Skip to main content
Log in

Beating the odds: an approach to the topic of resilience in children and adolescents

Den Umständen trotzen – eine Annäherung an das Thema Resilienz im Kindes- und Jugendalter

  • review
  • Published:
neuropsychiatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The concept of good mental functioning despite negative influences first arose more than a hundred years ago and has received increasing interest during the last decades. For a long time, lack of unified definition of concept and terms rendered research difficult to compare. Nowadays, consent is reached on a definition of resilience as “an individual’s ability to properly adapt to stress and adversity” and a large number of studies have been performed trying to identify factors that render children resilient. Among these, interpersonal factors like gender, intelligence, aspects of character and temperament as well as genes; factors within the family like a stable and positive relation to an adult; and factors of the broader environment like being integrated into the community have been those most articulately pointed out by research. Although, to date, research on resilience has been extensive, there is still a lack of robust, comparative, empirical studies allowing policy formulation for fostering resilience in children at risk.

Zusammenfassung

Das Konzept von psychischer Stabilität trotz widriger Umstände, welches vor mehr als hundert Jahren erstmals entstand, hat vor allem während der letzten Jahrzehnte zunehmend an Beachtung gewonnen. Das Fehlen einer einheitlichen Definition des Konzeptes an sich sowie der jeweiligen Begrifflichkeiten machte es jedoch über lange Zeit schwierig, Forschungsergebnisse zu vergleichen. Heute wird Resilienz als „die Fähigkeit eines Individuums, Krisen durch Rückgriff auf persönliche Ressourcen zu meistern“ definiert und in vielen Studien wurde und wird versucht, Faktoren, welche Resilienz bei Kindern fördern, zu identifizieren. Hierbei stellten sich persönliche Faktoren wie Geschlecht, Intelligenz, bestimmte Züge von Charakter und Temperament, Aspekte innerhalb der Familie wie etwa eine positive, stabile Beziehung zu einem Erwachsenen sowie Faktoren des Umfeldes wie das Eingebunden sein in eine Gemeinschaft als am stärksten wirksam heraus. Wenngleich es bis heute unzählige Untersuchungen zum Thema Resilienz gibt, fehlt es dennoch noch immer an robusten, vergleichbaren, empirischen Studien als Grundlage für Strategien zur Stärkung der Resilienz bei gefährdeten Kindern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dilling H, Mombour W, Schmidt M, Schulte-Markwort E. Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. ICD-10. Bern: Hans Huber; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lösel F, Bender D. Von generellen Schutzfaktoren zu spezifischen protektiven Prozessen: Konzeptuelle Grundlagen und Ergebnisse der Resilienzorschung. In: Opp G, Fingerle M, editors. Erziehung zwischen Risiko und Resilienz. Ernst Reinhardt Verlag; 2007. S. 57–78.

  3. Rossi A. Some pre-world War II antecedents of community mental health theory and practice. Mental Hygiene. 1962;46:78–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Separation. New York: Basic Books; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Vol. 3: Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ainsworth MDS. Attachment: retrospect and prospect. In: Parkes CM, Stevenson-Hinde J, editors. The place of attachment in human behavior. New York: Basic Books; 1982. pp. 3–30.

  8. Huppert FA. Positive mental health in individuals and populations. In: Huppert F, Baylis N, Keverne B, editors. The Science of Well-being. Oxford University Press; 2005. pp. 307–40.

  9. Linley PA, Joseph S. Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken NJ; John Wiley and sons, 2004.

  10. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 2000;71:543–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutter M. Resilience reconsidered: conceptual considerations, empirical findings, and policy implications. In: Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ, editors. Handbook of early childhood intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. pp. 651–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Welter-Enderlin R. Einleitung: Resilienz aus der Sicht von Beratung und Therapie. In: Welter- Enderlin R, Hildenbrand B, editors. Resilienz—Gedeihen trotz widriger Umstände. Heidelberg: Carl Auer-Systeme Verlag und Verlagsbuchhandlung; 2006. pp. 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy LB and associates. Coping vulnerability, and resilience in childhood. In: Coelho GV. Hamburg, DA;Adams JE (Eds). New York basic books, 1974.

