Skip to main content
Log in

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) Can Be Applicable to Chinese Males and Females with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim and Objectives

The aim of this study was to extend the scope of application of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) with the objective of assessing the applicability, validity, reliability and sensitivity of the IIQ-7 in both Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Methods

The validity, reliability and sensitivity were assessed in 233 patients who were recruited in Hong Kong primary-care settings. The internal construct validity was assessed by corrected item–total correlation. The convergent validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation test against International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) quality-of-life question and Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2). The reliability was assessed by the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient) and 2-week test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient and paired t test). The sensitivity was determined by performing known group comparisons by independent t test.

Results

Corrected item–total correlations were ≥0.4 for all items in males and females. Overall, the IIQ-7 total score had a stronger correlation with IPSS quality-of-life score than the SF-12v2. The IIQ-7 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient >0.7) and good test–retest reliability (ICC > 0.8, paired t test p value >0.05). The IIQ-7 was more sensitive than the SF-12v2 to detect differences among patients with different levels of symptom severity.

Conclusions

The IIQ-7 Chinese version appears to be a valid and reliable measure to assess Cantonese-speaking males and females with LUTS. The IIQ-7 is more sensitive than generic health-related quality-of-life measures to detect differences between groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Thompson CL, Milsom I, Irwin D, Kopp ZS, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU Int. 2009;104(3):352–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Agatep B, Milsom I, Abrams P. Worldwide prevalence estimates of lower urinary tract symptoms, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence and bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1132–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coyne KS, Wein AJ, Tubaro A, Sexton CC, Thompson CL, Kopp ZS, et al. The burden of lower urinary tract symptoms: evaluating the effect of LUTS on health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009;103(Suppl 3):4–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Irwin DE, Kopp ZS, Kelleher CJ, Milsom I. The impact of overactive bladder, incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life, work productivity, sexuality and emotional well-being in men and women: results from the EPIC study. BJU Int. 2008;101(11):1388–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Das AK, Carlson AM, Hull M, Group USM-S. Improvement in depression and health-related quality of life after sacral nerve stimulation therapy for treatment of voiding dysfunction. Urology. 2004;64(1):62–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Asplund R. Nocturia, nocturnal polyuria, and sleep quality in the elderly. J Psychosomatic Res. 2004;56(5):517–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wein AJ, Coyne KS, Tubaro A, Sexton CC, Kopp ZS, Aiyer LP. The impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on male sexual health: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009;103(Suppl 3):33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glover L, Gannon K, McLoughlin J, Emberton M. Men’s experiences of having lower urinary tract symptoms: factors relating to bother. BJU Int. 2004;94(4):563–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fultz NH, Fisher GG, Jenkins KR. Does urinary incontinence affect middle-aged and older women’s time use and activity patterns? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(6):1327–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hennessy CH, Moriarty DG, Zack MM, Scherr PA, Brackbill R. Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance. Public Health Rep. 1994;109(5):665–72.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 1994;3(5):291–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gotoh M. Quality of life assessment for patients with urinary incontinence. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2007;69(3–4):123–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol urodyn. 1995;14(2):131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Franzen K, Johansson JE, Karlsson J, Nilsson K. Validation of the Swedish version of the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(5):555–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruiz de Vinaspre Hernandez R, Tomas Aznar C, Rubio Aranda E. Validation of the Spanish version of the short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in pregnant women. Gaceta Sanit SESPAS. 2011;25(5):379–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu L, Yu SJ, Lang JH, Xu T, Lu YX, Yang X, et al. Validation of incontinence impact questionnaire short form in Chinese population. Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi. 2011;46(7):505–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan SS, Choy KW, Lee BP, Pang SM, Yip SK, Lee LL, et al. Chinese validation of Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(7):807–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Azab AS, Mascha EJ. Arabic validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and Adapted Incontinence Impact Questionnaires—short forms. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(1):33–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Cam M, Karateke A. Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Utomo E, Korfage IJ, Wildhagen MF, Steensma AB, Bangma CH, Blok BFM. Validation of the urogenital distress inventory (UDI‐6) and incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ‐7) in a Dutch population. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2013 (in press).

  21. Walton L, Brown D, Rahman M, Nuri R. Reliability and validity of Bengali language SF-36 and IIG-7 for utilization in postpartum Bangladeshi women. J Indian Physiother Occup Ther. 2012;6(1):51–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moore KN, Jensen L. Testing of the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) with men after radical prostatectomy. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2000;27(6):304–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sexton CC, Coyne KS, Kopp ZS, Irwin DE, Milsom I, Aiyer LP, et al. The overlap of storage, voiding and postmicturition symptoms and implications for treatment seeking in the USA, UK and Sweden: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009;103(Suppl 3):12–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O’Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol. 1992;148(5):1549–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi EP, Lam CL, Chin WY. Validation of the International Prostate Symptom Score in Chinese males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lam C, Wong C, Lam E, Lo Y, Huang W. Population norm of Chinese (HK) SF-12 health survey-version 2 of Chinese adults in Hong Kong. 2010. Hong Kong Pract. 2010;32(2):77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Manual Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):945–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Harvey MA, Kristjansson B, Griffith D, Versi E. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory: a revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(1):25–31. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.116369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):S217–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Badia X, Garcia-Losa M, Dal-Re R, Carballido J, Serra M. Validation of a harmonized Spanish version of the IPSS: evidence of equivalence with the original American scale. International Prostate Symptom Score. Urology. 1998;52(4):614–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gannon K, Glover L, O’Neill M, Emberton M. Men and chronic illness: a qualitative study of LUTS. J Health Psychol. 2004;9(3):411–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Small Project Fund, the University of Hong Kong and the Health and Health Services Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, HKSAR commissioned Research on Enhancing Primary Care Study. The authors would like to thank Dr. Symphorosa S. C. Chan for permission to use the Chinese IIQ-7. EPHC was responsible for study design, acquisition of data, data analysis and drafting of the manuscript. WYC and CLKL were involved in the planning of the study design, for study supervision, for critical revision of the manuscript and for obtaining the study’s funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

We declare there are no conflicts of interest specific to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmond P. H. Choi.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Screening questionnaire

  1. 1.

    How often do you have urinary problems*?

  2. 2.

    We would like to know how much urine you think leaks.

    How much urine do you usually leak (whether you wear protection or not)?

  3. 3.

    Overall, how much do urinary problems* interfere with your everyday life?

*Urinary problems: intermittent stream, incomplete bladder emptying, weak stream, straining, nocturia, urgency, frequency and incontinence.

Appendix 2: IIQ-7 (modified)

Have urine problems* affected your:

  1. 1.

    Ability to do household chores (cooking, housecleaning, laundry)?

  2. 2.

    Physical recreation such as walking, swimming, or other exercise?

  3. 3.

    Entertainment activities (movies, concerts, etc.)?

  4. 4.

    Ability to travel by car or bus more than 30 min from home?

  5. 5.

    Participation in social activities outside your home?

  6. 6.

    Emotional health (nervousness, depression, etc.)?

  7. 7.

    Feeling frustrated?

Urinary problems: intermittent stream, incomplete bladder emptying, weak stream, straining, nocturia, urgency, frequency and incontinence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, E.P.H., Lam, C.L.K. & Chin, WY. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7) Can Be Applicable to Chinese Males and Females with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Patient 7, 403–411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0062-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0062-3

Keywords

Navigation