Skip to main content
Log in

We Propose a Novel Measure for Social Welfare and Public Health: Capability-Adjusted Life-Years, CALYs

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rosén M, Lindholm L. The neglected effects of lifestyle interventions in cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Promot Int. 1992;7:163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weatherly H, Drummond M, Claxton K, et al. Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy. 2009;93:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurley J. An overview of the normative economics in the health sector. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, editors. Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000. p. 55–118.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sen A. Rational fools. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1977;6(4):317–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sen A. Capabilities and commodities. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nussbaum M. Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Cookson R. QALYs and the capability approach. Health Econ. 2005;14:817–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. EuroQol Group. http://www.euroqol.org/. Accessed 29 Mar 2017.

  9. Brouwer W, Culyer A, van Exel J, Rutten F. Welfarism vs extra-welfarism. J Health Econ. 2008;27:325–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:167–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, Coast J. Scoring the Icecap-a capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015;24(3):258–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell M, Roberts T, Barton P, Coast J. Assessing sufficient capability: a new approach to economic evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2015;139:71–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. SOU. Får vi det bättre? Om mått på livskvalitet. [Are we better off? On measures of quality of life]. Swedish Governmental Public Investigations. 2015;56.

  14. Daniels N. Just health: meeting health needs fairly. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sen A. Development as freedom. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Forte [Swedish Research Council for Health, Working life and Welfare]. Är en bättre folkhälsa värd sitt pris? - En hälsoekonomisk utvärdering av ökad bemanning inom hemtjänsten [Is improved public health worth its costs? A health economic evaluation of increased staffing in home care]. Research grant, No 2015-00647. 2015.

  18. Coast J, Kinghorn P, Mitchell P. The development of capability measures in health economics: opportunities, challenges and progress. Patient. 2015;8:119–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Månsdotter A, Ekman B, Feldman I, Hagberg L, Hurtig A-K, Lindholm L. Towards capability-adjusted life-years (CALYs) in public health and social welfare: results from a pilot study on ranking capabilities. 2017 (in preparation).

  20. Salomon JA, Vos T, Hogan DR, et al. Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2129–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burström K, Sun S, Gerdtham U, Henriksson M, Johannesson M, Levin L-Å, Zethraeus N. Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(2):431–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams A. Intergeneration equity: an exploration of the “fair innings” argument. Health Econ. 1997;6:117–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Culyer A. Cost-effectiveness thresholds in health care: a bookshelf guide to their meaning and use. Health Econ Policy Law. 2016;11:415–32. doi:10.1017/S1744133116000049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lorgelly P, Lorimer K, Fenwick E, Briggs A, Anand P. Operationalising the capability approach as an outcome measure in public health: the development of the OCAP-18. Soc Sci Med. 2015;142:68–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Drummond MF, Schulper M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lindholm L. Goda år—ett nytt mått för utvärdering av välfärdsinsatser. [Good years—a novel measure for evaluating welfare policies]. Application to the Umeå Board for Ethical Clearance (EPN), Protocol No 2017/57-31.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Månsdotter.

Ethics declarations

This commentary was funded by a network grant, to the Swedish Research Network for Economic Analysis of Public Health, from the Research Council for Health, Working life, and Welfare (No 2014-1452).

All authors, i.e. Anna Månsdotter, Björn Ekman, Inna Feldman, Lars Hagberg, Anna-Karin Hurtig, and Lars Lindholm, declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

The Umeå Board for Ethical Clearance (EPN) have approved to the survey among individuals in the general public (n = 967) from an ethical point of view (Protocol No 2016-68-31M).

The Stockholm Board for Ethical Clearance (EPN) have in an advisory statement concluded that they have no ethical objections to survey among researchers in public health and social sciences (Protocol No 2016/4).

The Umeå Board for Ethical Clearance (EPN) have approved to the pilot study among individuals in the general public (n = 3000) from an ethical point of view (Protocol No 2017/57-31).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Månsdotter, A., Ekman, B., Feldman, I. et al. We Propose a Novel Measure for Social Welfare and Public Health: Capability-Adjusted Life-Years, CALYs. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 15, 437–440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0323-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0323-0

Keywords

Navigation