  14. Werner E, Smith RS. Overcoming the Odds. High Risk Children from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Cornell University; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scheithauer H, Petermann F, Niebank K. Frühkindliche Entwicklung und Entwicklungsrisiken. In: Petermann F, Niebank K, Scheithauer H, editors. Risiken in der frühkindlichen Entwicklung: Entwicklungspsychopathologie der ersten Lebensjahre. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000. pp. 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sroufe LA, Egeland B, Calson EA, Collins WA. The development of the person. The Minnesaota Study of risk and adaption from birth to adulthood. New York: The Guilford Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garmezy N. Resilience in children’s adaptation to negative life events and stressed environments. Pediatr Ann. 1991;20(9):463–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Egeland B, Carlson E, Sroufe AL. Resilience as process. Dev Psychopathol. 1993;5:517–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D. The construct of resilience: implications for interventions and social policies. Dev Psychopathol. 2000;12:857–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutter M. Psychological adversity: risk, resilience and recovery. In: Richman JM, Fraser MW, editors. The context of youth violence: resilience, risk, and protection. Westport: Praeger Publishers; 2001. pp. 13–41.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rutter M. Environmentally mediated risks and psychopathology: research strategies and findings. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005;44(1):3–18.

  22. Rutter M. Developing concepts in developmental psychopathology. In: Hudziak JJ editor. Developmental psychopathology and wellness: Genetic and environmental influences. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2008. pp. 3–22

  23. Opp G, Fingerle M. Was Kinder stärkt—Erziehung zwischen Risiko und Resilienz. 2. edn. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag; 2007.

  24. Ungar M. Putting resilience theory into action: five principles for Intervention. In: Liebenberg L, Ungar M. Resilience in action—working with youth across cultures and contexts. University of Toronto Press; 2008. pp. 17–36.

  25. Masten AS. Resilience comes of age: reflections on the past and outlook for the next generation of research. In: Glantz MD, Johnson JL, editors. Resilience and development: positive life adaptions. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 281–96.

  26. Masten AS, Coatsworth JD. The development of competence in favourable and unfavourable environments: lessons from research on successful children. Am Psychol. 1998;53(2):205–20.

  27. Masten AS, Reed M. Resilience in development. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. The handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. pp. 74–88.

  28. Scheithauer H, Petermann F. Zur Wirkungsweise von Risiko- und Schutzfaktoren in der Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Kindheit und Entwicklung. 1999;(8):3–14.

  29. Laucht M, Schmidt MH, Esser G. Risko. Und Schutzfaktoren in der Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Frühförderung interdisziplinär. 2000;19(3):97–108.

  30. Laucht M. Risiko- vs. Schutzfaktor? Kritische Anmerkungen zu einer problematischen Dichotomie. In: Opp G, Fingerle M (Eds). Was Kinder stärkt: Erziehung zwischen Risiko und Resilienz. München, 2. Auflage: Ernst Reinhardt. pp. 304–14.

  31. Nitsch JR, editor. Streß: Theorien, Untersuchungen, Maßnahmen. Bern: Huber; 1999. pp. 213–59.

  32. www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/protective. Accessed: 22. July 2014.

  33. Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: past, present and future. Psycosom Med. 1993;55(3):234–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pfefferbaum B, Mary JD, Noffsinger MA, Wind LH. Issues in the assessment of children’s coping in the context of mass trauma. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(3):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wustmann C. Resilienz-Widerstandsfähigkeit von Kindern in Tageseinrichtungen fördern. 2. Edn. Cornelsen Verlag Scriptor; 2009.

  36. Werner E. Entwicklung zwischen Risiko und Resilienz. In: Opp G, Fingerle M, editors. Was Kinder stärkt. Erziehung zwischen Risiko und Resilienz. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag; 2007. pp. 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Werner E. The Children of Kauai. A longitudinal study from the prenatal period to age ten. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press; 1977.

