Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF#12132941) of the Food and Health Bureau, HKSAR. The funding agreement ensured the authors independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report.

Conflict of interest

Carlos K.H. Wong, Brian H.H. Lang, Hill M.S. Yu, and Cindy L.K. Lam declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, C.K.H., Lang, B.H.H., Yu, H.M.S. et al. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation. Patient 10, 447–454 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0220-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0220-5

Navigation