  38. Werner E, Smith RS. Vulnerable but invincible: a longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Werner E. Vulnerable but invincible: high risk children from birth to adulthood. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1996;5(1 Suppl.):47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Werner E, Smith RS. Journeys from childhood to midlife: risk, resilience and recovery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Werner E. Wenn Menschen trotz widriger Umstände gedeihen—und was man daraus lernen kann. In: Welter-Enderlin R, Hildenbrand B, editors. Resilienz—Gedeihen trotz widriger Umstände. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag und Verlagsbuchhandlung, GmbH; 2006. pp. 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lemery-Chalfant K. How genes and environments work together to promote resilience. In: Reich J, Zautra AJ, Hal JS, editors. Handbook of adult resilience. New York: Guilford; 2010. pp. 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lemery-Chalfant K, Clifford S, McDonald K, O’Brien TC, Valiente C. Arizona twin project: a focus on early resilience. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013;16(1):404–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McKee L, Roland E, Coffelt N, Olson AL, Forehand R, Massari C, Zens MS. Harsh discipline and child problem behaviors: the role of positive parenting and gender. J Fam Violence. 2007;22:187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Masten AS, Best KM, Garmezy N. Resilience and development: contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Dev Psychopathol. 1990;2:425–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Masten AS, Obradovic J. Competence and resilience in development. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1094:13–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Masten AS. Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):227–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. de Anda D, Baroni S, Boskin L, Buchwald L, Morgan J, Ow J, Weiss R. Stress, stressors and coping among high school students. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2000;22:441–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wyman PA. Emerging perspectives on context spec-ificity of children’s adaptation and resilience: evidence from a decade of research with urban children in adversity. In: Luthar SS editor. Resilience and vulnerability: adaptation in the context of childhood adversities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. pp. 293–317.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Chess S. Defying the voice of doom. In: Dugan T, Coles R, editors. The child in our times. New York: Brunner Mazel; 1989. pp. 179–99.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang MC, Haertel GD, Walberg HJ. Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Rev Educ Res. 1993;63(3):249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. La Greca AM, Silverman WK, Vernberg EM, Prinstein MJ. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress in children after Hurrican Andrew. A prospective study. J Consul Clin Psychol. 1996;64(4):712–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Benard B. Fostering resiliency in kid: protective factors in the family, school and community. Portland: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Afifi T, Macmillan HL. Resilience following child maltreatment: a review of protective factors. Can J Psychiatry. 2011;56(5):266–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Van Hagen C, Röper G. Resilienz und Ressourcenorientierung—Eine Bestandsaufnahme. In: Fooken I, Jürgen Zinnecker J, editors. Trauma und Resilienz—Chancen und Risiken lebensgeschichtlicher Bewältigung von belasteten Kindheiten. Weinheim: Juventa Verlag; 2007. pp. 15-28.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pearlin LI, Menaghan EG, Lieberman MA, Mullan JT. The stress process. J Health Social Behaviour. 1981;22:337–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Campbell-Sill L, Cohan SL, Stein MB. Relation-ship of resilience to personality, coping and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44:585–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five factor inventory professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Liebenberg L, Ungar M. Resilience in action—Working with Youth across Cultures and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2008. pp. 17–36.

  60. Wang MC, Haertel GD, Walberg HJ, editors. Fostering Educational Resilience in Inner City Schools. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.

  61. Doob CB. Social Inequality and Social Stratification in US Society. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cauce AM, Stewart A, Rodriguez MD, Cochran B, Ginzler J. Overcoming the Odds? Adolescent Development in the Context of Urban Poverty. In: Luthar SS editor. Resilience and Vulnerability: adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. pp. 343–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Lounsbury DW, Mitchell SG. Introduction to special issue on social ecological approaches to community health research and action. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;44:213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Garmezy N. Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. Am Behav Sci. 1991;34(4):416–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pettit B. “Moving and Children’s Social Connections: the critical importance of context”. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing Working Papers. CRCW, Princeton University, 2000. Accessed: 27. July 2014.

  66. Crawford E, Wright MO, Masten A. Resilience and spirituality in youth. In: Roehlkepartain EC, King PE, Wagener L, Benson PL, editors. The handbook of spiritual development in childhood and adolescence. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. pp. 355–70.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Brooks RB. The power of parenting. In: Goldstein S, Brooks RB, editors. Handbook of resilience in children. New York: Springer; 2006. pp. 297–314.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Liborio R, Ungar M. Children’s labour and work as a risky pathway to resilience: children’s growth in contexts of poor resources. Psicologia Reflexao e Critica. 2010;23:232–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Caplan N, et al. The Boat People and Achievement in America: a study of family life, hard work, and cultural values. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1989.

  70. Caplan N, et al. Indochinese refugee families and academic achievement. Scientific American. 1992;266(2):36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Haines DW. Refugees as immigrants: cambodians, laotians and vietnamese in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1989.

  72. Weiss K, Dennis M. Erfolg in der Nische? Vietnamesen in der DDR und in Ostdeutschland. Münster: LIT Verlag; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Elder GH, Conger RD. Children of the land: adversity and success in rural America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000.

  74. Sanders L. Brain scan foretells who will fold under pressure; Tests on high-stakes math problems identify key regions of neural activity linked to choking, sciencenews.org. 2012. Accessed: 26. July 2014.

  75. Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW, Taylor A, Poulton R. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science. 2002;297:851–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE, Taylor A, Craig IW, Harrington H, McClay J, Mill J, Martin J, Braithwaite A, Poulton R. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene. Science. 2003;301:386–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Caspi A, Hariri AR, Holmes A, Uher R, Moffitt TE. Genetic sensitivity to the environment: the case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:509–27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Charney DS. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(2):195–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ozbay F, Fitterling H, Charney D, Southwick S. Social support and resilience to stress across the life span: a neurobiologic framework. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008;10(4):304–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Petermann F. Grundbegriffe und Trends der Klinischen Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychotherapie. In: Petermann F editor. Lehrbuch der klinischen Kinderpsychologie und—psychotherapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000. pp. 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Flammer A, Alsaker FD. Entwicklungspsychologie der Adoleszenz. Bern: Huber; 2002.

  82. Alsaker TM, Bütikofer A. Geschlechtsunterschiede im Auftreten von psychischen und Verhaltensstörungen im Jugendalter. Kindheit und Entwickung. 2005;14(3):169–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Bull HD, Scheithauer H, Groen G, Petermann F. Der Einfluss kritischer Lebensereignisse und chronischer Belastungen auf die Entwicklung von depressiven, Angststörungen und Störungen des Sozialverhaltens im Jugendalter: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittstudie. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother. 2005;53:143–70.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Silbereisen RK, Petersen AC, Albrecht HT, Kracke B. Maturational timing and the development of problem behavior: longitudinal studies in adolescence. J Early Adolesc. 1989;9(3):247–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Cicchetti D. Perspectives on the interface between normal and atypical development. Dev Psychopathol. 1990;2(4):329–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. McDonough P, Walters V. Gender and health: reassessing patterns and explanations. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:547–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ptacek JT, Smith RE, Zanas J. Gender, appraisal, and coping: a longitudinal analysis. J Pers. 1992;60:747–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Grossman A, Anthony RD, John AF. Aspects of Psychological Resilience among Transgender Youth. LGBT Youth. 2011;8(2):103–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Brunwasser SM, Gillham JE, Kim ES. A meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program’s effect on depressive symptoms. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(6):1042–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Robertson D. Build your Resilience. London: Hodder; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Yates TM, Egeland B, Sroufe LA. Rethinking resilience: a developmental process perspective. In: Luthar S editor. Resilience and vulnerability: adaptation in the context of childhood adversities. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. pp. 234–56.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ager A. Annual Research Review: resilience and child well-being–public policy implications. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(4):488–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Websters VS. Thatcher: the new webster encyclopedic dictionary of the english language. Consolidated Book Publishers; 1970.

  94. McCubbin M, McCubbin HI. Resiliency in families: a conceptual model of family adjustment and adaption to stress and crisis. In: McCubbin HI, Thompson A, McCubbin M editors. Family assessment: resiliency, coping, adaption—inventories for research and practice. Madison: University of Wisconsin System; 1996. pp. 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Vsetecka D. Das Selbst als Quelle der seelischen Gesundheit-Resilienz unter dem Aspekt der personenzentrierten Psychotherapie. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. Wien: Institut für Bildungswissenschaft; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Fonagy P, Steele M, Steele H, Higgitt A, Target M. The Emmanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 1992. The theory and practice of resilience. J Child Psychol Psychiatr Allied Disciplines. 1994;35:231–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Schuhmacher J, Leppert K, Gunzelmann T, Strauß B, Brähler E. Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personenmerkmal. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother. 2005;53(1):16–39.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Welter-Enderlin R, Hildenbrand B, editors. Resilienz—Gedeihen trotz widriger Umstände. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag und Verlagsbuchhandlung, GmbH; 2006. pp. 20–7.

  99. Bender D, Lösel F. Protektive Faktoren der psychisch gesunden Entwicklung junger Menschen: Ein Beitrag zur Kontroverse um saluto- und pathogenetische Ansätze. In: Margraf J. 1998.

  100. Lösel F, Bliesener T. Resilience in adolescence: a study on the generalizability of protective factors. In: Hurrelmann K, Lösel F, editors. Health hazards in adolescence. Berlin: De Gruyter; 1990. pp. 229–320.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Lazarus RS, Launier R. Streßbezogene Transaktion zwischen Person und Umwelt. In: Nitsch JR. Stress — Theorien, Untersuchungen, Maßnahmen. Verlag Hans Huber. Bern Stuttgart Wien. 1981. 213–59.

  102. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.

  103. Brenner A. Helping children cope with stress. Massachusetts: Lexington Books; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrin Skala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skala, K., Bruckner, T. Beating the odds: an approach to the topic of resilience in children and adolescents. Neuropsychiatr 28, 208–217 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-014-0125-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-014-0125-7

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation